Federal University of Technology Owerri, Owerri, Imo, Nigeria.
Environ Monit Assess. 2022 Sep 2;194(10):719. doi: 10.1007/s10661-022-10341-z.
Aquifer hydraulic parameters including hydraulic conductivity and transmissivity play a very important role in the assessment and management of groundwater. Conventionally, these parameters are best estimated employing pump test, which is usually expensive and time-consuming. The use of surficial electrical resistivity data integrated with few available pumping test data provides a cost-effective and efficient alternative. A total of thirty-five (35) vertical electrical soundings with a maximum half-current electrode spacing of 150 m using the Schlumberger array were used in this study. Five (5) of these soundings were parametric soundings carried out in the vicinity of monitoring wells for correlation and comparative purposes. The empirical relationships between the hydraulic parameters derived from the pump test data and the aquifer resistivity data were established for the Ebonyi and Abakaliki Formations, respectively, and, in turn, used to estimate aquifer hydraulic parameters in areas away from wells. Aquifer hydraulic conductivity estimated across the study area varies from 0.49 to 1.5735 m/day with a mean value of 0.9205 m/day for the Ebonyi Formation, while the Abakaliki Formation has hydraulic conductivity values that vary from 0.0775 to 1.3023 m/day, with a mean value of 0.2883 m/day. The transmissivity values estimated across the study area range between 0.29 and 57.27 m/day with a mean value of 6.59 m/day. Transmissivity values obtained were interpreted with Krásný's transmissivity classification, and this delineated the study area into three groundwater potential zones: very low, low, and intermediate zones. The study shows that the areas underlain by the Ebonyi Formation have a higher groundwater potential than those underlain by the Abakaliki Formation. These findings are supported by the geology of the area, which revealed that the Abakaliki Formation is dominated by shales with very low permeability, while the Ebonyi Formation consists of shales with alternations of sand/sandstones, which statistical analysis of the different model equations used in estimating the hydraulic parameters of the study area revealed that the new model empirical equations proposed and used in the present study proved to be the best alternatives to pumping test data.
含水层水力参数,包括水力传导率和导水率,在地下水的评估和管理中起着非常重要的作用。传统上,这些参数最好通过抽水试验来估计,而抽水试验通常既昂贵又耗时。利用表面电阻率数据并结合少量可用的抽水试验数据,提供了一种具有成本效益和高效率的替代方法。本研究共使用了 35 个最大半电流电极间距为 150 米的垂直电测深,采用施伦贝尔格排列。其中 5 个电测深是在监测井附近进行的参数电测深,用于相关和比较目的。分别为埃博尼和阿巴卡利基组建立了从抽水试验数据和含水层电阻率数据推导出的水力参数之间的经验关系,并依次用于估计远离井的区域的含水层水力参数。研究区的含水层渗透系数估计值范围为 0.49 至 1.5735 米/天,埃博尼组的平均值为 0.9205 米/天,而阿巴卡利基组的渗透系数值范围为 0.0775 至 1.3023 米/天,平均值为 0.2883 米/天。研究区的导水率估计值范围在 0.29 至 57.27 米/天之间,平均值为 6.59 米/天。根据 Krásný 的导水率分类对获得的导水率值进行了解释,将研究区划分为三个地下水潜力区:极低、低和中等区。研究表明,埃博尼组覆盖的区域比阿巴卡利基组覆盖的区域具有更高的地下水潜力。这一发现得到了该地区地质情况的支持,该地区的地质情况表明,阿巴卡利基组主要由渗透率非常低的页岩组成,而埃博尼组则由页岩与砂岩/砂岩交替组成。对用于估计研究区水力参数的不同模型方程的统计分析表明,本研究提出并使用的新模型经验方程是对抽水试验数据的最佳替代方案。