• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Derivation of a clinical-based model to detect invasive bacterial infections in febrile infants.基于临床的发热婴儿侵袭性细菌感染检测模型的建立。
J Hosp Med. 2022 Nov;17(11):893-900. doi: 10.1002/jhm.12956. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
2
Refinement and Validation of a Clinical-Based Approach to Evaluate Young Febrile Infants.基于临床的评估方法对发热婴儿的细化与验证。
Hosp Pediatr. 2022 Apr 1;12(4):399-407. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2021-006214.
3
A Clinical Prediction Rule to Identify Febrile Infants 60 Days and Younger at Low Risk for Serious Bacterial Infections.一种用于识别 60 天及以下发热婴儿中患有严重细菌感染低风险的临床预测规则。
JAMA Pediatr. 2019 Apr 1;173(4):342-351. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.5501.
4
Febrile Infants ≤60 Days Old With Positive Urinalysis Results and Invasive Bacterial Infections.60 天以下发热婴儿,尿液分析阳性结果伴侵袭性细菌感染。
Hosp Pediatr. 2020 Dec;10(12):1120-1125. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2020-000638.
5
Validation and comparison of the PECARN rule, Step-by-Step approach and Lab-score for predicting serious and invasive bacterial infections in young febrile infants.PECARN 规则、分步评估法和实验室评分对预测发热婴幼儿严重及侵袭性细菌感染的验证与比较。
Ann Acad Med Singap. 2022 Oct;51(10):595-604. doi: 10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2022193.
6
A Prediction Model to Identify Febrile Infants ≤60 Days at Low Risk of Invasive Bacterial Infection.预测模型识别≤60 天的发热婴儿侵袭性细菌感染的低风险。
Pediatrics. 2019 Jul;144(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-3604. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
7
Accuracy of Complete Blood Cell Counts to Identify Febrile Infants 60 Days or Younger With Invasive Bacterial Infections.全血细胞计数用于识别60日龄及以下发热婴儿侵袭性细菌感染的准确性。
JAMA Pediatr. 2017 Nov 6;171(11):e172927. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.2927.
8
Temperature threshold in the screening of bacterial infections in young infants with hypothermia.体温阈值在低体温婴儿细菌感染筛查中的应用。
Emerg Med J. 2023 Mar;40(3):189-194. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2022-212575. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
9
Use of Procalcitonin Assays to Predict Serious Bacterial Infection in Young Febrile Infants.降钙素原检测在预测小儿发热中严重细菌感染的应用。
JAMA Pediatr. 2016 Jan;170(1):62-9. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.3210.
10
Febrile young infants with abnormal urine dipstick at low risk of invasive bacterial infection.发热的婴幼儿,尿液干化学试纸检查异常,但侵袭性细菌感染风险低。
Arch Dis Child. 2021 Jul 19;106(8):758-763. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2020-320468.

引用本文的文献

1
Prediction Rule to Identify Febrile Infants 61-90 Days at Low Risk for Invasive Bacterial Infections.识别61至90日龄发热婴儿发生侵袭性细菌感染低风险的预测规则
Pediatrics. 2025 Sep 1;156(3). doi: 10.1542/peds.2025-071666.
2
Development of a machine learning-based prediction model for serious bacterial infections in febrile young infants.基于机器学习的发热小婴儿严重细菌感染预测模型的开发。
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2025 Jul 30;9(1):e003548. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2025-003548.
3
Scoping review of clinical decision aids in the assessment and management of febrile infants under 90 days of age.90日龄以下发热婴儿评估与管理中临床决策辅助工具的范围综述
BMC Pediatr. 2025 Apr 4;25(1):274. doi: 10.1186/s12887-025-05619-3.
4
Variability in Invasive Bacterial Infection Proportions Among Febrile Infants Aged 8-90 Days Using Administrative Data.利用行政数据评估8至90日龄发热婴儿侵袭性细菌感染比例的变异性
Acad Pediatr. 2025 Mar;25(2):102608. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2024.102608. Epub 2024 Nov 20.
5
Increasing acceptance of AI-generated digital twins through clinical trial applications.通过临床试验应用,提高对人工智能生成的数字孪生体的接受度。
Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Jul;17(7):e13897. doi: 10.1111/cts.13897.

