Suppr超能文献

GP2017-HCF是一种高浓度制剂,其药代动力学、免疫原性和安全性与已获批的阿达木单抗生物类似药GP2017相似。

GP2017-HCF, a high concentration formulation, demonstrates similar pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity and safety to GP2017, an approved adalimumab biosimilar.

作者信息

von Richter Oliver, O'Reilly Terry, Guerrieri Davide, Fan Jamie, Fey Constanze, Schussler Steven, Furlan Fabricio, Lemke Lena

机构信息

Clinical Development Biopharmaceuticals, Hexal AG (a Sandoz company), Holzkirchen, Germany.

Celerion, Phoenix, AZ, USA.

出版信息

Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2023 Jul-Dec;23(8):749-758. doi: 10.1080/14712598.2022.2117546. Epub 2022 Aug 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

GP2017 is an adalimumab biosimilar. The objective of this study is to compare the pharmacokinetics (PK) of GP2017 in its approved formulation and GP2017-high concentration formulation (HCF) in a randomized, double-blind, two-arm PK bridging study.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Healthy male subjects received a single 40 mg subcutaneous injection of either GP2017-HCF (n = 162) or GP2017 (n = 168). PK, safety, and immunogenicity were assessed over 72 days post-injection.

RESULTS

The 90% confidence intervals [CIs] of geometric mean ratios between GP2017-HCF and GP2017 for C, AUC, AUC and AUC were within the pre-defined margin of 0.80 to 1.25; thus, PK comparability between GP2017-HCF and GP2017 was demonstrated. Subgroup analysis of PK comparability by anti-drug antibody (ADA) subpopulation showed that the 90% CIs of geometric mean ratios between GP2017-HCF and GP2017 for C, AUC, AUC and AUC were within the margin of 0.80 to 1.25 in ADA-positive and ADA-negative subjects. The proportions of subjects with positive ADA responses and with neutralizing antibodies were comparable between the GP2017-HCF and GP2017 groups. GP2017-HCF and GP2017 were well tolerated, and there were no reports of deaths or other serious adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Results show PK comparability between GP2017-HCF and GP2017 and comparable safety and tolerability.

摘要

背景

GP2017是一种阿达木单抗生物类似药。本研究的目的是在一项随机、双盲、双臂药代动力学(PK)桥接研究中比较GP2017批准剂型和GP2017高浓度剂型(HCF)的药代动力学。

研究设计与方法

健康男性受试者接受单次40mg皮下注射GP2017-HCF(n = 162)或GP2017(n = 168)。在注射后72天内评估药代动力学、安全性和免疫原性。

结果

GP2017-HCF与GP2017之间C、AUC、AUC和AUC的几何平均比值的90%置信区间(CIs)在预先定义的0.80至1.25范围内;因此,证明了GP2017-HCF与GP2017之间的药代动力学可比性。按抗药物抗体(ADA)亚组进行的药代动力学可比性亚组分析表明,在ADA阳性和ADA阴性受试者中,GP2017-HCF与GP2017之间C、AUC、AUC和AUC的几何平均比值的90% CIs在0.80至1.25范围内。GP2017-HCF组和GP2017组中ADA反应阳性和具有中和抗体的受试者比例相当。GP2017-HCF和GP2017耐受性良好,没有死亡或其他严重不良事件的报告。

结论

结果显示GP2017-HCF与GP2017之间药代动力学具有可比性,安全性和耐受性相当。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验