Department of Gastroenterology, Toranomon Hospital, Japan.
Intern Med. 2023 Apr 1;62(7):963-972. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.9759-22. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
Objective Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for gastric cancer in the remnant stomach poses some specific technical difficulties due to severe fibrosis and the presence of surgical staples. Therefore, we clarified the feasibility and safety of removing staples. Methods We retrospectively analyzed ESD outcomes of cases of gastric cancer in the remnant stomach. Materials This study reviewed 227 patients who underwent ESD for gastric cancer in the remnant stomach or gastric conduit. Patients were divided into those in whom resection extended to the anastomotic site or suture line (AS group; n=90) and those without such extension (non-AS group; n=137). The AS group was further divided into cases in which staples were removed (staple group; n=22) and those in which they were not (control group; n=68). Results The rates of specimen damage and curative resection and the duration and speed of the procedure were significantly worse in the AS group than the non-AS group. There were no significant differences between the staple group and the control group in the curative or complete resection rates, and no complications occurred in the staple group. In a propensity score-matched analysis, the rate of specimen damage was significantly lower in the staple group than in the control group (p=0.002), and the procedure speed tended to be faster (p=0.077). Conclusion Staple removal may improve the outcomes of ESD in patients with gastric cancer in the remnant stomach or gastric conduit by reducing the risk of specimen damage and increasing the procedure speed without complications.
目的 由于严重的纤维化和手术吻合钉的存在,残胃中的胃癌内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)存在一些特定的技术难题。因此,我们明确了去除吻合钉的可行性和安全性。
方法 我们回顾性分析了残胃或胃管中胃癌行 ESD 的病例。
材料 本研究回顾性分析了 227 例残胃或胃管中胃癌行 ESD 的患者。患者分为吻合口或缝线延伸至切除部位(AS 组;n=90)和未延伸至吻合口或缝线的患者(非 AS 组;n=137)。AS 组进一步分为吻合钉切除组(吻合钉组;n=22)和未切除吻合钉组(对照组;n=68)。
结果 AS 组标本损伤率、根治性切除率以及操作时间和速度明显低于非 AS 组。吻合钉组与对照组在根治性或完全切除率方面无显著差异,且吻合钉组无并发症发生。倾向性评分匹配分析显示,吻合钉组标本损伤率明显低于对照组(p=0.002),操作速度也较快(p=0.077)。
结论 通过降低标本损伤的风险和提高操作速度,去除吻合钉可能改善残胃或胃管中胃癌 ESD 的结果,且无并发症发生。