Russo Silvia, Colloca Pasquale, Cavazza Nicoletta, Roccato Michele
University of Torino, Via Verdi 10, 10124, Torino, Italy.
University of Bologna, Via Filippo Re 6, 40126, Bologna, Italy.
J Environ Psychol. 2022 Oct;83:101867. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101867. Epub 2022 Aug 21.
In an earlier cross-sectional study, Roccato et al. (2021) showed that household crowding during the COVID-19 lockdown was positively related to support for anti-democratic political systems. However, little is known about the persistence of these effect over time. In this study, we examined its duration in a longitudinal study structured in five waves, the first in May-June 2019 (before the COVID-19 outbreak, = 1504) and the others during the pandemic, in April 2020 (during the lockdown, = 1199), October 2020 ( = 1156), April 2021 ( = 1148), and October 2021 ( = 1151). The increase in support for anti-democratic systems associated with household overcrowding in the initial phase of the lockdown (Wave 2) did not change over the subsequent 17 months. Moreover, the effect was stronger among those who had high (compared with low) trust in democratic political institutions before the pandemic. Strengths, limitations, and potential developments of the study are discussed.
在一项早期的横断面研究中,罗卡托等人(2021年)表明,新冠疫情封锁期间的家庭拥挤与对反民主政治制度的支持呈正相关。然而,对于这些影响随时间的持续性知之甚少。在本研究中,我们在一项分为五个阶段的纵向研究中考察了其持续时间,第一阶段于2019年5月至6月(在新冠疫情爆发前, = 1504)进行,其他阶段在疫情期间进行,分别是2020年4月(封锁期间, = 1199)、2020年10月( = 1156)、2021年4月( = 1148)和2021年10月( = 1151)。在封锁初期(第二阶段)与家庭拥挤相关的对反民主制度支持的增加在随后的17个月中没有变化。此外,在疫情前对民主政治机构信任度高(与信任度低相比)的人群中,这种影响更强。本文还讨论了该研究的优势、局限性和潜在发展方向。