• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Fear, freedom and political culture during COVID-19.新冠疫情期间的恐惧、自由和政治文化。
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2022 Jun;40(1):110-119. doi: 10.1007/s40592-022-00157-5. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
2
COVID-19 Down Under: Australia's Initial Pandemic Experience.澳大拉西亚的 COVID-19 疫情:澳大利亚的初步疫情应对经验
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 1;17(23):8939. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17238939.
3
Undoing elimination: Modelling Australia's way out of the COVID-19 pandemic.消除消除策略:为澳大利亚走出 COVID-19 大流行建模。
Glob Public Health. 2023 Jan;18(1):2195899. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2023.2195899.
4
A Panacea for Australia's COVID-19 Crisis? Weighing Some Legal Implications of Mandatory Vaccination.为澳大利亚的 COVID-19 危机提供灵丹妙药?权衡强制接种疫苗的一些法律影响。
J Law Med. 2021 Dec;28(4):993-1017.
5
The Australian health system response to COVID-19 from a resilient health care perspective: what have we learned?从具有韧性的医疗保健角度看澳大利亚卫生系统对新冠疫情的应对:我们学到了什么?
Public Health Res Pract. 2020 Dec 9;30(4):3042025. doi: 10.17061/phrp3042025.
6
The value conflict between freedom and security: Explaining the variation of COVID-19 policies in democracies and autocracies.自由与安全之间的价值冲突:解释民主国家和专制国家 COVID-19 政策的变化。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 9;17(9):e0274270. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274270. eCollection 2022.
7
COVID-19 and Australian Prisons: Human Rights, Risks, and Responses.COVID-19 与澳大利亚监狱:人权、风险与应对。
J Bioeth Inq. 2020 Dec;17(4):663-667. doi: 10.1007/s11673-020-10054-3. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
8
COVID-19: How do emergency departments fare after normalisation steps?新冠疫情:在正常化步骤之后,急诊科情况如何?
Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Feb;75(2):e13912. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13912. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
9
Editorial: Reflecting on Australia's health services response to the COVID-19 pandemic: what can be learned?社论:反思澳大利亚卫生服务部门对新冠疫情的应对措施:能学到什么?
Front Public Health. 2023 May 2;11:1199147. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1199147. eCollection 2023.
10
Multisystemic resilience to shocks: a temporal analysis of health, fundamental rights and freedoms, and economic resilience during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in 22 European countries.多系统对冲击的弹性:对 22 个欧洲国家 COVID-19 大流行第一波期间健康、基本权利和自由以及经济弹性的时间分析。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 7;13(7):e065445. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065445.

引用本文的文献

1
Children First, a Debate on the Restrictions to Tackle COVID-19.儿童优先:关于应对新冠疫情限制措施的一场辩论
Children (Basel). 2023 Jan 25;10(2):211. doi: 10.3390/children10020211.

新冠疫情期间的恐惧、自由和政治文化。

Fear, freedom and political culture during COVID-19.

机构信息

The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

University College London, London, England.

出版信息

Monash Bioeth Rev. 2022 Jun;40(1):110-119. doi: 10.1007/s40592-022-00157-5. Epub 2022 Jun 15.

DOI:10.1007/s40592-022-00157-5
PMID:36053481
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9438370/
Abstract

Australia's experience of the COVID-19 pandemic has been widely perceived to have been a successful one, based on the relatively few number of lives lost to the virus compared to the rest of the world. There remain, nonetheless, serious ethical challenges at the heart of the Australian response to COVID-19. The broadly positive outcomes of Australia's pandemic response mask more troubling developments within its political culture, and the costs it has imposed on its society. This article examines two concerns in particular: the normalisation of fear and emergency through the language and policy responses adopted by governments, and the significant diminution of individual freedoms and human rights.

摘要

澳大利亚在应对 COVID-19 疫情方面的经验被广泛认为是成功的,与世界其他地区相比,澳大利亚因该病毒而失去生命的人数相对较少。然而,澳大利亚对 COVID-19 的应对措施仍存在核心伦理挑战。澳大利亚大流行应对措施的广泛积极成果掩盖了其政治文化内部更令人不安的发展,以及它给社会带来的代价。本文特别探讨了两个问题:政府通过语言和政策反应使恐惧和紧急情况常态化,以及个人自由和人权的显著减少。