Katona A I
Department of Quantitative Methods, University of Pannonia, Veszprém, Hungary.
J Appl Stat. 2021 Jun 8;49(12):3236-3255. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2021.1936466. eCollection 2022.
Quality control is an outstanding area of production management. The effectiveness of applied quality control methods strongly depends on the performance of the measurement system. Many researchers aimed to analyze the effect of measurement errors on conformity or process control and proposed solutions to treat measurement uncertainty. Although both risk-based conformity control and process control solutions have been designed, verification and validation of these methods have not been provided through laboratory experiments. This paper proposes a case study from the automotive industry regarding the application of risk-based conformity control and risk-based control charts. Acceptance intervals and control limits are optimized to minimize the loss associated with incorrect decisions. The optimization is conducted assuming two scenarios: first, the process and measurement errors are simulated, and second, all data points are measured in the laboratory. This study verifies the applicability of risk-based approaches to real industrial problems and compares the results obtained by simulations and experiments, providing information about the achievable cost reduction opportunities granted by simulations.
质量控制是生产管理中的一个突出领域。所应用的质量控制方法的有效性在很大程度上取决于测量系统的性能。许多研究人员旨在分析测量误差对合格性或过程控制的影响,并提出处理测量不确定度的解决方案。尽管已经设计了基于风险的合格性控制和过程控制解决方案,但尚未通过实验室实验对这些方法进行验证和确认。本文提出了一个来自汽车行业的案例研究,涉及基于风险的合格性控制和基于风险的控制图的应用。优化验收区间和控制限,以尽量减少与错误决策相关的损失。优化是在两种情况下进行的:第一,模拟过程和测量误差;第二,在实验室中测量所有数据点。本研究验证了基于风险的方法对实际工业问题的适用性,并比较了模拟和实验获得的结果,提供了有关模拟可实现的成本降低机会的信息。