Suppr超能文献

使用REMS和RAPS预测非创伤患者的28天死亡率;一项预后准确性研究。

Predicting the 28-Day Mortality of Non-Trauma Patients using REMS and RAPS; a Prognostic Accuracy Study.

作者信息

Garkaz Omid, Rezazadeh Farzin, Golfiroozi Saeed, Paryab Sahar, Nasiri Sadaf, Mehryar Hamidreza, Ghelichi-Ghojogh Mousa

机构信息

School of Public Health, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran.

Emergency Medicine Department, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran.

出版信息

Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2022 Jul 4;10(1):e52. doi: 10.22037/aaem.v10i1.1601. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Various scoring systems have been designed for calculating the mortality risk of patients. This study evaluated the accuracy of Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (REMS) and Rapid Acute Physiology Score (RAPS) in predicting the 28-day mortality of non-trauma patients.

METHODS

This prospective cross-sectional study was conducted on 1003 adult non-trauma patients, who referred to the emergency department of Imam Khomeini Hospital, Urmia, Iran, in the second half of 2018, using the census sampling. We determined the screening performance characteristics of REMS and RAPS in predicting the 28-day mortality of patients.

RESULTS

This study examined 1003 non-trauma patients with a mean age of 61.5±18.05 years (60.6% male). The mean REMS (8.7 ± 3.2 vs. 6.0 ± 3.6; p < 0.001) and RAPS (3.7 ± 2.8 vs. 2.7 ± 2.0; p < 0.001) scores were significantly higher in deceased cases. Sensitivity and specificity of REMS in predicting the risk of non-trauma patients' mortality were 85.19% (95%CI: 78.05% - 90.71%) and 78.34% (95%CI: 75.45% - 81.04%), respectively. While, the Sensitivity and specificity of RAPS in this regard were 61.39% (95%CI: 53.33% - 69.02%) and 71.12% (95%CI: 67.94% - 74.16%), respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of REMS and RAPS were 0.72 (95% CI: 0.68 -0.75) and 0.62 (95% CI: 0.56 - 0.65) in predicting the patients' 28-day mortality, respectively (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The total accuracies of REMS and RAPS in predicting the 28-day mortality of non-trauma patients were in good and poor range, respectively. The screening performance characteristics of REMS were a little better in this regard.

摘要

引言

已设计出各种评分系统来计算患者的死亡风险。本研究评估了快速急诊医学评分(REMS)和快速急性生理学评分(RAPS)在预测非创伤患者28天死亡率方面的准确性。

方法

本前瞻性横断面研究于2018年下半年对1003例成年非创伤患者进行,这些患者使用普查抽样方法转诊至伊朗乌尔米亚伊玛目霍梅尼医院急诊科。我们确定了REMS和RAPS在预测患者28天死亡率方面的筛查性能特征。

结果

本研究检查了1003例非创伤患者,平均年龄为61.5±18.05岁(男性占60.6%)。死亡病例的平均REMS(8.7±3.2对6.0±3.6;p<0.001)和RAPS(3.7±2.8对2.7±2.0;p<0.001)评分显著更高。REMS预测非创伤患者死亡风险的敏感性和特异性分别为85.19%(95%CI:78.05%-90.71%)和78.34%(95%CI:75.45%-81.04%)。而RAPS在这方面的敏感性和特异性分别为61.39%(95%CI:53.33%-69.02%)和71.12%(95%CI:67.94%-74.16%)。在预测患者28天死亡率方面,REMS和RAPS的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积分别为0.72(95%CI:0.68-0.75)和0.62(95%CI:0.56-0.65)(p=0.001)。

结论

REMS和RAPS在预测非创伤患者28天死亡率方面的总体准确性分别处于良好和较差范围。在这方面,REMS的筛查性能特征稍好一些。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8eb/9397601/51e909b6cc1b/aaem-10-e52-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验