本文引用的文献

1
Derivation of a natural language processing algorithm to identify febrile infants.基于自然语言处理算法的发热婴儿识别。
J Hosp Med. 2022 Jan;17(1):11-18. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2732. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
2
Refinement and Validation of a Clinical-Based Approach to Evaluate Young Febrile Infants.基于临床的评估方法对发热婴儿的细化与验证。
Hosp Pediatr. 2022 Apr 1;12(4):399-407. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2021-006214.
3
Evaluation and Management of Well-Appearing Febrile Infants 8 to 60 Days Old.8 至 60 日龄外观健康发热婴儿的评估和管理。
Pediatrics. 2021 Aug;148(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2021-052228. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
4
Using Clinical History Factors to Identify Bacterial Infections in Young Febrile Infants.利用临床病史因素识别发热婴儿中的细菌感染。
J Pediatr. 2021 May;232:192-199.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.12.079. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
5
Association of Cough Status With Bacterial Infections in Febrile Infants.咳嗽状态与发热婴儿细菌感染的关系。
Hosp Pediatr. 2020 Feb;10(2):185-189. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2019-0227. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
6
Prevalence of Bacterial Infection in Febrile Infant 61-90 Days Old Compared With Younger Infants.61-90 天龄发热婴儿与年龄较小婴儿的细菌感染发生率比较。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2019 Dec;38(12):1163-1167. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000002461.
7
A Prediction Model to Identify Febrile Infants ≤60 Days at Low Risk of Invasive Bacterial Infection.预测模型识别≤60 天的发热婴儿侵袭性细菌感染的低风险。
Pediatrics. 2019 Jul;144(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-3604. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
8
A Clinical Prediction Rule to Identify Febrile Infants 60 Days and Younger at Low Risk for Serious Bacterial Infections.一种用于识别 60 天及以下发热婴儿中患有严重细菌感染低风险的临床预测规则。
JAMA Pediatr. 2019 Apr 1;173(4):342-351. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.5501.
9
Bootstrapping the out-of-sample predictions for efficient and accurate cross-validation.对样本外预测进行自抽样以实现高效且准确的交叉验证。
Mach Learn. 2018;107(12):1895-1922. doi: 10.1007/s10994-018-5714-4. Epub 2018 May 9.
10
Advances in the Diagnosis and Management of Febrile Infants: Challenging Tradition.发热婴儿诊断与管理的进展:挑战传统
Adv Pediatr. 2018 Aug;65(1):173-208. doi: 10.1016/j.yapd.2018.04.012.

基于临床的发热婴儿侵袭性细菌感染检测模型的建立。

Derivation of a clinical-based model to detect invasive bacterial infections in febrile infants.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA.

Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA.

出版信息

J Hosp Med. 2022 Nov;17(11):893-900. doi: 10.1002/jhm.12956. Epub 2022 Aug 29.

DOI:10.1002/jhm.12956
PMID:36036211
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9633417/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Febrile infants are at risk for invasive bacterial infections (IBIs) (i.e., bacteremia and bacterial meningitis), which, when undiagnosed, may have devastating consequences. Current IBI predictive models rely on serum biomarkers, which may not provide timely results and may be difficult to obtain in low-resource settings.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to derive a clinical-based IBI predictive model for febrile infants.

DESIGNS, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This is a cross-sectional study of infants brought to two pediatric emergency departments from January 2011 to December 2018. Inclusion criteria were age 0-90 days, temperature ≥38°C, and documented gestational age, fever duration, and illness duration.

MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES

To detect IBIs, we used regression and ensemble machine learning models and evidence-based predictors (i.e., sex, age, chronic medical condition, gestational age, appearance, maximum temperature, fever duration, illness duration, cough status, and urinary tract inflammation). We up-weighted infants with IBIs 8-fold and used 10-fold cross-validation to avoid overfitting. We calculated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), prioritizing a high sensitivity to identify the optimal cut-point to estimate sensitivity and specificity.

RESULTS

Of 2311 febrile infants, 39 had an IBI (1.7%); the median age was 54 days (interquartile range: 35-71). The AUC was 0.819 (95% confidence interval: 0.762, 0.868). The predictive model achieved a sensitivity of 0.974 (0.800, 1.00) and a specificity of 0.530 (0.484, 0.575). Findings suggest that a clinical-based model can detect IBIs in febrile infants, performing similarly to serum biomarker-based models. This model may improve health equity by enabling clinicians to estimate IBI risk in any setting. Future studies should prospectively validate findings across multiple sites and investigate performance by age.

摘要

背景

发热婴儿有发生侵袭性细菌感染(IBI)(即菌血症和细菌性脑膜炎)的风险,如果未被诊断,可能会产生灾难性的后果。目前的 IBI 预测模型依赖于血清生物标志物,这些标志物可能无法提供及时的结果,并且在资源匮乏的环境中可能难以获得。

目的

本研究旨在为发热婴儿建立一种基于临床的 IBI 预测模型。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项 2011 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月期间在两家儿科急诊部门就诊的婴儿的横断面研究。纳入标准为年龄 0-90 天,体温≥38°C,并有记录的胎龄、发热持续时间和疾病持续时间。

主要结果和测量指标

为了检测 IBI,我们使用了回归和集成机器学习模型以及基于证据的预测因子(即性别、年龄、慢性疾病、胎龄、外观、最高体温、发热持续时间、疾病持续时间、咳嗽状态和尿路感染)。我们将 IBI 婴儿的权重提高 8 倍,并使用 10 倍交叉验证来避免过度拟合。我们计算了接收器操作特征曲线下的面积(AUC),优先考虑高灵敏度以确定最佳切点来估计敏感性和特异性。

结果

在 2311 名发热婴儿中,有 39 名患有 IBI(1.7%);中位数年龄为 54 天(四分位距:35-71)。AUC 为 0.819(95%置信区间:0.762,0.868)。预测模型的灵敏度为 0.974(0.800,1.00),特异性为 0.530(0.484,0.575)。研究结果表明,基于临床的模型可以检测发热婴儿的 IBI,其性能与基于血清生物标志物的模型相似。该模型可以通过使临床医生能够在任何环境下估计 IBI 风险,从而提高卫生公平性。未来的研究应在多个地点前瞻性验证这些发现,并研究按年龄划分的性能。