Suppr超能文献

高反应者新鲜自体周期中促性腺激素释放激素激动剂与人类绒毛膜促性腺激素的双重触发:一项系统评价

Dual Trigger with Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone Agonist and Human Chorionic Gonadotropin of Fresh Autologous Cycles in High Responders: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Vyrides Andreas A, Mahdi Essam El, Lamnisos Demetris, Giannakou Konstantinos

机构信息

Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Newham University Hospital NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Reprod Infertil. 2022 Jan-Mar;23(1):3-17. doi: 10.18502/jri.v23i1.8446.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the current study was to investigate the effect of co-administration of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) with gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) trigger (dual trigger) in high responders for fresh autologous cycles in order to investigate the pregnancy outcomes and rates of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in comparison to GnRH-a trigger alone.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed in PubMed and Ovid MEDLINE from inception through February 2020. The included materials were case-control, cohort and, cross-sectional studies as well as clinical trials in which the outcomes of dual trigger with GnRH-a were compared for final oocyte maturation in high responders undergoing GnRH-ant cycles.

RESULTS

Five retrospective studies were included for this review. Three of the studies showed that the use of dual trigger versus GnRH-a trigger resulted in no statistically significant difference in rates of OHSS while achieving a statistically significant difference in favor of the dual trigger group in ongoing pregnancy rates, early pregnancy loss, and fertilization rates.

CONCLUSION

Currently, there is insufficient evidence to support improved clinical pregnancy rate, fertilization rate, live birth rate, and early pregnancy loss rate by the use of dual trigger versus GnRH-a trigger. Larger double-blind clinical studies are required to properly evaluate the efficacy of this protocol for use in high responders.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是调查在高反应者的新鲜自体周期中,将人绒毛膜促性腺激素(hCG)与促性腺激素释放激素激动剂(GnRH-a)联合触发(双重触发)的效果,以便与单独使用GnRH-a触发相比,研究妊娠结局和卵巢过度刺激综合征(OHSS)的发生率。

方法

从创刊至2020年2月,在PubMed和Ovid MEDLINE中进行了系统检索。纳入的资料包括病例对照研究、队列研究、横断面研究以及临床试验,其中比较了在接受GnRH拮抗剂周期的高反应者中,GnRH-a双重触发用于最终卵母细胞成熟的结局。

结果

本综述纳入了五项回顾性研究。其中三项研究表明,与GnRH-a触发相比,使用双重触发在OHSS发生率上无统计学显著差异,而在持续妊娠率、早期妊娠丢失率和受精率方面,双重触发组有统计学显著差异。

结论

目前,没有足够的证据支持与GnRH-a触发相比,使用双重触发能提高临床妊娠率、受精率、活产率和降低早期妊娠丢失率。需要更大规模的双盲临床研究来正确评估该方案在高反应者中的疗效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ba6/9361727/0f33783206da/JRI-23-3-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验