Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510006, China; Department of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Guizhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guiyang 550001, China.
Department of Critical Care Medicine and Hospital Infection Prevention and Control, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital & First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Health Science Center, Shenzhen 518035, China; Department of Critical Care Medicine, General Hospital of Southern Theatre Command of Peoples Liberation Army, Guangzhou 510010, China.
Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Nov;61:56-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.08.042. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
Despite a growing understanding of exertional heatstroke (EHS), there is a paucity of clinical evidence for risk-stratification of patients with EHS. The objective of this study was to identify an appropriate scoring system for prognostic assessment of EHS.
This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients with EHS admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) of the General Hospital of Southern Theatre Command of PLA between October 2008 and May 2019. Inflammatory indices and organ function parameters at admission, the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) scores, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores, and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score were collected. Risk factors for 90-day mortality were identified using multivariate Cox proportional hazard risk regression model.
189 patients (all male) were finally included, with a median age of 21.0 years (IQR 19.0-27.0), median APACHE II score of 11.0 (IQR 8.0-16.0), median SOFA score of 3.0 (IQR 2.0-6.0), and median GCS score of 12.0 (IQR 7.0-14.0). There were 166 survivors (87.8%) and 23 non-survivors (12.2%). Compared with survivor group, non-survivors had higher incidence of severe organ damage, including rhabdomyolysis (46.1% vs 63.6%), disseminated intravascular coagulation (25.6% vs 90.0%), acute liver injury (69.4% vs 95.7%), and acute kidney injury (36.6% vs 95.7%). Multivariate Cox risk regression model showed that SOFA score was an independent risk factor for 90-day mortality, with an optimal cutoff score of 7.5.
SOFA score may be a clinically useful predictor of death in EHS. Prospective studies are required to confirm the effectiveness of SOFA score and the optimal cutoff level.
尽管人们对运动性中暑(EHS)的认识不断加深,但对于 EHS 患者的风险分层,临床证据仍然匮乏。本研究的目的是确定一种合适的评分系统,用于评估 EHS 的预后。
这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入 2008 年 10 月至 2019 年 5 月期间在解放军南部战区总医院重症监护病房(ICU)收治的所有 EHS 患者。收集入院时的炎症指标和器官功能参数、急性生理学和慢性健康评估 II (APACHE II)评分、序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分和格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)。使用多变量 Cox 比例风险回归模型确定 90 天死亡率的危险因素。
最终纳入 189 例患者(均为男性),中位年龄为 21.0 岁(IQR 19.0-27.0),中位 APACHE II 评分为 11.0(IQR 8.0-16.0),中位 SOFA 评分为 3.0(IQR 2.0-6.0),中位 GCS 评分为 12.0(IQR 7.0-14.0)。166 例患者存活(87.8%),23 例患者死亡(12.2%)。与存活组相比,死亡组患者严重器官损伤的发生率更高,包括横纹肌溶解症(46.1% vs 63.6%)、弥散性血管内凝血(25.6% vs 90.0%)、急性肝损伤(69.4% vs 95.7%)和急性肾损伤(36.6% vs 95.7%)。多变量 Cox 风险回归模型显示,SOFA 评分是 90 天死亡率的独立危险因素,最佳截断值为 7.5。
SOFA 评分可能是 EHS 患者死亡的一个有用的临床预测指标。需要前瞻性研究来证实 SOFA 评分的有效性和最佳截断水平。