The Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI, 53792, USA.
Eur Radiol. 2023 Feb;33(2):1050-1062. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-09112-8. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
To compare the acute and chronic safety and treatment effects of non-invasive hepatic histotripsy vs. percutaneous microwave (MW) ablation in a healthy porcine model.
This was a dual-arm study in which each animal (n = 14) received either a single hepatic microwave (n = 6) or histotripsy (n = 6 single treatment; n = 2 double treatment) under ultrasound guidance. The goal was to create 2.5-3.0 cm short-axis treatments in similar locations across modalities. Animals were survived for 1 month with contrast-enhanced CT imaging on days 0, 2, 7, 14, and 28. On day 28, necropsy and histopathology were performed.
All procedures were well-tolerated. MW ablation zones were longer and more oblong, but equivalent in the short axes to histotripsy zones on immediate post-procedure CT (p < 0.001 and p = 0.45, respectively). Overall, MW volumes were larger (21.4 cm vs. 13.4 cm; p = 0.001) and histotripsy treatment zones were more spherical (p = 0.007). Histotripsy zones were close to the prescribed size (p < 0.001). Over the study period, histotripsy treatment zones decreased in volume while microwave ablation zones slightly increased (-83% vs. +17%, p = 0.001). There were several imaging-only findings: Branch portal vein thrombus with both histotripsy (7/8) and MW (6/6), hematoma in 2/6 MW only, and a gallbladder injury in 1/6 MW animals. The ablation zones demonstrated complete cellular destruction for both modalities.
Histotripsy was associated with more spherical treatments, fewer biliary complications, and greater treatment zone involution. Hepatic MW and histotripsy treatment in a normal porcine model appear at least equally effective for creating treatment zones with a similar safety profile.
• Microwave ablation and histotripsy for liver treatment in a healthy porcine model yield equivalent procedural tolerance and cellular destruction. • Histotripsy was associated with more spherical treatments, fewer biliary complications, and greater treatment zone involution over the 28-day follow-up period. • These findings confirm the safety and efficacy of hepatic histotripsy and support the pursuit of clinical trials to further evaluate the translatability of these results.
比较非侵入性肝组织破坏与经皮微波(MW)消融在健康猪模型中的急性和慢性安全性及治疗效果。
这是一项双臂研究,每只动物(n=14)接受单次肝 MW(n=6)或单次组织破坏(n=6;n=2 次双治疗)治疗,均在超声引导下进行。目标是在两种模式下在相似部位创建 2.5-3.0cm 的短轴治疗。动物在第 0、2、7、14 和 28 天接受增强 CT 成像检查,然后存活 1 个月。在第 28 天进行尸检和组织病理学检查。
所有程序均耐受良好。MW 消融区更长且更椭圆,但在即刻 CT 上与组织破坏区的短轴长度相当(分别为 p<0.001 和 p=0.45)。总体而言,MW 体积较大(21.4cm 比 13.4cm;p=0.001),组织破坏治疗区更接近球形(p=0.007)。组织破坏区接近规定大小(p<0.001)。在研究期间,组织破坏治疗区体积减小,而微波消融区体积略有增加(-83%比+17%,p=0.001)。有几个仅影像学发现:组织破坏(7/8)和 MW(6/6)均有分支门静脉血栓形成,MW 仅 2/6 有血肿,MW 动物有 1/6 胆囊损伤。两种方式的消融区均表现出完全的细胞破坏。
组织破坏治疗与更接近球形治疗区、更少的胆道并发症和更大的治疗区退缩相关。在正常猪模型中,肝 MW 和组织破坏治疗在创建具有相似安全性特征的治疗区方面似乎同样有效。
微波消融和组织破坏治疗肝在健康猪模型中产生等效的手术耐受性和细胞破坏。
组织破坏治疗与更接近球形治疗区、更少的胆道并发症和 28 天随访期间更大的治疗区退缩相关。
这些发现证实了肝组织破坏的安全性和有效性,并支持进行临床试验以进一步评估这些结果的转化性。