Suppr超能文献

全膝关节置换术后僵硬行麻醉下早期手法松解可获得更大的膝关节屈曲度。

Early manipulation under anaesthesia for stiffness following total knee arthroplasty is associated with a greater gain in knee flexion.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Middlemore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Mar;31(3):979-985. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-07128-7. Epub 2022 Aug 30.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to identify the risk factors for manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and whether performing an 'early' MUA within 3 months leads to a greater improvement in range of motion.

METHODS

Primary TKAs performed between 2013 and 2018 at three tertiary New Zealand hospitals were reviewed with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Clinical details of patients who underwent MUA were reviewed to identify the knee flexion angle prior to and following MUA. Multivariate analysis identified the risk factors for undergoing MUA and compared flexion angles between 'early' (< 3 months) and 'late' MUA (> 3 months).

RESULTS

A total of 7386 primary TKAs were analysed in which 131 underwent an MUA (1.8%). Patients aged < 65 years were two times more likely to undergo MUA compared to patients aged ≥ 65 years (2.5 versus 1.3%, p < 0.001; adjusted HR = 2.1, p < 0.001). There was no difference in the final flexion angle post-MUA between early and late MUA (104.7° versus 104.1°, p = 0.819). However, patients who underwent early MUA had poorer pre-MUA flexion (72.3° versus 79.6°, p = 0.012), and subsequently had a greater overall gain in flexion compared to those who underwent late MUA (mean gain 33.1° versus 24.3°, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Younger age was the only patient risk factor for MUA. Patients who underwent early MUA had similar post-MUA flexion, but had poorer pre-MUA flexion compared to those who underwent late MUA. Subsequently, a greater overall gain in flexion was achieved in those who underwent early MUA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定全膝关节置换术(TKA)后行麻醉下手法松解术(MUA)的风险因素,以及在 3 个月内进行“早期”MUA 是否会带来更大的关节活动度改善。

方法

对 2013 年至 2018 年在新西兰三家三级医院进行的原发性 TKA 进行了回顾性研究,随访时间至少 1 年。对接受 MUA 的患者的临床资料进行了回顾,以确定 MUA 前后的膝关节屈曲角度。多变量分析确定了接受 MUA 的风险因素,并比较了“早期”(<3 个月)和“晚期”MUA(>3 个月)的屈曲角度。

结果

共分析了 7386 例原发性 TKA,其中 131 例接受了 MUA(1.8%)。与年龄≥65 岁的患者相比,年龄<65 岁的患者接受 MUA 的可能性是其两倍(2.5%比 1.3%,p<0.001;调整后的 HR=2.1,p<0.001)。早期和晚期 MUA 后最终的 MUA 后屈曲角度没有差异(104.7°比 104.1°,p=0.819)。然而,早期 MUA 患者 MUA 前的屈曲角度较差(72.3°比 79.6°,p=0.012),与晚期 MUA 相比,他们的整体屈曲度增加幅度更大(平均增加 33.1°比 24.3°,p<0.001)。

结论

年龄是 MUA 的唯一患者风险因素。早期 MUA 的患者术后的屈曲角度相似,但与晚期 MUA 的患者相比,他们的 MUA 前的屈曲角度较差。随后,早期 MUA 的患者整体屈曲度增加幅度更大。

证据水平

III。

相似文献

1
Early manipulation under anaesthesia for stiffness following total knee arthroplasty is associated with a greater gain in knee flexion.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Mar;31(3):979-985. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-07128-7. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
2
Risk Factors, Outcomes, and Timing of Manipulation Under Anesthesia After Total Knee Arthroplasty.
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jan;33(1):245-249. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.08.002. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
4
Predictors of outcome after manipulation under anaesthesia in patients with a stiff total knee arthroplasty.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Nov;25(11):3637-3643. doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-4413-6. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
7
Risk factors for failure of manipulation under anesthesia after total knee arthroplasty.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Aug;34(6):3061-3066. doi: 10.1007/s00590-024-03974-y. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
8
Manipulation under anesthesia after total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective study of 145 patients.
Acta Orthop. 2022 Jun 21;93:583-587. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2022.3167.
10
Prior Manipulation under Anesthesia is a Predictor of Contralateral Manipulation in Staged Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty.
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Nov;35(11):3285-3288. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.05.073. Epub 2020 Jun 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Manipulation Under Anesthesia and Stiffness After Total Knee Arthroplasty.
JBJS Rev. 2018 Apr;6(4):e2. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.17.00113.
2
Risk Factors, Outcomes, and Timing of Manipulation Under Anesthesia After Total Knee Arthroplasty.
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jan;33(1):245-249. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.08.002. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
3
Predictors of outcome after manipulation under anaesthesia in patients with a stiff total knee arthroplasty.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Nov;25(11):3637-3643. doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-4413-6. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
4
International consensus on the definition and classification of fibrosis of the knee joint.
Bone Joint J. 2016 Nov;98-B(11):1479-1488. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B10.37957.
5
Fibrosis is a common outcome following total knee arthroplasty.
Sci Rep. 2015 Nov 10;5:16469. doi: 10.1038/srep16469.
6
A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Total Knee Replacement.
N Engl J Med. 2015 Oct 22;373(17):1597-606. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1505467.
7
Manipulation Under Anesthesia After Total Knee Arthroplasty is Associated with An Increased Incidence of Subsequent Revision Surgery.
J Arthroplasty. 2015 Sep;30(9 Suppl):72-5. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.01.061. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
9
Do various factors affect the frequency of manipulation under anesthesia after primary total knee arthroplasty?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jan;473(1):143-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3772-x.
10
Risk factors for manipulation after total knee arthroplasty: a pooled electronic health record database study.
J Arthroplasty. 2014 Oct;29(10):2036-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.05.001. Epub 2014 May 9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验