Severyns Mathieu, Mallet Julien, Plawecki Stéphane
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital of Martinique, Fort-de-France, Martinique.
Pprime Institut UP 3346, CNRS, University of Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 Aug 22;10(8):23259671221104408. doi: 10.1177/23259671221104408. eCollection 2022 Aug.
Biomechanical studies have shown excellent anteroposterior and rotatory laxity control after double-bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, but no clinical studies have compared midterm (>5-year) residual laxity between the DB and single-bundle (SB) techniques.
To clinically compare sagittal and rotatory laxities and residual sagittal laxity on the KT-1000 arthrometer between patients treated with an SB ACL reconstruction and those treated with a DB ACL reconstruction at the 7-year follow-up.
Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
A total of 110 patients were included between January 2006 and December 2007. The patients were randomly assigned into 2 groups: those treated with SB ACL reconstruction (n = 63) and those treated with the DB technique (n = 47). All patients were then reviewed at a minimum of 7 years of follow-up; patients with ACL rerupture (n = 3 in the SB group and n = 2 in the DB group) were excluded from the postoperative comparative analysis. Residual anterior laxity (Lachman test), rotatory laxity (pivot-shift test), and sagittal laxity (KT-1000 arthrometer side-to-side difference) were measured and compared between the 2 groups.
The mean age at surgery was 23.0 ± 5.1 years for the DB group and 28.1 ± 7.0 years for the SB group, and the mean follow-up was 7.4 ± 0.8 years. No statistically significant differences were found between the 2 groups in terms of age, sex, preoperative laxity on KT-1000, preoperative Tegner score, or concomitant meniscal lesions. Residual postoperative laxity via Lachman testing ( < .01), pivot-shift testing ( = .042), and the KT-1000 arthrometer ( < .01) was statistically significantly in favor of DB reconstruction.
DB ACL reconstruction allowed better control of anterior stability during the evaluation via the Lachman test and via objective measurement on the KT-1000, as well as rotatory stability at a minimum of 7 years of follow-up.
生物力学研究表明,双束(DB)前交叉韧带(ACL)重建术后在前后向和旋转松弛控制方面效果优异,但尚无临床研究比较DB技术与单束(SB)技术在中期(>5年)的残余松弛情况。
在7年随访时,临床比较接受SB ACL重建和DB ACL重建治疗的患者在矢状面和旋转方向的松弛度,以及使用KT-1000关节测量仪测量的残余矢状面松弛度。
队列研究;证据等级,3级。
2006年1月至2007年12月共纳入110例患者。患者被随机分为两组:接受SB ACL重建治疗的患者(n = 63)和接受DB技术治疗的患者(n = 47)。然后对所有患者进行至少7年的随访;ACL再次断裂的患者(SB组n = 3,DB组n = 2)被排除在术后比较分析之外。测量并比较两组之间的残余前向松弛度(Lachman试验)、旋转松弛度(轴移试验)和矢状面松弛度(KT-1000关节测量仪测量的两侧差值)。
DB组手术时的平均年龄为23.0±5.1岁,SB组为28.1±7.0岁,平均随访时间为7.4±0.8年。两组在年龄、性别、术前KT-1000松弛度、术前Tegner评分或合并半月板损伤方面均未发现统计学上的显著差异。通过Lachman试验(P <.01)、轴移试验(P = .042)和KT-1000关节测量仪测量(P <.01),术后残余松弛度在统计学上显著有利于DB重建。
在至少7年的随访中,DB ACL重建在通过Lachman试验评估以及通过KT-1000进行客观测量时,能更好地控制前向稳定性,以及旋转稳定性。