Suppr超能文献

经颅多普勒超声质量保证用流量模型的研制。

Development of a Flow Phantom for Transcranial Doppler Ultrasound Quality Assurance.

机构信息

Radiology and Medical Imaging Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Kharj, Saudi Arabia; Cerebral Haemodynamics in Aging and Stroke Medicine (CHIASM) Group, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.

Cerebral Haemodynamics in Aging and Stroke Medicine (CHIASM) Group, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK; Medical Physics Department, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.

出版信息

Ultrasound Med Biol. 2022 Nov;48(11):2302-2309. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2022.07.002. Epub 2022 Aug 26.

Abstract

Anecdotal evidence was recently brought to our attention suggesting a potential difference in velocity estimates between transcranial Doppler (TCD) systems when measuring high velocities (∼200 cm/s) close to the threshold for sickle cell disease stroke prevention. As we were unable to identify a suitable commercial TCD phantom, a middle cerebral artery (MCA) flow phantom was developed to evaluate velocity estimates from different devices under controlled conditions. Time-averaged velocity estimates were obtained using two TCD devices: a Spencer Technologies ST Doppler system (ST PMD150, Spencer Technologies, Seattle, WA, USA) and a DWL Dopplerbox (DWL Compumedics, SN-300947, Singen, Germany). These were compared with velocity estimates obtained using a Zonare duplex scanner (Zonare Medical Systems, Mountain View, CA, USA), with timed collection of fluid as the gold standard. Bland-Altman analysis was performed to compare measurements between devices. Our tests confirmed that velocities measured with the DWL TCD system were +4.1 cm/s (+3.7%; limits of agreement [LoA]: 2%, 5%; p = 0.03) higher than the Spencer system when measuring a velocity 110 cm/s and +12 cm/s higher (+5.7 %; LoA: 4.8%, 6.6%; p = 0.03) when measuring velocities of 210 cm/s, close to the diagnostic threshold for stroke intervention. We found our MCA phantom to be a valuable tool for systematically quantifying differences in TCD velocity estimates between devices, confirming that the DWL system gave consistently higher readings than the Spencer ST system. Differences become more pronounced at high velocities, which explains why they were not identified earlier. Our findings have clinical implications for centers using TCD to monitor patients with sickle cell disease, as extra care may be needed to adjust for bias between manufacturers when making treatment decisions about children with sickle cell with velocities close to the diagnostic threshold.

摘要

最近我们注意到一些传闻证据,表明在接近镰状细胞病卒中预防阈值的高速度(约 200cm/s)下,经颅多普勒(TCD)系统测量时,各系统之间的速度估计可能存在差异。由于我们无法识别合适的商业 TCD 体模,因此开发了一个大脑中动脉(MCA)流量体模,以在受控条件下评估来自不同设备的速度估计值。使用两种 TCD 设备获得时间平均速度估计值:Spencer 技术公司的 ST Doppler 系统(ST PMD150,Spencer 技术公司,西雅图,WA,美国)和 DWL Dopplerbox(DWL Compumedics,SN-300947,Singen,德国)。将这些值与使用 Zonare 双工扫描仪(Zonare Medical Systems,Mountain View,CA,美国)获得的速度估计值进行比较,将定时采集的流体作为金标准。对设备之间的测量值进行 Bland-Altman 分析。我们的测试证实,当测量 110cm/s 的速度时,DWL TCD 系统测量的速度比 Spencer 系统高 4.1cm/s(+4.1%;一致性界限[LoA]:2%,5%;p=0.03),当测量 210cm/s 接近卒中干预诊断阈值的速度时,速度高 12cm/s(+5.7%;LoA:4.8%,6.6%;p=0.03)。我们发现我们的 MCA 体模是一种用于系统地量化设备之间 TCD 速度估计值差异的有价值的工具,证实 DWL 系统的读数始终高于 Spencer ST 系统。在高速度下,差异更加明显,这就是为什么之前没有发现这些差异的原因。我们的发现对使用 TCD 监测镰状细胞病患者的中心具有临床意义,因为在做出关于接近诊断阈值的镰状细胞儿童的治疗决策时,可能需要额外注意制造商之间的偏差。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验