MD, MSc. Musculoskeletal Radiologist, WEBIMAGEM Telerradiologia, São Paulo (SP), Brazil. Doctoral student in Evidence-based Health Program, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo (SP), Brazil.
MD, MSc. Radiologist, Centro de Aperfeiçoamento e Pesquisa em Ultrassonografia Prof. Dr. Giovanni Guido Cerri (DASA), Ultrasonography, São Paulo, Brazil. Doctoral Student in Evidence-based Health Program, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo (SP), Brazil.
Sao Paulo Med J. 2022 Aug 29;141(2):154-167. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2021.0852.13062022. eCollection 2022.
Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) encompasses a broad spectrum of hip pathologies, including femoral or acetabular dysplasia, hip instability, or both. According to the medical literature, ultrasonography is the most reliable diagnostic method for DDH. Several techniques for the assessment of hips in newborns and infants, using ultrasonography, have been described.
To compare the accuracy of the Graf technique and other diagnostic techniques for DDH.
A systematic review of studies that analyzed ultrasound techniques for the diagnosis of DDH within an evidence-based health program of a federal university in São Paulo (SP), Brazil.
A systematic search of relevant literature was conducted in the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and LILACS databases for articles published up to May 5, 2020, relating to studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of different ultrasound techniques for diagnosing DDH. The QUADAS 2 tool was used for methodological quality evaluation.
All hips were analyzed using the Graf method as a reference standard. The Morin technique had the highest rate of sensitivity, at 81.12-89.47%. The Suzuki and Stress tests showed 100% specificity. The Harcke technique showed a sensibility of 18.21% and specificity of 99.32%.
All the techniques demonstrated at least one rate (sensibility and specificity) lower than 90.00% when compared to the Graf method. The Morin technique, as evaluated in this systematic review, is recommended after the Graf method because it has the highest sensitivity, especially with the three-pattern classification of 89.47%.
Identifier: CRD42020189686 at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (identifier: CRD42020189686).
发育性髋关节发育不良(DDH)涵盖了广泛的髋关节病理,包括股骨或髋臼发育不良、髋关节不稳定或两者兼有。根据医学文献,超声检查是 DDH 最可靠的诊断方法。已经描述了几种使用超声评估新生儿和婴儿髋关节的技术。
比较 Graf 技术和其他 DDH 诊断技术的准确性。
对巴西圣保罗联邦大学循证卫生计划内的超声技术诊断 DDH 的研究进行系统评价。
在 PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane 图书馆、CINAHL 和 LILACS 数据库中对截至 2020 年 5 月 5 日发表的与评估不同超声技术诊断 DDH 的诊断准确性相关的文章进行系统检索。使用 QUADAS 2 工具进行方法学质量评估。
所有髋关节均采用 Graf 方法作为参考标准进行分析。Morin 技术的敏感性最高,为 81.12-89.47%。Suzuki 和 Stress 试验的特异性为 100%。Harcke 技术的敏感性为 18.21%,特异性为 99.32%。
与 Graf 方法相比,所有技术的敏感性和特异性均至少有一个低于 90.00%。在本系统评价中评估的 Morin 技术,是在 Graf 方法之后推荐的,因为它具有最高的敏感性,尤其是在 89.47%的三模式分类中。
标识符:CRD42020189686 于国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(标识符:CRD42020189686)。