Suppr超能文献

肺内潮气量顺应性和总的呼吸系统顺应性。

Intratidal compliance of the lung and the total respiratory system.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany.

出版信息

Physiol Meas. 2022 Sep 26;43(9). doi: 10.1088/1361-6579/ac8e4d.

Abstract

The worldwide rising quantity of surgeries and the corresponding need of mechanical ventilation means a rising number of patients are at risk of suffering from post-operative pulmonary complications. To prevent this risk, individual mechanics of the lung should be considered when setting the parameters of mechanical ventilation. Intratidal compliance analysis based on transpulmonal pressure would provide an estimate for individual lung mechanics. The downside of such measure, however, is its invasiveness. Accurate measurement requires recording of the esophageal pressure as surrogate for the actual pleural pressure. Measuring pressure at the airway opening is considerably easier, but the resulting mechanics of the respiratory system may not represent the actual lung mechanics in a straightforward fashion.In order to evaluate if the mechanics of the lungs are represented by analysis of the mechanics of the respiratory system we determined intratidal dynamic compliance-volume profiles of both in 23 lung-healthy mechanically ventilated patients undergoing elective surgery. We also compared the accuracy of the compliance profiles resulting from analysis of the total breath with those resulting from the analysis of inspiration data only.When the whole breath was analyzed 54.3%, and with only inspiration data 69.6%, of compliance profiles of the respiratory system matched those of the lung. With both approaches profiles of the lung and the respiratory system matched or deviated by only one neighboring step (75% whole breath, 91.3% inspiration only), and never contradicted each other.Compliance profiles calculated from volume and pressure data of the respiratory system are an adequate surrogate for the compliance profiles of the lungs of lung-healthy patients. Therefore, invasive assessment of esophageal pressure for achievement of intrapleural pressure is unnecessary. The compliance profiles based on only inspiratory data appear more sensitive for indicating intratidal derecruitment than those based on data of the whole breath.

摘要

全球手术数量的增加以及随之而来的机械通气需求意味着越来越多的患者有发生术后肺部并发症的风险。为了预防这种风险,在设置机械通气参数时应考虑肺部的个体力学特性。基于跨肺压的潮气量顺应性分析可为个体肺力学提供估计。然而,这种测量方法的缺点是其侵入性。准确测量需要记录食管压作为实际胸膜压的替代值。测量气道开口处的压力要容易得多,但由此产生的呼吸系统力学可能不能直接代表实际的肺部力学。为了评估肺部力学是否可以通过呼吸系统力学分析来表示,我们在 23 名接受择期手术的肺健康机械通气患者中同时确定了这两种方法的潮气量动态顺应性-容积曲线。我们还比较了分析整个呼吸时和仅分析吸气数据时得出的顺应性曲线的准确性。当分析整个呼吸时,呼吸系统的顺应性曲线中有 54.3%与肺的顺应性曲线相匹配,而仅分析吸气数据时,呼吸系统的顺应性曲线中有 69.6%与肺的顺应性曲线相匹配。两种方法得到的肺和呼吸系统的曲线都只相差一个相邻的步骤(整个呼吸的 75%,仅吸气的 91.3%),并且从不相互矛盾。从呼吸系统的容积和压力数据计算得到的顺应性曲线是肺健康患者肺顺应性曲线的合适替代物。因此,为了实现胸膜内压,对食管压进行侵入性评估是不必要的。仅基于吸气数据的顺应性曲线比基于整个呼吸数据的顺应性曲线更能敏感地提示潮气量期间的去复张。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验