Suppr超能文献

不同经颅直流电刺激模式对急性脑卒中患者血流动力学反应和运动功能的影响:一项随机对照试验。

Effects of Different Montages of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Haemodynamic Responses and Motor Performance in Acute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

机构信息

Faculty of Physical Therapy; Neuro Electrical Stimulation Laboratory (NeuE Lab), Faculty of Physical Therapy, Mahidol University, Salaya, Phutthamonthon, Nakhon Pathom.

Department of Medicine; Siriraj Stroke Center, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

J Rehabil Med. 2022 Sep 13;54:jrm00331. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v54.3208.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has shown positive results in neurorehabilitation. However, there is limited evidence on its use in acute stroke, and unclear evidence regarding the best tDCS montage (anodal-, cathodal-, or dualtDCS) for stroke recovery. This study investigated the effects of these montages combined with physical therapy on haemodynamic response and motor performance.

METHODS

Eighty-two eligible acute stroke participants were allocated randomly into anodal, cathodal, dual, and sham groups. They received 5 consecutive sessions of tDCS combined with physical therapy for 5 days. Cerebral mean blood flow velocity (MFV) and motor outcomes were assessed pre and post-intervention and at a 1-month follow-up.

RESULTS

None of the groups showed significant changes in the MFV in the lesioned or non-lesioned hemispheres immediately post-intervention or at a 1-month follow-up. For motor performance, all outcomes improved over time for all groups; between-group comparisons showed that the dual-tDCS group had significantly greater improvement than the other groups for most of the lower-limb performance measures. All 5-day tDCS montages were safe.

CONCLUSION

MFV was not modulated following active or sham groups. However, dual-tDCS was more efficient in improving motor performance than other groups, especially for lower-limb performance, with after-effects lasting at least 1 month.

摘要

目的

经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)在神经康复中显示出积极的效果。然而,其在急性中风中的应用证据有限,关于最适合中风康复的 tDCS 模式(阳极、阴极或双 tDCS)的证据也不清楚。本研究旨在探讨这些模式与物理疗法联合应用对血液动力学反应和运动表现的影响。

方法

82 名符合条件的急性中风患者被随机分配到阳极、阴极、双 tDCS 和假刺激组。他们接受了 5 次连续的 tDCS 联合物理治疗,共 5 天。在干预前、干预后和 1 个月随访时评估大脑平均血流速度(MFV)和运动结果。

结果

没有一个组在干预后即刻或 1 个月随访时显示出病变或非病变半球的 MFV 有显著变化。对于运动表现,所有组的所有结果都随着时间的推移而改善;组间比较显示,双 tDCS 组在大多数下肢运动表现测量方面的改善明显优于其他组。所有 5 天的 tDCS 模式都是安全的。

结论

在接受积极或假刺激的组中,MFV 没有发生调节。然而,双 tDCS 组在改善运动表现方面比其他组更有效,特别是在下肢运动表现方面,其效果至少持续 1 个月。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2099/9480582/cac133ae6b83/JRM-54-3208-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验