Middle meatus nasal cytology compared to inferior turbinate cytology in non allergic rhinitis.

PURPOSE

Non allergic rhinitis (NAR) comprises different clinical definitions and phenotypes, including non inflammatory non allergic (NINAR) and cellular inflammatory forms. Nasal cytology, usually performed by scraping the inferior turbinate, is a non invasive, cheap and point-of-care tool to distinguish among the different NAR phenotypes, but still a relevant proportion of patients evaluated by nasal cytology receive a non precise definition of NAR phenotype. We hypothesize that collecting nasal cytology samples from middle meatus could increase the diagnostic accuracy.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with chronic rhinitis without evidence of allergic sensitization were assessed for nasal cytology by means of scraping both the inferior turbinate and the middle meatus (lateral-inferior wall of the middle turbinate).

RESULTS

107 consecutive patients with NAR were enrolled in the study. According to inferior turbinate cytology, 42.1% were defined as affected by NINAR, 2.8% by bacterial rhinitis, 10.3% by non allergic rhinitis with eosinophils (NARES), 15.0% non allergic rhinitis with neutrophils (NARNE), 19.6% non allergic rhinitis with mast-cells (NARMA) and 10.3% non allergic rhinitis with eosinophils and mast-cells (NARESMA). Middle meatus cytology was in accordance with inferior turbinate cytology in only 37.6% of cases. Eosinophils and mast-cells were detectable more frequently in middle meatus samples (49.5% vs 19.6%, p < 0.01, 59.8% vs 29.9%, p < 0.01, respectively). 93.3% of NINAR patients received an inflammatory NAR phenotype at middle meatus cytology: 26.7% NARES, 24.4% NARNE, 31.1% NARMA and 11.1% NARESMA.

CONCLUSION

Middle meatus cytology is more reliable than inferior turbinate cytology in phenotyping patients with NAR. Our study strengthen that nasal cytology should be implemented in clinical practice collecting samples at the middle meatus level.