Schwartz R G, McKenzie W B, Alexander J, Sager P, D'Souza A, Manatunga A, Schwartz P E, Berger H J, Setaro J, Surkin L
Am J Med. 1987 Jun;82(6):1109-18. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(87)90212-9.
To impact on the development of clinical congestive heart failure as a complication of doxorubicin therapy, left ventricular ejection fraction was monitored with serial resting radionuclide angiocardiography in 1,487 patients with cancer over a seven-year period in both university and community hospital environments. A high-risk subset of 282 patients was selected for retrospective analysis of their clinical outcome. High-risk patients were identified by one or two of the following three criteria: decline of 10 percent or more in absolute left ventricular ejection fraction from a normal baseline to 50 percent or less; high cumulative dose of doxorubicin (more than 450 mg/m2); abnormal baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (less than 50 percent). Clinical congestive heart failure occurred in 46 (16 percent) during the treatment period, and in an additional three patients (1.3 percent) at last follow-up examination 11.8 +/- 14.2 months following discontinuation of doxorubicin. Total cumulative dosages of doxorubicin that precipitated congestive heart failure (75 to 1,095 mg/m2) and those that did not (30 to 880 mg/m2) varied widely. Decline of 10 percent or more in absolute left ventricular ejection fraction to a value of 50 percent or less preceded administration of the final dose of doxorubicin that precipitated clinical congestive heart failure in the majority of patients in whom congestive heart failure developed. Clinical congestive heart failure improved in 87 percent given routine therapy with digitalis, diuretics, and/or vasodilators. Criteria for monitoring left ventricular ejection fraction and discontinuing doxorubicin were formulated. The occurrence of clinical congestive heart failure was compared in those patients whose management was concordant with proposed criteria (Group A) and in those whose management was not (Group B). Group A had a lower incidence of congestive heart failure compared with Group B (2.9 percent versus 20.8 percent, p less than 0.001) and had only mild congestive heart failure that resolved with treatment (n = 2) and no deaths due to congestive heart failure. Multivariate analysis with proportional-hazards regression (Cox's model) demonstrated a fourfold reduction in the incidence of congestive heart failure independent of other clinical predictor variables in those patients whose management was concordant with proposed guideline criteria. The incidence, persistence, late development, predictability, and reversibility of clinical congestive heart failure were comparable in university and community hospital settings.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
为了研究作为阿霉素治疗并发症的临床充血性心力衰竭的发展情况,在大学和社区医院环境中,对1487例癌症患者进行了为期7年的系列静息放射性核素心血管造影监测左心室射血分数。选择282例高危患者进行临床结局的回顾性分析。高危患者通过以下三个标准中的一个或两个来确定:左心室射血分数从正常基线绝对下降10%或更多至50%或更低;阿霉素累积剂量高(超过450mg/m²);基线左心室射血分数异常(低于50%)。治疗期间46例(16%)发生临床充血性心力衰竭,在停用阿霉素后11.8±14.2个月的最后一次随访检查中,又有3例患者(1.3%)发生。引发充血性心力衰竭的阿霉素总累积剂量(75至1095mg/m²)和未引发的剂量(30至880mg/m²)差异很大。在大多数发生充血性心力衰竭的患者中,在给予引发临床充血性心力衰竭的最后一剂阿霉素之前,左心室射血分数绝对下降10%或更多至50%或更低。87%接受洋地黄、利尿剂和/或血管扩张剂常规治疗的患者临床充血性心力衰竭得到改善。制定了监测左心室射血分数和停用阿霉素的标准。比较了治疗符合提议标准的患者(A组)和不符合标准的患者(B组)临床充血性心力衰竭的发生情况。A组充血性心力衰竭的发生率低于B组(2.9%对20.8%,p<0.001),且仅有轻度充血性心力衰竭经治疗缓解(n=2),无因充血性心力衰竭死亡。比例风险回归(Cox模型)的多变量分析表明,在治疗符合提议指南标准的患者中,充血性心力衰竭的发生率独立于其他临床预测变量降低了四倍。在大学和社区医院环境中,临床充血性心力衰竭的发生率、持续性、晚期发生、可预测性和可逆性相当。(摘要截短至400字)