Zapiola 1646. Piso 2, CABA (1426) Buenos Aires, Argentina. E-mail:
Psychoanal Rev. 2022 Sep;109(3):257-275. doi: 10.1521/prev.2022.109.3.257.
The author focuses on trans-identities within the broader field of trans-subjectivities while arguing that subjectivity should be considered within the conceptual framework of a heterogeneous and plural subject. The analyst's eagerness to classify gender and sex or typify pathology in a Manichean manner is an inevitable consequence of binary thought. This provokes undesired countertransference effects and creates obstacles to listening in the analytic session. The following contribution reexamines several notions to offer a renewed perspective on the concept of the subject, the Oedipus complex, the desire for a child, the categories of difference and diversity, and the blind spots of binary logic, among others. This reconsideration may in turn elucidate our comprehension of gender and sexual diversities. In this context, the author stresses the need to approach trans-identities and trans-subjectivities with a nonbinary logic based on a rhizomatous way of thinking.
作者专注于跨认同(trans-identities)在更广泛的跨主体(subjectivities)领域内的研究，同时认为主体(subjectivity)应该在一个异质和多元主体的概念框架内被考虑。分析师急于对性别和性进行分类，或者以善恶二元论的方式对病理学进行典型化，这是二元思维的必然结果。这会引发不期望的反移情效应，并在分析会议上造成倾听的障碍。以下的论述重新审视了几个概念，为主体、俄狄浦斯情结、对孩子的渴望、差异和多样性的范畴，以及二元逻辑的盲点等概念提供了新的视角。这种重新思考反过来可能会阐明我们对性别和性多样性的理解。在这种情况下，作者强调需要用一种基于根茎思维的非二元逻辑来处理跨认同和跨主体。
