Suppr超能文献

既往植入左心耳封堵装置患者行激光球囊肺静脉隔离术的可行性与安全性

Feasibility and safety of laser balloon pulmonary vein isolation in patients with prior left atrial appendage occlusion device implantation.

作者信息

Khalil Charl, Vipparthy Sharath C, Kenigsberg David, Ravi Venkatesh, Lazar Sorin, Doukky Rami, Pietrasik Grzegorz, Wasserlauf Jeremiah, Larsen Timothy, Sharma Parikshit S, Huang Henry D

机构信息

Section of electrophysiology, Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, John H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2022 Nov;33(11):2389-2393. doi: 10.1111/jce.15666. Epub 2022 Sep 10.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

With the increasing adoption of left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) procedures and the eligibility of patients for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) post device placement, we examined the feasibility and safety of laser balloon (LB) for PVI in patients with prior LAAO.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined consecutive patients with paroxysmal or persistent, drug-resistant atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent LB PVI, after Watchman FLX device implantation at Rush University Medical Center between January 2020 and December 2021.

RESULTS

Seven patients (four persistent and three paroxysmal) with a mean age of 64 ± 11 years, predominantly male sex (86%), were included in the study. Two (29%) patients had prior cryoablation PVI with recurrence of AF. The mean CHA DS VASc is 2.6 ± 0.5 and the mean HAS-BLED score is 3.4 ± 0.8. The mean follow-up duration was 10 ± 7 months. The mean duration between Watchman FLX device implantation and LB PVI was 592 days. Acute first pass left pulmonary vein (PV) isolation was achieved in 100% of the procedures. There were no periprocedural complications such as death, pericardial tamponade or effusion, phrenic nerve injury, PV stenosis, device perforation or embolization, or worsening peri-device leak in any of the patients. None of the patients had AF recurrence after the blanking period.

CONCLUSION

LB PVI was safe and effective with 100% acute isolation of left-sided veins in patients with prior LAAO device.

摘要

引言

随着左心耳封堵(LAAO)手术的应用日益增多,以及患者在装置植入后符合肺静脉隔离(PVI)的条件,我们研究了激光球囊(LB)用于既往接受过LAAO的患者进行PVI的可行性和安全性。

方法

我们回顾性研究了2020年1月至2021年12月期间在拉什大学医学中心接受Watchman FLX装置植入后接受LB PVI的阵发性或持续性、药物难治性心房颤动(AF)的连续患者。

结果

7例患者(4例持续性和3例阵发性)纳入研究,平均年龄64±11岁,男性占主导(86%)。2例(29%)患者既往接受过冷冻消融PVI,AF复发。平均CHA₂DS₂-VASc评分为2.6±0.5,平均HAS-BLED评分为3.4±0.8。平均随访时间为10±7个月。Watchman FLX装置植入与LB PVI之间的平均间隔时间为592天。100%的手术实现了急性首次通过左肺静脉(PV)隔离。所有患者均未发生围手术期并发症,如死亡、心包填塞或积液、膈神经损伤、PV狭窄、装置穿孔或栓塞,或装置周围渗漏恶化。在空白期后,所有患者均未出现AF复发。

结论

对于既往有LAAO装置的患者,LB PVI安全有效,左侧静脉急性隔离率达100%。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验