• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

包涵体肌炎的不典型表现:临床特征和长期预后。

Atypical presentations of inclusion body myositis: Clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Department of Neurology, National Neuroscience Institute, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Muscle Nerve. 2022 Dec;66(6):686-693. doi: 10.1002/mus.27716. Epub 2022 Sep 18.

DOI:10.1002/mus.27716
PMID:36052422
Abstract

INTRODUCTIONS/AIMS: Inclusion body myositis (IBM) typically presents with progressive weakness preferentially involving finger flexors and quadriceps. Atypical presentations have been less commonly reported. Here, we aim to describe the clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes of IBM patients with atypical presentations.

METHODS

We retrospectively searched the Mayo Clinic medical records to identify IBM patients with atypical disease onset, seen between 2015 and 2020.

RESULTS

We identified 357 IBM patients, of whom 50 (14%) had an atypical presentation. Thirty-eight patients were diagnosed with IBM because they fulfilled one of the European Neuromuscular Center diagnostic categories at a later stage, 10 had all IBM histopathological features, and 2 were diagnosed on the basis of clinical and laboratory data. The most common presentation was dysphagia (50%), followed by asymptomatic hyperCKemia (24%; CK, creatine kinase), then foot drop (12%). 6% of patients presented with proximal arm weakness, 4% with axial weakness and 4% with facial diplegia. Median time from symptom onset to diagnosis was 9 y. Median age at diagnosis was 70.5 y. 16% of patients needed a walking aid. When tested, 86.5% of patients had impaired swallowing and 56% had elevated cytosolic nucleotidase-1A antibodies. Only 1/26 patients who received immunotherapy had minimal improvement. Upon follow-up, most patients had generalization of their weakness with a decline in their strength summated score of 0.082/mo.

DISCUSSION

A significant proportion of IBM patients may have an atypical presentation. Recognition of such heterogeneity could improve early diagnosis, prevent unnecessary immunotherapy, and provide insight for future diagnostic criteria development and clinical trials.

摘要

介绍/目的:包涵体肌炎(IBM)通常表现为进行性无力,主要累及手指屈肌和股四头肌。不典型表现较少见。在这里,我们旨在描述具有不典型表现的 IBM 患者的临床特征和长期预后。

方法

我们回顾性搜索了梅奥诊所的病历,以确定在 2015 年至 2020 年间出现不典型起病的 IBM 患者。

结果

我们确定了 357 例 IBM 患者,其中 50 例(14%)表现为不典型。38 例患者因后期符合欧洲神经肌肉中心的一个诊断类别而被诊断为 IBM,10 例具有 IBM 的所有组织病理学特征,2 例根据临床和实验室数据诊断。最常见的表现是吞咽困难(50%),其次是无症状性高肌酸激酶血症(24%;肌酸激酶,CK),然后是足下垂(12%)。6%的患者表现为手臂近端无力,4%的患者表现为轴性无力,4%的患者表现为面肌无力。从症状出现到诊断的中位时间为 9 年。诊断时的中位年龄为 70.5 岁。16%的患者需要助行器。当进行测试时,86.5%的患者存在吞咽困难,56%的患者存在胞浆核苷酸酶-1A 抗体升高。接受免疫治疗的 26 例患者中仅有 1 例有轻微改善。随访时,大多数患者的无力均有进展,其肌力总和评分每月下降 0.082。

