• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

纽约州危机妊娠中心实践的神秘客户研究。

A mystery client study of crisis pregnancy center practices in New York State.

机构信息

Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, United States.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY, United States.

出版信息

Contraception. 2023 Jan;117:36-38. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2022.08.004. Epub 2022 Aug 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.contraception.2022.08.004
PMID:36055360
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate practices of crisis pregnancy centers (CPCs) in a state with supportive abortion policies.

STUDY DESIGN

We called all New York State CPCs regarding their services using a "mystery client" protocol, utilizing checklists and thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Of 86 CPCs, 67 (78%) encouraged in-person appointments, offering free medical services and support. Twelve centers (14%) spontaneously disclosed their non-medical status, and 36 (42%) disclosed after direct questioning. Sixty-five (76%) made inaccurate or inflammatory statements about pregnancy or abortion.

CONCLUSIONS

In a state without specific barriers to abortion and pregnancy care, CPCs claim to provide support while using inflammatory rhetoric and concealing their organizational status.

摘要

目的

评估在支持堕胎政策的州中危机怀孕中心(CPC)的实践情况。

研究设计

我们使用“神秘客户”协议,通过清单和主题分析,向所有纽约州的 CPC 致电询问其服务情况。

结果

在 86 家 CPC 中,有 67 家(78%)鼓励亲自预约,提供免费医疗服务和支持。有 12 家中心(14%)自动披露其非医疗地位,而有 36 家(42%)在直接询问后披露。有 65 家(76%)对怀孕或堕胎发表不准确或煽动性言论。

结论

在一个没有具体堕胎和怀孕护理障碍的州,CPC 声称提供支持,同时使用煽动性言论并隐瞒其组织地位。

相似文献

1
A mystery client study of crisis pregnancy center practices in New York State.纽约州危机妊娠中心实践的神秘客户研究。
Contraception. 2023 Jan;117:36-38. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2022.08.004. Epub 2022 Aug 31.
2
Early pregnancy confirmation availability at crisis pregnancy centers and abortion facilities in the United States.美国危机妊娠中心和堕胎机构提供早期妊娠确认服务的情况。
Contraception. 2023 Jan;117:30-35. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2022.08.008. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
3
The prevalence and impacts of crisis pregnancy center visits among a population of pregnant women.孕期女性中危机妊娠中心就诊的流行率及其影响。
Contraception. 2018 Jul;98(1):69-73. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.02.016. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
4
A Web-Based Geolocated Directory of Crisis Pregnancy Centers (CPCs) in the United States: Description of CPC Map Methods and Design Features and Analysis of Baseline Data.一个基于网络的美国危机怀孕中心(CPC)地理位置目录:CPC 地图方法和设计特点的描述以及基线数据的分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Mar 27;6(1):e16726. doi: 10.2196/16726.
5
Toll free but not judgment free: evaluating postabortion support services in Ontario.免费但并非无评判:评估安大略省堕胎后的支持服务
Contraception. 2015 Nov;92(5):469-74. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.08.003. Epub 2015 Aug 8.
6
Crisis management: pathways to crisis pregnancy centers.危机管理:通往危机妊娠中心的途径。
Women Health. 2024 Aug;64(7):604-613. doi: 10.1080/03630242.2024.2392140. Epub 2024 Aug 18.
7
Patient Experiences at California Crisis Pregnancy Centers: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Online Crowd-Sourced Reviews, 2010-2019.加州危机怀孕中心的患者体验:2010-2019 年在线众包评论的混合方法分析。
South Med J. 2022 Feb;115(2):144-151. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001353.
8
Crisis Pregnancy Centers in the United States: Lack of Adherence to Medical and Ethical Practice Standards; A Joint Position Statement of the Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine and the North American Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology.美国的危机怀孕中心:未遵守医学和道德实践标准;青少年健康与医学协会及北美儿科与青少年妇科协会的联合立场声明
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2019 Dec;32(6):563-566. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2019.10.008. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
9
Free, but at what cost? How US crisis pregnancy centres provide services.免费,但代价是什么?美国危机妊娠中心如何提供服务。
Cult Health Sex. 2023 Aug;25(8):1024-1038. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2022.2116489. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
10
Pregnancy outcomes after exposure to crisis pregnancy centers among an abortion-seeking sample recruited online.在线招募的寻求堕胎者样本中,危机妊娠中心暴露后的妊娠结局。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 28;16(7):e0255152. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255152. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence of crisis pregnancy center attendance among women in four U.S. states.美国四个州女性前往危机怀孕中心的比例
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 4;20(6):e0324228. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324228. eCollection 2025.
2
Characterizing Services Advertised on Crisis Pregnancy Center Websites.危机怀孕中心网站上所宣传服务的特征分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2025 Feb 1;185(2):238-240. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.6440.
3
Abortion patients' decision making about where to obtain out-of-state care following Texas' 2021 abortion ban.得克萨斯州 2021 年堕胎禁令后,堕胎患者关于在哪里获得州外护理的决策。
Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb;59(1):e14226. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14226. Epub 2023 Sep 12.