Health, Behavior & Society Department (Dr Carman) and Health, Management & Policy Department (Dr Hogg-Graham), College of Public Health, University of Kentucky (Ms Gatton), Lexington, Kentucky.
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2022;28(6):E808-E814. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001594. Epub 2022 Aug 27.
The purpose of this study was to examine patterns of cross-jurisdictional sharing across the 61 local public health jurisdictions (LHJs) in Kentucky. The opportunities to reduce the cost-of-service delivery for Kentucky's LHJs via cross-jurisdictional sharing present a mechanism to address financial instability across the state by achieving economies of scale, especially among smaller jurisdictions.
A cross-sectional study design was used to examine patterns of cross-jurisdictional sharing across the 61 LHJs in Kentucky. The survey tool utilized was designed by the Center for Sharing Public Health Services, an initiative managed by the Kansas Health Institute with support from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
Seventy-two percent of the 61 LHJs in Kentucky responded to the survey. The majority of responding jurisdictions sharing services were rural, single-county jurisdictions, utilizing service-related informal sharing arrangements. The majority of health departments, when asked to identify which programmatic areas shared service arrangements were focused in, listed those services requiring intensive staff training such as Health Access Nurturing Development Services (HANDS) and epidemiology. Of particular interest were the services most infrequently shared such as communicable disease screening and treatment.
This study suggests that, pre-COVID-19, a core group of primarily rural, single-county Kentucky local health departments has experience with cross-jurisdictional sharing. Among this group, engagement in informal arrangements was the form of cross-jurisdictional sharing predominantly used, with few jurisdictions reporting shared functions with joint oversight. When considering the potential benefits and efficiencies that cross-jurisdictional sharing can provide to public health departments and their communities, for some, COVID-19 may have been a catalyst to engage in sharing across health department jurisdictional lines.
本研究旨在考察肯塔基州 61 个地方公共卫生管辖区(LHJ)之间的跨辖区共享模式。通过跨辖区共享来降低肯塔基州 LHJ 的服务成本,为解决全州范围内的财政不稳定问题提供了一种机制,特别是在较小的管辖区之间,可以实现规模经济。
本研究采用横断面研究设计,考察了肯塔基州 61 个 LHJ 之间的跨辖区共享模式。使用的调查工具由共享公共卫生服务中心设计,该中心是堪萨斯卫生协会的一个倡议,得到了罗伯特伍德约翰逊基金会的支持。
肯塔基州 61 个 LHJ 中有 72%对调查做出了回应。参与服务共享的大多数管辖区是农村、单一县的管辖区,采用服务相关的非正式共享安排。大多数卫生部门在被要求确定服务共享安排集中在哪些计划领域时,将那些需要密集员工培训的服务列入名单,如健康访问培育发展服务(HANDS)和流行病学。特别值得关注的是那些服务共享最少的领域,如传染病筛查和治疗。
本研究表明,在 COVID-19 之前,肯塔基州主要的农村、单一县地方卫生部门核心群体已经有跨辖区共享的经验。在这一群体中,参与非正式安排是主要的跨辖区共享形式,很少有管辖区报告具有联合监督的共享职能。在考虑跨辖区共享可以为公共卫生部门及其社区提供的潜在利益和效率时,对于一些社区来说,COVID-19 可能是促使它们跨越卫生部门辖区界限进行共享的催化剂。