Suppr超能文献

共同信号假说:面部和身体表情的情绪相互告知对方。

The shared signal hypothesis: Facial and bodily expressions of emotion mutually inform one another.

机构信息

Booth School of Business, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

Department of School Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.

出版信息

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Oct;84(7):2271-2280. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02548-6. Epub 2022 Aug 31.

Abstract

Decades of research show that contextual information from the body, visual scene, and voices can facilitate judgments of facial expressions of emotion. To date, most research suggests that bodily expressions of emotion offer context for interpreting facial expressions, but not vice versa. The present research aimed to investigate the conditions under which mutual processing of facial and bodily displays of emotion facilitate and/or interfere with emotion recognition. In the current two studies, we examined whether body and face emotion recognition are enhanced through integration of shared emotion cues, and/or hindered through mixed signals (i.e., interference). We tested whether faces and bodies facilitate or interfere with emotion processing by pairing briefly presented (33 ms), backward-masked presentations of faces with supraliminally presented bodies (Experiment 1) and vice versa (Experiment 2). Both studies revealed strong support for integration effects, but not interference. Integration effects are most pronounced for low-emotional clarity facial and bodily expressions, suggesting that when more information is needed in one channel, the other channel is recruited to disentangle any ambiguity. That this occurs for briefly presented, backward-masked presentations reveals low-level visual integration of shared emotional signal value.

摘要

几十年来的研究表明,来自身体、视觉场景和声音的上下文信息可以帮助判断面部表情的情绪。迄今为止,大多数研究表明,身体的情绪表达为解释面部表情提供了背景,但反之则不然。本研究旨在探讨面部和身体表情相互处理在何种条件下促进和/或干扰情绪识别。在当前的两项研究中,我们检验了通过整合共同的情绪线索,身体和面部的情绪识别是否会增强,以及通过混合信号(即干扰)是否会受到阻碍。我们通过将短暂呈现(33 毫秒)、掩蔽后的面孔与超阈限呈现的身体进行配对(实验 1)以及反之(实验 2)来测试面孔和身体是否会促进或干扰情绪处理。两项研究都强烈支持整合效应,而不是干扰。对于低情绪清晰度的面部和身体表情,整合效应最为明显,这表明当一个通道需要更多信息时,另一个通道会被招募来消除任何歧义。这种情况在短暂呈现、掩蔽后的呈现中发生,表明共享情绪信号值的低级视觉整合。

相似文献

3
Gaze patterns in viewing static and dynamic body expressions.观看静态和动态身体表情时的注视模式。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2019 Jul;198:102862. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.05.014. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
8
Social context influences recognition of bodily expressions.社会环境会影响对身体表情的识别。
Exp Brain Res. 2010 May;203(1):169-80. doi: 10.1007/s00221-010-2220-8. Epub 2010 Apr 17.

本文引用的文献

4
The Emotional-Ambiguity Hypothesis: A Large-Scale Test.情感歧义假说:大规模测试
Psychol Sci. 2018 Oct;29(10):1706-1715. doi: 10.1177/0956797618780353. Epub 2018 Aug 21.
5
Effects of Face and Background Color on Facial Expression Perception.面部和背景颜色对表情感知的影响。
Front Psychol. 2018 Jun 21;9:1012. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01012. eCollection 2018.
9
Face-body integration of intense emotional expressions of victory and defeat.胜利与失败强烈情感表达的面部与身体整合
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 28;12(2):e0171656. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171656. eCollection 2017.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验