Rombouts Ellen, Leenen Liesl, Maes Bea, Zink Inge
Department of Neurosciences, Experimental Otorhinolaryngology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Speech-Language Pathology & Audiology Sciences Master Program, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2023 Jan;58(1):206-220. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12780. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
Individuals with developmental language disorder or Williams syndrome are reported to use more gestures than individuals with typical development. However, these two groups differ considerably in visuospatial and language skills, two skills that are hypothesized to shape gesture rate.
We first examined whether children with both developmental language disorder and children Williams syndrome do indeed use more gestures. Our second aim was to disentangle the role of vocabulary and visuospatial skills in the use of supplementary gestures (i.e., containing unique information). To account for participant heterogeneity, analyses included both group comparisons and vocabulary and visuospatial skills at an individual level. As a third aim, the role of visuospatial skills was further examined in relation to gestures containing spatial content.
METHODS & PROCEDURES: In a cross-sectional group design, three participant groups watched and then retold a cartoon: children with typical development (n = 25), children with developmental language disorder (n = 25) and children/young people with Williams syndrome (n = 14). Their narrations were transcribed and hand gestures were coded based on gesture-speech integration (redundant, adds information to particular lexical items, gives information that is entirely absent from speech) and spatial content. Participants' expressive vocabulary and visuospatial skills were measured.
OUTCOMES & RESULTS: Between-group comparisons showed that individuals with developmental language disorder or Williams syndrome did indeed use more gestures. Poisson loglinear modelling demonstrated that a relative higher use of supplementary gestures was determined by lower expressive vocabulary skills. Neither the group distinction nor visuospatial skills shaped the supplementary gesture rate nor spatial gesture rate.
CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: Regardless of neurodevelopmental condition or typical development, a higher use of supplementary gestures was influenced by expressive vocabulary skills. Children with lower vocabulary skills spontaneously capitalized on the multimodality of communication to express constituents that were not present in their verbal speech. This finding is a promising starting point for future gesture intervention studies examining whether implicit modelling of gesture use can encourage gestures even more in these children and if this allows them to achieve higher linguistic complexity. On a methodological note, the observed intra-group skill variability demonstrates that group comparisons need to be complemented with correlational measures accounting for skills at an individual level.
What is already known on the subject Children with developmental language disorder and children with Williams syndrome are more inclined to use gestures than typically developing children. Research conducted in adults with typical development points towards the role of lexical and visuospatial skills in gesture use, but it is unclear how these skills shape gesture use in children with atypical development. What this paper adds to existing knowledge This study compares the rate of gestures that convey meaning that is not expressed in speech between the three aforementioned populations. Novel is the inclusion of the group distinction, individual lexical skills, and visuospatial skills in one encompassing statistical model. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? The inclination to use gestures that replace speech is related to lexical skills. Visuospatial skills do not seem to play a role and should not be considered as a factor when thinking about gesture intervention. Understanding how gestures relate to specific skills is a first step to understanding how gesture interventions can bolster language production.
据报道,患有发育性语言障碍或威廉姆斯综合征的个体比发育正常的个体使用更多手势。然而,这两组在视觉空间和语言技能方面有很大差异,而这两种技能被认为会影响手势频率。
我们首先研究患有发育性语言障碍的儿童和患有威廉姆斯综合征的儿童是否确实使用更多手势。我们的第二个目的是厘清词汇和视觉空间技能在补充性手势(即包含独特信息的手势)使用中的作用。为了考虑参与者的异质性,分析包括组间比较以及个体层面的词汇和视觉空间技能。作为第三个目的,进一步研究视觉空间技能与包含空间内容的手势之间的关系。
在一项横断面组间设计中,三个参与者组观看并复述了一部卡通片:发育正常的儿童(n = 25)、患有发育性语言障碍的儿童(n = 25)和患有威廉姆斯综合征的儿童/青少年(n = 14)。他们的叙述被转录,手势根据手势与言语的整合情况(冗余、为特定词汇项添加信息、提供言语中完全没有的信息)和空间内容进行编码。测量了参与者的表达性词汇和视觉空间技能。
组间比较表明,患有发育性语言障碍或威廉姆斯综合征的个体确实使用更多手势。泊松对数线性模型表明,补充性手势的相对较高使用率是由较低的表达性词汇技能决定的。组间差异和视觉空间技能都没有影响补充性手势频率或空间手势频率。
无论神经发育状况或发育是否正常,补充性手势的较高使用率都受到表达性词汇技能的影响。词汇技能较低的儿童会自发地利用交流的多模态来表达其言语中没有的成分。这一发现是未来手势干预研究的一个有前景的起点,该研究将考察手势使用的隐性示范是否能进一步鼓励这些儿童使用手势,以及这是否能使他们实现更高的语言复杂性。在方法方面,观察到的组内技能变异性表明,组间比较需要辅以考虑个体层面技能的相关测量方法。
关于该主题的已知信息 患有发育性语言障碍的儿童和患有威廉姆斯综合征的儿童比发育正常的儿童更倾向于使用手势。对发育正常的成年人进行的研究指出了词汇和视觉空间技能在手势使用中的作用,但尚不清楚这些技能如何影响发育异常儿童的手势使用。本文对现有知识的补充 本研究比较了上述三组人群中传达言语中未表达意义的手势频率。新颖之处在于将组间差异、个体词汇技能和视觉空间技能纳入一个综合统计模型。这项工作的潜在或实际临床意义是什么?用手势替代言语的倾向与词汇技能有关。视觉空间技能似乎不起作用,在考虑手势干预时不应将其视为一个因素。理解手势与特定技能的关系是理解手势干预如何促进语言表达的第一步。