• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

科学教育中关于科学本质的家族相似性方法研究的系统综述

A Systematic Review of Research on Family Resemblance Approach to Nature of Science in Science Education.

作者信息

Cheung Kason Ka Ching, Erduran Sibel

机构信息

Department of Education, University of Oxford, 15 Norham Gardens, Oxford, OX2 6PY UK.

出版信息

Sci Educ (Dordr). 2022 Aug 25:1-37. doi: 10.1007/s11191-022-00379-3.

DOI:10.1007/s11191-022-00379-3
PMID:36039351
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9403965/
Abstract

The paper reports about the outcome of a systematic review of research on family resemblance approach (FRA) to nature of science in (NOS) science education. FRA is a relatively recent perspective on NOS being a system of cognitive-epistemic and social-institutional aspects of science. FRA thus consists of a set of categories such as aims and values, practices, knowledge and social organizations in relation to NOS. Since the introduction of the FRA, there has been increasing interest in investigations about how FRA can be of use in science education both empirically and practically. A journal content analysis was conducted in order to investigate which FRA categories are covered in journal articles and to identify the characteristics of the studies that have used FRA. These characteristics included the target level of education and focus on pre- or in-service teachers. Furthermore, epistemic network analysis of theoretical and empirical papers was conducted to determine the extent to which the studies incorporated various key themes about FRA, such as its transferability to other domains and differentiation of the social-institutional system categories. The findings illustrate an increasing number of empirical studies using FRA in recent years and broad coverage in science education. Although the social-institutional system categories included intraconnections, these were not as strong as those intraconnections among categories within the cognitive-epistemic system. Future research directions for the use of FRA in K-12 science education are discussed.

摘要

本文报道了一项关于科学教育中自然科学本质的家族相似性方法(FRA)研究的系统评价结果。FRA是一种相对较新的关于自然科学本质的观点,认为自然科学是一个由科学的认知-认识论和社会-制度方面组成的系统。因此,FRA由一组与自然科学本质相关的类别组成,如目标和价值观、实践、知识和社会组织。自FRA引入以来,人们对FRA如何在科学教育中进行实证和实践应用的研究兴趣日益浓厚。为了调查期刊文章中涵盖了哪些FRA类别,并确定使用FRA的研究的特征,进行了一项期刊内容分析。这些特征包括教育的目标水平以及对职前或在职教师的关注。此外,对理论和实证论文进行了认知网络分析,以确定这些研究在多大程度上纳入了关于FRA的各种关键主题,如FRA向其他领域的可转移性以及社会-制度系统类别的区分。研究结果表明,近年来使用FRA的实证研究数量不断增加,且在科学教育中的覆盖面很广。虽然社会-制度系统类别包括内部联系,但这些联系不如认知-认识论系统内类别之间的联系那么紧密。文中还讨论了在K-12科学教育中使用FRA的未来研究方向。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6822/9403965/f8cf2841c767/11191_2022_379_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6822/9403965/017763b2b3de/11191_2022_379_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6822/9403965/80fee4015cc5/11191_2022_379_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6822/9403965/542d143a5784/11191_2022_379_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6822/9403965/f8cf2841c767/11191_2022_379_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6822/9403965/017763b2b3de/11191_2022_379_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6822/9403965/80fee4015cc5/11191_2022_379_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6822/9403965/542d143a5784/11191_2022_379_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6822/9403965/f8cf2841c767/11191_2022_379_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A Systematic Review of Research on Family Resemblance Approach to Nature of Science in Science Education.科学教育中关于科学本质的家族相似性方法研究的系统综述
Sci Educ (Dordr). 2022 Aug 25:1-37. doi: 10.1007/s11191-022-00379-3.
2
To FRA or not to FRA: What is the question for science education?是采用基于风险评估的方法(FRA)还是不采用:科学教育面临的问题是什么?
Sci Educ (Dordr). 2023 Mar 10:1-18. doi: 10.1007/s11191-023-00425-8.
3
What do COVID-19 Tweets Reveal about Public Engagement with Nature of Science?关于公众对科学本质的参与,新冠疫情推文揭示了什么?
Sci Educ (Dordr). 2022;31(2):293-323. doi: 10.1007/s11191-021-00233-y. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
6
Hydroids (Cnidaria, Hydrozoa) from Mauritanian Coral Mounds.来自毛里塔尼亚珊瑚丘的水螅虫纲动物(刺胞动物门,水螅虫纲)。
Zootaxa. 2020 Nov 16;4878(3):zootaxa.4878.3.2. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.4878.3.2.
7
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
8
Spanish Science Teacher Educators' Preparation, Experiences, and Views About Nature of Science in Science Education.西班牙科学教师教育工作者在科学教育中关于科学本质的准备、经历和观点。
Sci Educ (Dordr). 2022;31(3):685-711. doi: 10.1007/s11191-021-00263-6. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
9
Faculty development initiatives designed to promote leadership in medical education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 19.旨在促进医学教育领导力的教师发展计划。BEME 系统评价:BEME 指南第 19 号。
Med Teach. 2012;34(6):483-503. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.680937.
10
Is There a Limit to Resemblances?: Teaching About Science and Pseudoscience From a Family Resemblance Perspective.相似性存在限度吗?:从家族相似性视角讲授科学与伪科学
Sci Educ (Dordr). 2022 Oct 11:1-22. doi: 10.1007/s11191-022-00394-4.

引用本文的文献

1
To FRA or not to FRA: What is the question for science education?是采用基于风险评估的方法(FRA)还是不采用:科学教育面临的问题是什么?
Sci Educ (Dordr). 2023 Mar 10:1-18. doi: 10.1007/s11191-023-00425-8.
2
Communicating science in the COVID-19 news in the UK during Omicron waves: exploring representations of nature of science with epistemic network analysis.在英国奥密克戎毒株流行期间的新冠疫情新闻中传播科学:运用认知网络分析探索科学本质的呈现方式
Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2023;10(1):282. doi: 10.1057/s41599-023-01771-2. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
3
Science communication in the media and human mobility during the COVID-19 pandemic: a time series and content analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of epistemic framing of teaching videos and summative assessments on students' learning of scientific methods.教学视频的认知框架和总结性评估对学生科学方法学习的影响。
Int J Sci Educ. 2021 Dec 1;43(18):2885-2910. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2021.1998717. eCollection 2021.
2
Beyond Hypothesis Testing: Investigating the Diversity of Scientific Methods in Science Teachers' Understanding.超越假设检验:探究科学教师理解中科学方法的多样性
Sci Educ (Dordr). 2021;30(2):345-364. doi: 10.1007/s11191-020-00185-9. Epub 2021 Feb 6.
3
What do COVID-19 Tweets Reveal about Public Engagement with Nature of Science?
新冠疫情期间媒体的科学传播与人类流动性:一项时间序列和内容分析。
Public Health. 2023 May;218:106-113. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2023.03.001. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
4
Is There a Limit to Resemblances?: Teaching About Science and Pseudoscience From a Family Resemblance Perspective.相似性存在限度吗?:从家族相似性视角讲授科学与伪科学
Sci Educ (Dordr). 2022 Oct 11:1-22. doi: 10.1007/s11191-022-00394-4.
关于公众对科学本质的参与,新冠疫情推文揭示了什么?
Sci Educ (Dordr). 2022;31(2):293-323. doi: 10.1007/s11191-021-00233-y. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
4
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.系统评价与Meta分析优先报告条目:PRISMA声明
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.