Sow Amina, Lemoine Maud, Toure Papa Souleymane, Diop Madoky, Lo Gora, De Veiga Jean, Pape Omar Thiaw, Seck Khady, Ndow Gibril, Bojang Lamin, Kane Arame, Oudiane Marina, Howell Jess, Nayagam Shevanthi, Moutchia Jude, Chemin Isabelle, Mendy Maimuna, Toure-Kane Coumba, Thursz Mark, Ka Mourtalla, Shimakawa Yusuke, Mboup Souleymane
Institut de Recherche en Santé de Surveillance Epidemiologique et de Formation (IRESSEF) Laboratoire CHNU Dalal Jamm Guediawaye, IRESSEF Diamnoadio Dakar, Senegal.
Laboratoire de Virology, Hopital Le Dantec, Dakar, Senegal.
JHEP Rep. 2022 Jul 9;4(10):100533. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2022.100533. eCollection 2022 Oct.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Strategies to implement HBV screening and treatment are critical to achieve HBV elimination but have been inadequately evaluated in sub-Saharan Africa (sSA).
We assessed the feasibility of screen-and-treat interventions in 3 real-world settings (community, workplace, and hospital) in Senegal. Adult participants were screened using a rapid HBsAg point-of-care test. The proportion linked to care, the proportion who had complete clinical staging (alanine transaminase [ALT], viral load, and FibroScan®), and the proportion eligible for treatment were compared among the 3 intervention groups.
In 2013-2016, a total of 3,665 individuals were screened for HBsAg in the community (n = 2,153) and in workplaces (n = 1,512); 199/2,153 (9.2%) and 167/1,512 (11%) were HBsAg-positive in the community and workplaces, respectively. In the hospital setting (outpatient clinics), 638 HBsAg-positive participants were enrolled in the study. All infected participants were treatment naïve. Linkage to care was similar among community-based (69.9%), workplace-based (69.5%), and hospital-based interventions (72.6%, = 0.617). Of HBV-infected participants successfully linked to care, full clinical staging was obtained in 47.5% (66/139), 59.5% (69/116), and 71.1% (329/463) from the community, workplaces, and hospitals, respectively ( <0.001). The proportion eligible for treatment (EASL criteria) differed among community- (9.1%), workplace- (30.4%), and hospital-based settings (17.6%, = 0.007). Acceptability of antiviral therapy, adherence, and safety at 1 year were very good.
HBV screen-and-treat interventions are feasible in non-hospital and hospital settings in Senegal. However, the continuum of care is suboptimal owing to limited access to full clinical staging. Improvement in access to diagnostic services is urgently needed in sSA.
Hepatitis B infection is highly endemic in Senegal. Screening for infection can be done outside hospitals, in communities or workplaces. However, the hepatitis B continuum of care is suboptimal in Senegal and needs to be simplified to scale-up diagnosis and treatment coverage.
实施乙肝病毒筛查和治疗的策略对于实现消除乙肝病毒至关重要,但在撒哈拉以南非洲地区(sSA)尚未得到充分评估。
我们评估了在塞内加尔3个现实环境(社区、工作场所和医院)中进行筛查和治疗干预措施的可行性。成年参与者使用快速乙肝表面抗原即时检测进行筛查。比较了3个干预组中与护理机构建立联系的比例、进行完整临床分期(丙氨酸转氨酶[ALT]、病毒载量和FibroScan®)的比例以及符合治疗条件的比例。
2013 - 2016年,共有3665人在社区(n = 2153)和工作场所(n = 1512)接受了乙肝表面抗原筛查;社区和工作场所中分别有199/2153(9.2%)和167/1512(11%)的人乙肝表面抗原呈阳性。在医院环境(门诊诊所)中,638名乙肝表面抗原阳性参与者被纳入研究。所有感染参与者均未接受过治疗。基于社区(69.9%)、工作场所(69.5%)和医院(72.6%,P = 0.617)的干预措施中与护理机构建立联系的情况相似。在成功与护理机构建立联系的乙肝病毒感染参与者中,社区、工作场所和医院分别有47.5%(66/139)、59.5%(69/116)和71.1%(329/463)的人获得了完整临床分期(P<0.001)。符合治疗条件(欧洲肝脏研究学会标准)的比例在社区(9.1%)、工作场所(30.4%)和医院环境(17.6%)之间存在差异(P = 0.007)。抗病毒治疗的可接受性、依从性和1年时的安全性都非常好。
乙肝病毒筛查和治疗干预措施在塞内加尔的非医院和医院环境中是可行的。然而,由于获得完整临床分期的机会有限,连续护理并不理想。撒哈拉以南非洲地区迫切需要改善获得诊断服务的机会。
乙肝感染在塞内加尔高度流行。感染筛查可以在医院外的社区或工作场所进行。然而,塞内加尔的乙肝连续护理并不理想,需要简化以扩大诊断和治疗覆盖范围。