• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性冠状动脉综合征患者冠状动脉血栓负荷中的肥胖悖论

Obesity Paradox in Coronary Thrombus Burden of Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.

作者信息

Külahçıoğlu Şeyhmus, Kültürsay Barkın, Çeneli Doğancan, Bıyıklı Kadir, Danışman Neşri, Karaçam Murat, Tuncer Şeref Berk, Demirci Koray, Eminoğlu Halit, Korun Okan, Karagöz Ali, Kaymaz Cihangir

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Kartal Kosuyolu Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2022 Oct;20(8):489-496. doi: 10.1089/met.2022.0046. Epub 2022 Aug 26.

DOI:10.1089/met.2022.0046
PMID:36037015
Abstract

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Although obesity is a risk factor for ACS, decreased mortality has been shown in overweight individuals. This study aims to determine the association of body fat parameters such as body fat percentage (BFP), relative fat mass (RFM), and coronary thrombus burden with angiographic thrombotic grade in a series of patients presenting with ACS. Three hundred ninety patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention were enrolled in the study. BFP was calculated using the U.S. Navy formula. RFM index was calculated using gender, height, and waist circumference regardless of weight. Body mass index (BMI) is calculated as the weight in kilograms divided by the square of body length in meters (kg/m). Two experienced interventional cardiologists reviewed coronary angiograms according to the TIMI thrombus scale. Patients were divided into groups according to thrombus classification and clinical status. RFM, which is an anthropometric measurement parameter for obesity, was inversely related to thrombus burden in patients with ACS. There were no significant differences between ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) groups according to demographic, clinical characteristics, and coronary risk factors. Likewise, RFM, BFP, and BMI were comparable between the two groups. BFP and RFM were lower in patients with thrombus present STEMI group compared with no thrombus group. Thrombus presence was also compared in the NSTEMI group, and BMI, BFP, and RFM were lower in patients with thrombus present NSTEMI group. Our analysis demonstrated that RFM was better than BFP and BMI for predicting thrombus presence in patients with ACS.

摘要

急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)仍是全球发病和死亡的主要原因。尽管肥胖是ACS的一个危险因素,但超重个体的死亡率已显示有所下降。本研究旨在确定一系列ACS患者中体脂参数如体脂百分比(BFP)、相对脂肪量(RFM)和冠状动脉血栓负荷与血管造影血栓分级之间的关联。390例行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者纳入本研究。BFP采用美国海军公式计算。RFM指数根据性别、身高和腰围计算,与体重无关。体重指数(BMI)计算为体重(千克)除以身高(米)的平方(kg/m²)。两位经验丰富的介入心脏病专家根据TIMI血栓量表对冠状动脉造影进行评估。患者根据血栓分类和临床状况分组。RFM作为肥胖的人体测量参数,与ACS患者的血栓负荷呈负相关。根据人口统计学、临床特征和冠状动脉危险因素,ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)组和非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)组之间无显著差异。同样,两组之间的RFM、BFP和BMI具有可比性。STEMI组有血栓患者的BFP和RFM低于无血栓组。NSTEMI组也比较了血栓的存在情况,NSTEMI组有血栓患者的BMI、BFP和RFM较低。我们的分析表明,在预测ACS患者血栓存在方面,RFM优于BFP和BMI。

相似文献

1
Obesity Paradox in Coronary Thrombus Burden of Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.急性冠状动脉综合征患者冠状动脉血栓负荷中的肥胖悖论
Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2022 Oct;20(8):489-496. doi: 10.1089/met.2022.0046. Epub 2022 Aug 26.
2
Body fat percentage and infarct size in patients with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction.非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的体脂百分比与梗死面积
North Clin Istanb. 2023 Sep 13;10(5):567-574. doi: 10.14744/nci.2023.87259. eCollection 2023.
3
Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index: A Novel Predictor of Coronary Thrombus Burden in Patients with Non-ST Acute Coronary Syndrome.全身免疫炎症指数:一种预测非 ST 段急性冠脉综合征患者冠状动脉血栓负荷的新指标。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Jan 18;58(2):143. doi: 10.3390/medicina58020143.
4
The Relationship of Body Mass Index to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Outcomes: Does the Obesity Paradox Exist in Contemporary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Cohorts? Insights From the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Registry.体重指数与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗结局的关系:肥胖悖论是否存在于当代经皮冠状动脉介入治疗队列中?来自英国心血管介入学会注册中心的见解。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jul 10;10(13):1283-1292. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.03.013.
5
Nationwide trends in acute coronary syndrome by subtype in New Zealand 2006-2016.新西兰 2006-2016 年急性冠状动脉综合征亚型的全国趋势。
Heart. 2020 Feb;106(3):221-227. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-315655. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
6
Immediate and early percutaneous coronary intervention in very high-risk and high-risk non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction patients.极高危和高危非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的即刻和早期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。
Clin Cardiol. 2022 Apr;45(4):359-369. doi: 10.1002/clc.23781. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
7
Impact of body mass index on clinical outcome among elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights from the ELDERLY ACS 2 trial.体重指数对行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的老年急性冠状动脉综合征患者临床结局的影响:来自 ELDERLY ACS 2 试验的观察。
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2020 May 7;30(5):730-737. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2020.01.001. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
8
Epidemiology and risk factors of patients with types of acute coronary syndrome presenting to a tertiary care hospital in Sri Lanka.斯里兰卡一家三级护理医院收治的不同类型急性冠脉综合征患者的流行病学和危险因素。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019 Oct 21;19(1):229. doi: 10.1186/s12872-019-1217-x.
9
Coronary plaque rupture with subsequent thrombosis typifies the culprit lesion of non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, not unstable angina: non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome study.冠状动脉斑块破裂伴随后续血栓形成是非ST段抬高型心肌梗死而非不稳定型心绞痛的罪犯病变特征:非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征研究。
Heart Vessels. 2017 Mar;32(3):241-251. doi: 10.1007/s00380-016-0862-6. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
10
Prognostic impact of prepercutaneous coronary intervention TIMI flow in patients with ST-segment and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Results from the FAST-MI 2010 registry.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 TIMI 血流对 ST 段抬高和非 ST 段抬高心肌梗死患者预后的影响:来自 FAST-MI 2010 注册研究的结果。
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2018 Feb;111(2):101-108. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2017.04.004. Epub 2017 Sep 19.