Hu Jieping, Yu Yue, Liu Wei, Zhong Jialei, Zhou Xiaochen, Xi Haibo
Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang City, China.
Front Oncol. 2022 Aug 11;12:953069. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.953069. eCollection 2022.
The extent and survival benefits of lymph node dissection (LND) in radical prostatectomy (RP) for pN1M0 prostate cancer (PCa) patients remained unclear and were controversial. This study aimed to determine the survival benefit of different lymph node yields in RP for pN1M0 PCa patients.
pN1M0 PCa patients who received RP and LND were identified in Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) (2010-2015). Patients were divided into two groups in SEER based on the removal of one to three regional lymph nodes (LND1 group) or four or more regional lymph nodes (LND4 group). Kaplan-Meier methods were used to calculate cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS).
In total, 2,200 patients were identified; 264 patients received LND1 and 1,936 patients received LND4. CSS had no significant difference between the LND4 and LND1 groups (101mon vs. 98mon, = 0.064), and OS was higher in LND4 patients compared with LND1 patients (97mon vs. 93mon, = 0.024); for patients with Gleason score = 9 or 10 and T3b or T4, 5-year OS was higher in patients undergoing LND4 (80.9%; 95% CI, 79.0-82.8) compared with those undergoing LND1 (67.5%; 95% CI, 60.8-74.2) ( = 0.009).
More lymph node yield provided better survival for patients with Gleason score = 9 or 10 and T3b or T4, but not for other pN1M0 PCa patients. The extent of LND would be determined after a comprehensive evaluation including Gleason score, tumor stage, and the general condition of the patient.
在pN1M0前列腺癌(PCa)患者的根治性前列腺切除术(RP)中,淋巴结清扫(LND)的范围及生存获益仍不明确且存在争议。本研究旨在确定pN1M0 PCa患者RP中不同淋巴结获取量的生存获益。
在监测、流行病学与最终结果(SEER)数据库(2010 - 2015年)中识别接受RP和LND的pN1M0 PCa患者。基于切除1至3个区域淋巴结(LND1组)或4个及以上区域淋巴结(LND4组),将SEER数据库中的患者分为两组。采用Kaplan - Meier方法计算癌症特异性生存(CSS)和总生存(OS)。
共识别出2200例患者;264例患者接受LND1,1936例患者接受LND4。LND4组与LND1组的CSS无显著差异(101个月对98个月,P = 0.064),LND4组患者的OS高于LND1组患者(97个月对93个月,P = 0.024);对于Gleason评分 = 9或10且T3b或T4的患者,接受LND4的患者5年OS高于接受LND1的患者(80.9%;95%CI,79.0 - 82.8)(67.5%;95%CI,60.8 - 74.2)(P = 0.009)。
更多的淋巴结获取量为Gleason评分 = 9或10且T3b或T4的患者提供了更好的生存,但对其他pN1M0 PCa患者并非如此。LND的范围应在综合评估包括Gleason评分、肿瘤分期和患者一般状况后确定。