Division of Orthodontics, University Clinic of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Department of Orthodontics, Sigmund Freud University Vienna, 1020, Vienna, Austria.
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Mar;27(3):1063-1070. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04690-9. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Agenesis of the maxillary lateral incisor occurs in up to 4% of all individuals and requires multidisciplinary treatment. Its developmental origins, however, are not fully understood. Earlier studies documented genetic factors contributing to agenesis but also an association with craniofacial morphology. In this study, we assessed the association between maxillary morphology and lateral incisor agenesis by a geometric morphometric approach to disentangle the roles of developmental plasticity and genetic factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We quantified the maxillary alveolar ridge by 19 two-dimensional landmarks on cross-sectional images of 101 computed tomography scans. We compared the shape and size of the alveolar ridge across patients with unilateral or bilateral agenesis of maxillary lateral incisors and patients with extracted or in situ incisors. RESULTS: The maxillary alveolar ridge was clearly narrower in patients with agenesis or an extracted incisor compared to the control group, whereas the contralateral side of the unilateral agenesis had an intermediate width. Despite massive individual variation, the ventral curvature of the alveolar ridge was, on average, more pronounced in the bilateral agenesis group compared to unilateral agenesis and tooth extraction. CONCLUSIONS: This suggests that pleiotropic genetic and epigenetic factors influence both tooth development and cranial growth, but an inappropriately sized or shaped alveolar process may also inhibit normal formation or development of the tooth bud, thus leading to dental agenesis. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our results indicate that bilateral agenesis of the lateral incisor tends to be associated with a higher need of bone augmentation prior to implant placement than unilateral agenesis.
背景与目的:上颌侧切牙缺失在所有个体中发生率高达 4%,需要多学科治疗。但其发育起源尚未完全阐明。早期研究记录了导致缺失的遗传因素,但也与颅面形态有关。在这项研究中,我们通过几何形态测量法评估上颌形态与侧切牙缺失之间的关联,以厘清发育可塑性和遗传因素的作用。
材料与方法:我们通过 101 例 CT 扫描的横断面上的 19 个二维标志点来量化上颌牙槽嵴。我们比较了单侧或双侧上颌侧切牙缺失患者与有埋伏牙或已拔除牙患者的牙槽嵴形状和大小。
结果:与对照组相比,缺失牙或已拔牙患者的上颌牙槽嵴明显更窄,而单侧缺失的对侧牙槽嵴宽度则处于中间。尽管存在巨大的个体变异,但双侧缺失组的牙槽嵴腹侧曲率平均比单侧缺失和拔牙组更明显。
结论:这表明多效性遗传和表观遗传因素不仅影响牙齿发育,还影响颅面生长,但牙槽突大小或形状不当也可能抑制牙胚的正常形成或发育,从而导致牙齿缺失。
临床意义:我们的结果表明,双侧侧切牙缺失在种植前比单侧缺失更需要进行骨增量,以满足种植体的植入需求。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023-3
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016-7-3
Eur J Orthod. 2011-9-12
J Prosthet Dent. 2016-2
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2017-5-31
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2023-8-9
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2018
J Dev Biol. 2017-5-31
J Orofac Orthop. 2017-11
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017-4-18
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016-7-3