• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

真词的感知与产生中的内外效应。

The In-Out Effect in the Perception and Production of Real Words.

机构信息

Department of Communication and Cognition, Tilburg School of Humanities and Digital Sciences, Tilburg University.

出版信息

Cogn Sci. 2022 Sep;46(9):e13193. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13193.

DOI:10.1111/cogs.13193
PMID:36044014
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9541009/
Abstract

The in-out effect refers to the tendency that novel words whose consonants follow an inward-wandering pattern (e.g., P-T-K) are rated more positively than stimuli whose consonants follow an outward-wandering pattern (e.g., K-T-P). While this effect appears to be reliable, it is not yet clear to what extent it generalizes to existing words in a language. In two large-scale studies, we sought to extend the in-out effect from pseudowords to real words and from perception to production. In Study 1, we investigated whether previously collected affective ratings for English and Dutch words were more positive for inward-wandering words and more negative for outward-wandering words. No systematic relationship between wandering direction and affective valence was found. In Study 2, we investigated whether inward-wandering words are more likely to occur in positive online consumer restaurant reviews written in English and Dutch, compared to negative reviews, and whether this association was stronger for food ratings than for decor ratings. Again, no systematic relationship between wandering direction and review rating emerged. We suggest that the affective states triggered by different consonantal wandering directions might be used as a cue for forming judgments in the absence of other information, but that wandering direction is too low in salience to drive the shape of words in the lexicon.

摘要

内外效应指的是,当一个新单词的辅音呈现出向内曲折的模式(如 P-T-K)时,该单词会比那些呈现出向外曲折模式(如 K-T-P)的刺激物得到更高的评价。虽然这种效应似乎是可靠的,但它在多大程度上适用于语言中现有的单词还不清楚。在两项大规模研究中,我们试图将内外效应从假词扩展到真词,从感知扩展到产生。在研究 1 中,我们调查了英语和荷兰语单词的先前收集的情感评价是否对向内曲折的单词更积极,对向外曲折的单词更消极。我们没有发现曲折方向和情感效价之间存在系统的关系。在研究 2 中,我们调查了与负面评价相比,英语和荷兰语的在线消费者餐厅评价中,积极评价中是否更有可能出现向内曲折的单词,而对于食物评价的这种关联是否比对于装饰评价的关联更强。同样,我们也没有发现曲折方向和评论评分之间存在系统的关系。我们认为,不同辅音曲折方向所引发的情感状态可能被用作在缺乏其他信息的情况下形成判断的线索,但曲折方向的显著性太低,无法影响词汇中的单词形状。

相似文献

1
The In-Out Effect in the Perception and Production of Real Words.真词的感知与产生中的内外效应。
Cogn Sci. 2022 Sep;46(9):e13193. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13193.
2
Mouth-watering words: Articulatory inductions of eating-like mouth movements increase perceived food palatability.令人垂涎的言语:类似进食的口部动作的发音诱导会增加对食物美味的感知。
Appetite. 2016 Apr 1;99:112-120. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.01.018. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
3
Sound symbolic associations in Spanish emotional words: affective dimensions and discrete emotions.西班牙语情感词汇中的语音象征联想:情感维度与离散情绪
Cogn Emot. 2024 Apr 25:1-17. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2024.2345377.
4
The in-out effect: examining the role of perceptual fluency in the preference for words with inward-wandering consonantal articulation.内外效应:检验感知流畅度在对内向型辅音发音的单词偏好中的作用。
Psychol Res. 2021 Feb;85(1):112-120. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01238-7. Epub 2019 Aug 10.
5
Affective Norms for Italian Words in Older Adults: Age Differences in Ratings of Valence, Arousal and Dominance.老年人意大利语词汇的情感规范:效价、唤醒和支配评级中的年龄差异
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 3;12(1):e0169472. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169472. eCollection 2017.
6
Matching between oral inward-outward movements of object names and oral movements associated with denoted objects.物体名称的口部向内-向外动作与所指物体相关的口部动作之间的匹配。
Cogn Emot. 2017 Jan;31(1):3-18. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2015.1073692. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
7
Affective and concreteness norms for 3,022 Croatian words.3022个克罗地亚语单词的情感和具体性规范。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Sep;72(9):2302-2312. doi: 10.1177/1747021819834226. Epub 2019 Mar 11.
8
Turkish Emotional Word Norms for Arousal, Valence, and Discrete Emotion Categories.土耳其情绪词唤醒度、效价和离散情绪类别常模。
Psychol Rep. 2021 Feb;124(1):188-209. doi: 10.1177/0033294118814722. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
9
The role of fluency in preferences for inward over outward words.流畅性在对内向型词汇而非外向型词汇的偏好中的作用。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2016 Nov;171:110-117. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.10.006. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
10
Oral approach-avoidance: affective consequences of muscular articulation dynamics.口腔趋近-回避:肌肉发声动力学的情感后果。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2014 Jun;106(6):885-96. doi: 10.1037/a0036477.

本文引用的文献

1
The articulatory in-out effect: replicable, but inexplicable.发音的进出效应:可复制,但无法解释。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2022 Jan;26(1):8-10. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2021.10.008. Epub 2021 Oct 30.
2
What is preferred in the in-out effect: articulation locations or articulation movement direction?在进出效应中,更倾向于使用发音位置还是发音运动方向?
Cogn Emot. 2022 Mar;36(2):230-239. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2021.1996336. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
3
The articulatory in-out effect: Driven by consonant preferences?发音的出-入效果:受辅音偏好驱动?
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2022 Feb;122(2):e1-e10. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000276. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
4
Front in the mouth, front in the word: The driving mechanisms of the in-out effect.口前、词前:进出效应的驱动机制。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020 Oct;119(4):792-807. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000196. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
5
Oral Approach Avoidance.口头趋近-回避
Exp Psychol. 2019 Sep;66(5):355-360. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000458.
6
The in-out effect: examining the role of perceptual fluency in the preference for words with inward-wandering consonantal articulation.内外效应:检验感知流畅度在对内向型辅音发音的单词偏好中的作用。
Psychol Res. 2021 Feb;85(1):112-120. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01238-7. Epub 2019 Aug 10.
7
Training articulation sequences: A first systematic modulation of the articulatory in-out effect.训练发音序列:对发音进出效应的首次系统调制。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Oct;45(10):1725-1732. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000669. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
8
Language is more abstract than you think, or, why aren't languages more iconic?语言比你想象的更抽象,或者,为什么语言不更具象似性呢?
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 Aug 5;373(1752). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0137.
9
Why 'piss' is ruder than 'pee'? The role of sound in affective meaning making.为什么“piss”比“pee”更粗俗?声音在情感意义表达中的作用。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 6;13(6):e0198430. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198430. eCollection 2018.
10
Emotional sound symbolism: Languages rapidly signal valence via phonemes.情绪声音象征:语言通过音位快速传递情感。
Cognition. 2018 Jun;175:122-130. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.02.007. Epub 2018 Mar 16.