O'Neill School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405.
Maxine Goodman Levin College of Urban Affairs, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, OH 44115.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Sep 6;119(36):e2205356119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2205356119. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
When households struggle to pay their energy bills and avoid being disconnected from the grid, they may accrue debt, forgo expenses on food, and use space heaters or ovens to warm their homes. These coping strategies can introduce significant physical and financial risks. In this study, we analyze an original survey with a representative sample of low-income households during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, from June 2020 to May 2021. We evaluate the prevalence of a wide range of coping strategies and empirically estimate the determinants of these strategies. We find that more than half of all low-income households engage in at least one coping strategy, and many use multiple strategies. Households with vulnerable members, including young children or those who rely on electronic medical devices, and households that live in deficient housing conditions, are more likely to use a range of coping strategies, and many at once. Our findings have direct implications for public policy improvements, including modifications to the US Weatherization Assistance Program, the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program, and state utility disconnection protections.
当家庭难以支付能源账单并避免与电网断开连接时,他们可能会负债累累,放弃食品开支,并使用空间加热器或烤箱来取暖。这些应对策略会带来重大的身体和经济风险。在这项研究中,我们分析了 COVID-19 大流行第一年(2020 年 6 月至 2021 年 5 月)期间对低收入家庭进行的一项具有代表性的原始调查。我们评估了广泛的应对策略的流行程度,并从经验上估计了这些策略的决定因素。我们发现,超过一半的低收入家庭至少采取了一种应对策略,许多家庭同时采用多种策略。有脆弱成员(包括幼儿或依赖电子医疗设备的成员)的家庭和居住在住房条件不足的家庭更有可能采用一系列应对策略,而且许多家庭同时采用多种策略。我们的研究结果对公共政策的改进具有直接影响,包括对美国房屋隔热援助计划、低收入家庭能源援助计划以及州公用事业断电保护的修改。