• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The regulation of artificial intelligence for health in Brazil begins with the General Personal Data Protection Law.巴西对健康领域人工智能的监管始于《一般个人数据保护法》。
Rev Saude Publica. 2022 Sep 12;56:80. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2022056004461. eCollection 2022.
2
Digital Platform for Continuous Monitoring of Patients Using a Smartwatch: Longitudinal Prospective Cohort Study.使用智能手表对患者进行持续监测的数字平台:纵向前瞻性队列研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Sep 12;7:e47388. doi: 10.2196/47388.
3
Ethics and artificial intelligence.伦理学与人工智能。
Rev Clin Esp (Barc). 2024 Mar;224(3):178-186. doi: 10.1016/j.rceng.2024.02.003. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
4
Perceptions of ICT Practitioners Regarding Software Privacy.信息通信技术从业者对软件隐私的看法。
Entropy (Basel). 2020 Apr 10;22(4):429. doi: 10.3390/e22040429.
5
Population Preferences for Performance and Explainability of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care: Choice-Based Conjoint Survey.人群对医疗人工智能性能和可解释性的偏好:基于选择的联合调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Dec 13;23(12):e26611. doi: 10.2196/26611.
6
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICAL PRACTICE: REGULATIVE ISSUES AND PERSPECTIVES.人工智能在医学实践中的应用:监管问题与展望。
Wiad Lek. 2020;73(12 cz 2):2722-2727.
7
Trading off accuracy and explainability in AI decision-making: findings from 2 citizens' juries.权衡人工智能决策中的准确性和可解释性:来自 2 个公民陪审团的发现。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Sep 18;28(10):2128-2138. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab127.
8
Delivering personalized medicine in retinal care: from artificial intelligence algorithms to clinical application.在视网膜护理中提供个性化医疗:从人工智能算法到临床应用。
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2020 Sep;31(5):329-336. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000677.
9
The role of explainability in creating trustworthy artificial intelligence for health care: A comprehensive survey of the terminology, design choices, and evaluation strategies.可解释性在医疗保健人工智能可信性构建中的作用:术语、设计选择和评估策略的全面调查。
J Biomed Inform. 2021 Jan;113:103655. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103655. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
10
Investigating the use of data-driven artificial intelligence in computerised decision support systems for health and social care: A systematic review.调查数据驱动的人工智能在健康和社会护理计算机化决策支持系统中的应用:一项系统综述。
Health Informatics J. 2020 Sep;26(3):2138-2147. doi: 10.1177/1460458219900452. Epub 2020 Jan 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of machine learning in occupational risk communication for healthcare workers: protocol for scoping review.机器学习在医护人员职业风险沟通中的应用:范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 8;15(1):e088729. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088729.

本文引用的文献

1
Artificial Intelligence in Liver Transplantation.人工智能在肝移植中的应用。
Transplant Proc. 2021 Dec;53(10):2939-2944. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2021.09.045. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
2
The false hope of current approaches to explainable artificial intelligence in health care.当前医疗保健中可解释人工智能方法的虚假希望。
Lancet Digit Health. 2021 Nov;3(11):e745-e750. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00208-9.
3
Machine Learning in Medicine.医学中的机器学习
N Engl J Med. 2019 Apr 4;380(14):1347-1358. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1814259.
4
Clinical applications of machine learning algorithms: beyond the black box.机器学习算法的临床应用:超越黑箱效应
BMJ. 2019 Mar 12;364:l886. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l886.
5
Artificial Intelligence and Black-Box Medical Decisions: Accuracy versus Explainability.人工智能与医疗决策的黑箱:准确性与可解释性
Hastings Cent Rep. 2019 Jan;49(1):15-21. doi: 10.1002/hast.973.
6
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence.高性能医学:人机智能融合。
Nat Med. 2019 Jan;25(1):44-56. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0300-7. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
7
Machine learning in medicine: Addressing ethical challenges.机器学习在医学中的应用:应对伦理挑战。
PLoS Med. 2018 Nov 6;15(11):e1002689. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002689. eCollection 2018 Nov.
8
Health Regulation for the Digital Age - Correcting the Mismatch.数字时代的健康监管——纠正错配
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 1;379(18):1694-1695. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1806848.
9
Predicting the Future - Big Data, Machine Learning, and Clinical Medicine.预测未来——大数据、机器学习与临床医学。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Sep 29;375(13):1216-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1606181.

巴西对健康领域人工智能的监管始于《一般个人数据保护法》。

The regulation of artificial intelligence for health in Brazil begins with the General Personal Data Protection Law.

机构信息

Universidade de São Paulo. Centro de Pesquisa em Direito Sanitário. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Coletiva. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

出版信息

Rev Saude Publica. 2022 Sep 12;56:80. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2022056004461. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.11606/s1518-8787.2022056004461
PMID:36043658
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9423092/
Abstract

Artificial intelligence develops rapidly and health is one of the areas where new technologies in this field are most promising. The use of artificial intelligence can modify the way health care and self-care are provided, besides influencing the organization of health systems. Therefore, the regulation of artificial intelligence in healthcare is an emerging and essential topic. Specific laws and regulations are being developed around the world. In Brazil, the starting point of this regulation is the Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais (LGPD - General Personal Data Protection Law), which recognizes the right to explanation and review of automated decisions. Discussing the scope of this right is needed, considering the necessary instrumentalization of transparency in the use of artificial intelligence for health and the currently existing limits, such as the black-box system inherent to algorithms and the trade-off between explainability and accuracy of automated systems.

摘要

人工智能发展迅速,健康是该领域新技术最有前途的领域之一。人工智能的使用不仅可以改变医疗保健和自我保健的提供方式,还可以影响卫生系统的组织。因此,人工智能在医疗保健中的监管是一个新兴且必不可少的话题。世界各地都在制定具体的法律法规。在巴西,这项监管的起点是 Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais (LGPD - 一般个人数据保护法),该法承认解释和审查自动化决策的权利。有必要讨论这一权利的范围,考虑到在健康领域使用人工智能需要实现透明度的工具化,以及当前存在的限制,例如算法固有的黑箱系统以及自动化系统的可解释性和准确性之间的权衡。