Division of Cardiology, University of Florida College of Medicine-Jacksonville, 655 West 8th Street, Jacksonville, FL, 32209, USA.
Maria Cecilia Hospital, GVM Care & Research, Cotignola, Italy.
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2022 Oct;54(3):461-469. doi: 10.1007/s11239-022-02696-4. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
Switching P2Y inhibitors is common in clinical practice. However, data on the pharmacodynamic (PD) effects of switching in clinical settings characterized by high platelet reactivity, such as diabetes mellitus (DM), are limited. This is a post-hoc analysis from a prospective, randomized, open-label study conducted in coronary artery disease patients comparing the PD effects of loading dose (LD) and maintenance dose regimens of prasugrel vs ticagrelor according to DM status. A total of 110 patients were enrolled: 42 (38%) with DM and 68 (62%) without DM. All patients were on maintenance dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel. PD assessments were performed using whole blood vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP), with results quantified by the platelet reactivity index (PRI), VerifyNow P2Y12 (VN-P2Y12) with results reported as P2Y12 reaction units (PRU), and light transmittance aggregometry (LTA) following 20 and 5 µM adenosine diphosphate stimuli with results reported as maximum platelet aggregation (MPA). PD assessments were performed at baseline (while on clopidogrel), 30 min after LD, 2 h after LD, and 1 week after LD. Overall, platelet reactivity was higher in DM than in non-DM patients while on clopidogrel therapy. After switching to either prasugrel or ticagrelor, platelet reactivity dropped but remained significantly higher among patients with DM at 30 min with all tests (VN-PRU p < 0.01, MPA 20 µM p < 0.01, VASP-PRI p = 0.02) and at 2 h with VN-PRU (p < 0.01) and LTA-MPA 20 µM (p < 0.01) but not with VASP-PRI (p = 0.19). There were no significant differences between prasugrel and ticagrelor both among patients with or without DM, except for lower LTA-MPA 20 at 30 min (p < 0.01) among non-DM patients treated with prasugrel. Patients with DM treated with clopidogrel have higher platelet reactivity compared to patients without DM. Although platelet reactivity markedly reduces to a similar extent after switching to prasugrel or ticagrelor, patients with DM persist with increased platelet reactivity compared to patients without DM.Study registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01852175.
在临床实践中,转换 P2Y 抑制剂很常见。然而,在高血小板反应性(如糖尿病)为特征的临床环境中,关于转换的药效学(PD)影响的数据是有限的。这是一项来自前瞻性、随机、开放标签研究的事后分析,该研究比较了根据糖尿病状态,普拉格雷与替格瑞洛的负荷剂量(LD)和维持剂量方案的 PD 影响,该研究纳入了 110 例冠心病患者。其中 42 例(38%)患有糖尿病,68 例(62%)没有糖尿病。所有患者均接受阿司匹林和氯吡格雷双联抗血小板治疗。使用全血血管扩张刺激磷蛋白(VASP)进行 PD 评估,结果用血小板反应指数(PRI)定量,用VerifyNow P2Y12(VN-P2Y12)以 P2Y12 反应单位(PRU)报告结果,在 20 和 5µM 二磷酸腺苷刺激后用透光比浊法(LTA)报告结果,以最大血小板聚集(MPA)表示。PD 评估在基线(氯吡格雷治疗时)、LD 后 30 分钟、LD 后 2 小时和 LD 后 1 周进行。总体而言,在接受氯吡格雷治疗时,糖尿病患者的血小板反应性高于非糖尿病患者。转换为普拉格雷或替格瑞洛后,血小板反应性下降,但在所有检测中,糖尿病患者在 30 分钟时(VN-PRU p<0.01,MPA 20µM p<0.01,VASP-PRI p=0.02)和 2 小时时(VN-PRU p<0.01)和 LTA-MPA 20µM(p<0.01)仍显著升高,但 VASP-PRI 无差异(p=0.19)。在有或没有糖尿病的患者中,普拉格雷和替格瑞洛之间没有显著差异,除了在接受普拉格雷治疗的非糖尿病患者中,LTA-MPA 20 在 30 分钟时较低(p<0.01)。与非糖尿病患者相比,接受氯吡格雷治疗的糖尿病患者的血小板反应性更高。尽管转换为普拉格雷或替格瑞洛后血小板反应性明显降低到相似程度,但糖尿病患者的血小板反应性仍高于非糖尿病患者。研究注册:ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT01852175。