Suppr超能文献

经皮球囊扩张式与自膨式主动脉瓣置换术后 2 年的临床疗效:GALILEO 试验的亚组分析。

Two-year clinical outcomes after successful transcatheter aortic valve implantation with balloon-expandable versus self-expanding valves: A subanalysis of the GALILEO trial.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Oct;100(4):636-645. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30370. Epub 2022 Aug 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Midterm data comparing clinical outcomes after successful implantation of self-expanding and balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valves (THV) are limited. We aimed to compare 2-year outcomes after successful transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with the Edwards balloon-expandable or the Medtronic self-expanding THV.

METHODS

Two-year outcomes were analyzed according to the implanted THV in the GALILEO trial. Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) was a composite of all-cause death or thromboembolic events including stroke, myocardial infarction, symptomatic valve thrombosis, systemic embolism, deep-vein thrombosis, or pulmonary embolism.

RESULTS

Among 1644 patients recruited in 136 centers across 16 countries between 2015 and 2018, 499 received a self-expanding and 757 patients received a balloon-expandable THV. Patients treated with a self-expanding THV were more likely to be female, and had higher surgical risk, lower hemoglobin levels, and more frequent valve-in-valve procedures than those with a balloon-expandable THV. After multivariable adjustment, there were no significant differences in major clinical outcomes between self-expanding versus balloon-expandable THV: MACCE (17.0% vs. 13.4%, adjusted-hazard ratios [HR] 1.18, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.82-1.69); all-cause death (11.4% vs. 9.3%, adjusted-HR 1.26; 95% CI: 0.78-2.05); cardiovascular death (8.5% vs. 4.0%, adjusted-HR 1.53; 95% CI: 0.82-2.86), any stroke (5.1% vs. 3.7%, adjusted-HR 0.86; 95% CI: 0.43-1.73); major or life-threatening bleeding (5.9% vs. 6.8%, adjusted-HR 0.93; 95% CI: 0.53-1.63).

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

https://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov. NCT02556203.

CONCLUSIONS

Two-year follow-up data from the GALILEO trial indicate that successful TAVI either with self-expanding or balloon-expandable THVs according to physician discretion did not show difference in rates of MACCE.

摘要

背景

比较经导管心脏瓣膜(THV)成功植入后临床结果的中期数据有限。我们旨在比较经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVI)后使用 Edwards 球囊扩张型或 Medtronic 自扩张型 THV 的 2 年结果。

方法

根据 GALILEO 试验中植入的 THV 分析 2 年结果。主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCE)是指全因死亡或血栓栓塞事件的复合终点,包括卒、心肌梗死、有症状的瓣膜血栓形成、系统性栓塞、深静脉血栓形成或肺栓塞。

结果

在 2015 年至 2018 年间,在 16 个国家的 136 个中心共招募了 1644 例患者,其中 499 例接受了自扩张型 THV 治疗,757 例接受了球囊扩张型 THV 治疗。接受自扩张型 THV 治疗的患者更可能为女性,且手术风险更高,血红蛋白水平更低,并且比接受球囊扩张型 THV 治疗的患者更频繁地进行瓣膜内瓣置换术。多变量调整后,自扩张型 THV 与球囊扩张型 THV 之间的主要临床结局无显著差异:MACCE(17.0% vs. 13.4%,调整后的风险比[HR]1.18,95%置信区间[CI]:0.82-1.69);全因死亡(11.4% vs. 9.3%,调整后的 HR 1.26;95% CI:0.78-2.05);心血管死亡(8.5% vs. 4.0%,调整后的 HR 1.53;95% CI:0.82-2.86),任何卒(5.1% vs. 3.7%,调整后的 HR 0.86;95% CI:0.43-1.73);主要或危及生命的出血(5.9% vs. 6.8%,调整后的 HR 0.93;95% CI:0.53-1.63)。

临床试验注册

https://www.clinicaltrials.gov。NCT02556203。

结论

GALILEO 试验的 2 年随访数据表明,根据医生的判断,成功的 TAVI 无论是使用自扩张型还是球囊扩张型 THV,MACCE 发生率均无差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验