讨论

相当一部分 IBM 患者可能存在不典型表现。认识到这种异质性可以改善早期诊断,避免不必要的免疫治疗,并为未来的诊断标准制定和临床试验提供见解。

相似文献

1
Atypical presentations of inclusion body myositis: Clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes.包涵体肌炎的不典型表现:临床特征和长期预后。
Muscle Nerve. 2022 Dec;66(6):686-693. doi: 10.1002/mus.27716. Epub 2022 Sep 18.
2
Phenotypic spectrum of inclusion body myositis.包涵体肌炎的表型谱。
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2024 Feb;42(2):445-453. doi: 10.55563/clinexprheumatol/fhrx3q. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
3
Two emerging phenotypes of atypical inclusion body myositis: illustrative cases.两种不典型包涵体肌炎的新兴表型:案例说明。
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2023 Mar;41(2):340-347. doi: 10.55563/clinexprheumatol/jq7zxd. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
4
Inclusion body myositis: correlation of clinical outcomes with histopathology, electromyography and laboratory findings.包涵体肌炎:临床结果与组织病理学、肌电图和实验室检查的相关性。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2022 May 30;61(6):2504-2511. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab754.
5
Inclusion-body myositis presenting with facial diplegia.包涵体肌炎致面瘫。
Muscle Nerve. 2014 Feb;49(2):287-9. doi: 10.1002/mus.24060. Epub 2013 Dec 18.
6
Clinical Subgroups and Factors Associated With Progression in Patients With Inclusion Body Myositis.包涵体肌炎患者进展相关的临床亚组和因素。
Neurology. 2023 Mar 28;100(13):e1406-e1417. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000206777. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
7
Inclusion body myositis with early onset: a population-based study.包涵体型肌炎的早发:一项基于人群的研究。
J Neurol. 2023 Nov;270(11):5483-5492. doi: 10.1007/s00415-023-11878-w. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
8
Impact of dysphagia and its severity on long-term survival and swallowing function outcomes in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies other than inclusion body myositis.特发性炎性肌病(不包括包涵体肌炎)患者吞咽困难及其严重程度对长期生存和吞咽功能结局的影响。
Int J Rheum Dis. 2022 Aug;25(8):897-909. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.14365. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
9
Dysphagia as the Presenting Symptom for Inclusion Body Myositis.以吞咽困难为首发症状的包涵体肌炎。
J Investig Med High Impact Case Rep. 2021 Jan-Dec;9:23247096211050211. doi: 10.1177/23247096211050211.
10
Dysphagia in inflammatory myopathy: clinical characteristics, treatment strategies, and outcome in 62 patients.炎性肌病中的吞咽困难:62例患者的临床特征、治疗策略及预后
Mayo Clin Proc. 2007 Apr;82(4):441-7. doi: 10.4065/82.4.441.

引用本文的文献

1
Differentiating Inclusion Body Myositis From Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Based on the Features of Dysphagia: Insights From a Patient With Rapidly Progressive Dysphagia.基于吞咽困难特征鉴别包涵体肌炎与肌萎缩侧索硬化:来自一名快速进展性吞咽困难患者的见解
J Clin Neurol. 2025 Jan;21(1):83-85. doi: 10.3988/jcn.2024.0134.
2
NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation and Altered Mitophagy Are Key Pathways in Inclusion Body Myositis.NLRP3炎性小体激活和线粒体自噬改变是包涵体肌炎的关键途径。
J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2025 Feb;16(1):e13672. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.13672.
3
Inclusion body myositis and immunosenescence: current evidence and future perspectives.
包涵体肌炎与免疫衰老:当前证据与未来展望
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2025 Mar 1;64(3):952-961. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keae614.
4
NLRP3 inflammasome activation and altered mitophagy are key pathways in inclusion body myositis.NLRP3炎性小体激活和线粒体自噬改变是包涵体肌炎的关键途径。
medRxiv. 2024 Jun 16:2024.06.15.24308845. doi: 10.1101/2024.06.15.24308845.
5
Electromyography varies by stage in inclusion body myositis.肌电图在包涵体肌炎的不同阶段有所不同。
Front Neurol. 2024 Jan 5;14:1295396. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1295396. eCollection 2023.
6
Cost of illness in inclusion body myositis: results from a cross-sectional study in Germany.包涵体肌炎疾病负担:来自德国横断面研究的结果。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2023 Oct 25;18(1):337. doi: 10.1186/s13023-023-02902-3.
7
Exploring challenges in the management and treatment of inclusion body myositis.探讨包涵体肌炎的管理和治疗中的挑战。
Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2023 Nov 1;35(6):404-413. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000958. Epub 2023 Jul 25.
8
Inclusion body myositis with early onset: a population-based study.包涵体型肌炎的早发:一项基于人群的研究。
J Neurol. 2023 Nov;270(11):5483-5492. doi: 10.1007/s00415-023-11878-w. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
9
Inaugural dropped head syndrome and camptocormia in inflammatory myopathies: a retrospective study.炎性肌病中首发的跌倒发作和屈颈畸形:一项回顾性研究。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2024 Feb 1;63(2):506-515. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead347.
10
Inclusion body myositis: from genetics to clinical trials.包涵体肌炎:从遗传学研究到临床试验。
J Neurol. 2023 Mar;270(3):1787-1797. doi: 10.1007/s00415-022-11459-3. Epub 2022 Nov 18.