Lagos-Castillo Moraima, Guevara-Vizcarra María, Paredes-Campos Felipe, Kosuri Sathyatej, Vilchez Gustavo
Medical Technology, Universidad Nacional Federico Villareal, Lima, PER.
Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidad Nacional Federico Villareal, Lima, PER.
Cureus. 2022 Jul 27;14(7):e27364. doi: 10.7759/cureus.27364. eCollection 2022 Jul.
Objective This study was aimed at analyzing the validity and reliability of the Papanicolaou (Pap) test and visual inspection with acetic acid (VIAA) tests for cervical dysplasia screenings during the COVID-19 pandemic. Material and methods This was a retrospective study of patients 21 years or older seen at the Luis Negreiros Primary Care Center in Lima, Peru between 2020 and 2021, who underwent cervical dysplasia screening (Pap or VIAA). Relevant information regarding patient age, date of service, and Pap and VIAA results were collected. Parallel form reliability was analyzed with chi-square tests, and phi, contingency and Cramer's V coefficients. The validity of these tests was analyzed through the calculation of the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values with confidence intervals. A p-value less than 0.05 indicated statistical significance. Results From 4,503 records, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for Pap were 0.87 (0.81-0.92), 1.0 (1.0-1.0), 1.0 (1.0-1.0) and 0.99 (0.98-0.99), respectively, and those for VIAA were 0.22 (0.14-0.31), 0.10 (0.10-0.10), 0.53 (0.38-0.69) and 0.10 (0.10-0.10), respectively. Test validity varied slightly according to patient age and the year of testing. The correlation, although significant, was inverse; chi-square = 39.18, p <0.001, phi = -0.60, contingency = 0.51 and Cramer's V = -0.59. Conclusion The validity and reliability of Pap testing and VIAA for cervical dysplasia screening significantly decreased during the COVID-19 pandemic. The correlation between these tests, although significant, was inverse. More larger-scale studies are needed to confirm these findings and understand the reasons underlying the decreased effectiveness of these tests.
目的 本研究旨在分析在COVID-19大流行期间,巴氏涂片检查(Pap)和醋酸肉眼观察法(VIAA)用于宫颈发育异常筛查的有效性和可靠性。
材料与方法 这是一项对2020年至2021年间在秘鲁利马的路易斯·内格雷罗斯初级保健中心就诊的21岁及以上接受宫颈发育异常筛查(Pap或VIAA)的患者进行的回顾性研究。收集了患者年龄、服务日期以及Pap和VIAA结果的相关信息。使用卡方检验、phi系数、列联系数和克莱默V系数分析平行形式可靠性。通过计算敏感性、特异性以及带有置信区间的阳性和阴性预测值来分析这些检查的有效性。p值小于0.05表示具有统计学意义。
结果 从4503份记录来看,Pap检查的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值分别为0.87(0.81 - 0.92)、1.0(1.0 - 1.0)、1.0(1.0 - 1.0)和0.99(0.98 - 0.99),VIAA检查的相应值分别为0.22(0.14 - 0.31)、0.10(0.10 - 0.10)、0.53(0.38 - 0.69)和0.10(0.10 - 0.10)。检查有效性根据患者年龄和检查年份略有不同。相关性虽显著,但呈负相关;卡方 = 39.18,p < 0.001,phi = -0.60,列联系数 = 0.51,克莱默V = -0.59。
结论 在COVID-19大流行期间,Pap检查和VIAA用于宫颈发育异常筛查的有效性和可靠性显著下降。这些检查之间的相关性虽显著,但呈负相关。需要更多大规模研究来证实这些发现并了解这些检查有效性下降的潜在原因。