Suppr超能文献

全膝关节置换术后的关节纤维性僵直——麻醉下手法松解后关节绝对屈曲度和屈曲度增加的影响因素。

Arthrofibrosis after TKA - Influence factors on the absolute flexion and gain in flexion after manipulation under anaesthesia.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic surgery, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str, 3, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011 Aug 12;12:184. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-184.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Stiffness with decreased range of motion (ROM) has been described as a frustrating complication after TKA. If all methods of physiotherapeutic treatment have been exhausted trying to develop ROM, manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA) can be discussed. The aim of the present study was to show the effect of MUA and to determine the influence of BMI, number of previous surgical procedures, pre-MUA ROM and timing of MUA for the results after MUA in regard to absolute flexion and gain in flexion.

METHODS

858 patients underwent TKA at our institution between 2004 and 2009. 39 of these patients underwent MUA because of postoperative knee stiffness. The data were retrospective analysed for the influence of BMI, pre-MUA flexion (</≥ 70°), timing of MUA (>/≤ 30 days after TKA) and number of previous surgery on the results after MUA (absolute Flexion/gain in flexion).

RESULTS

The prevalence for stiffness after TKA was 4.54%. There was a statistically significant improvement in flexion not only directly after MUA but also 6 weeks after MUA. Patients with two or more previous operations before TKA showed statistically significant worse results six weeks after MUA in absolute flexion and gain in flexion(p = 0.039) than patients with one or two previous operations. No statistical significance in absolute flexion (p = 0.655) and gain in flexion (p = 0.328) after MUA between "early" and "late" was detected. The stiffer knees with a flexion below 70° showed significantly worse results (p = 0.044) in absolute flexion six weeks after MUA, but they also had statistical statistically better results with regard to gain in flexion (p ≤ 0.001).

CONCLUSION

MUA is a good instrument for improving ROM after TKA. The time between TKA and MUA seems less important, so different types of physiotherapeutic treatment could be tried before the procedure is started. MUA in patients with many previous operations and a flexion of less than 70° before MUA is not as effective as in other patients, but they also benefit from MUA.

摘要

背景

在 TKA 后,关节僵硬伴活动度(ROM)减少已被描述为一种令人沮丧的并发症。如果已经用尽了所有的物理治疗方法来改善 ROM,可以考虑在麻醉下进行手法松解(MUA)。本研究的目的是展示 MUA 的效果,并确定 BMI、既往手术次数、MUA 前 ROM 和 MUA 时间对 MUA 后绝对屈曲度和屈曲度增加的影响。

方法

2004 年至 2009 年,我院对 858 例患者进行了 TKA,其中 39 例因术后膝关节僵硬而接受 MUA。回顾性分析了 BMI、MUA 前屈曲度(</≥ 70°)、MUA 时间(TKA 后>/≤ 30 天)和既往手术次数对 MUA 后结果(绝对屈曲度/屈曲度增加)的影响。

结果

TKA 后僵硬的发生率为 4.54%。MUA 后不仅直接改善了膝关节的屈曲度,而且 6 周后也有明显改善。与既往手术次数为 1 或 2 次的患者相比,TKA 前有 2 次或更多既往手术的患者,MUA 后 6 周时绝对屈曲度和屈曲度增加的结果明显更差(p = 0.039)。在 MUA 后 6 周时,“早期”和“晚期”的绝对屈曲度(p = 0.655)和屈曲度增加(p = 0.328)之间无统计学意义。MUA 前屈曲度低于 70°的僵硬膝关节在 MUA 后 6 周时绝对屈曲度的结果明显更差(p = 0.044),但在屈曲度增加方面也有统计学意义上的更好结果(p ≤ 0.001)。

结论

MUA 是改善 TKA 后 ROM 的有效方法。TKA 和 MUA 之间的时间似乎并不重要,因此在开始手术前可以尝试不同类型的物理治疗。与其他患者相比,既往手术次数多且 MUA 前屈曲度小于 70°的患者,MUA 的效果不如其他患者,但他们也从 MUA 中获益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fea/3175211/d48304266863/1471-2474-12-184-1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验