Gómez-Bueno Manuel, Pérez de la Sota Enrique, Forteza Gil Alberto, Ortiz-Berbel Daniel, Castrodeza Javier, García-Cosío Carmena María Dolores, Barge-Caballero Eduardo, Rangel Sousa Diego, Díaz Molina Beatriz, Manrique Antón Rebeca, Almenar-Bonet Luis, Uribarri González Aitor, Barrio-Rodríguez Alfredo, Castel Lavilla María Ángeles, López-López Laura, Dobarro Pérez David, Pastor Pérez Francisco, Burgos-Palacios Virginia, Álvarez-García Jesús, Garrido-Jiménez José Manuel, González-Fernández Óscar, Codina Pau, López-Granados Amador, Grau-Sepulveda Andrés, González-Costello José
Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Puerta de Hierro-Segovia Arana (IDIPHISA), Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CIBERCV), Spain.
Servicio de Cirugía Cardiaca, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2023 Apr;76(4):227-237. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2022.07.011. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
This report presents the clinical characteristics, outcomes and complications of all consecutive patients implanted with a long-term mechanical circulatory support device in Spain between 2007 and 2020.
Analysis of the Spanish Registry of durable ventricular assist devices (REGALAD) including data form Spanish centers with a mechanical circulatory support program.
During the study period, 263 ventricular assist devices were implanted in 22 hospitals. The implanted device was an isolated continuous-flow left ventricular assist device in 182 patients (69%), a pulsatile-flow device (58 isolated left ventricular and 21 biventricular) in 79 (30%), and a total artificial heart in 2 patients (1%). The strategy of the implant was as bridge to heart transplant in 78 patients (30%), bridge to candidacy in 110 (42%), bridge to recovery in 3 (1%) and destination therapy in 72 patients (27%). Overall survival at 6, 12 and 24 months was 79%, 74% and 69%, respectively, and was better in continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (84%, 80%, and 75%). The main adverse events related to this therapy were infections (37% of patients), bleeding (35%), neurological (29%), and device malfunction (17%).
Durable ventricular assist devices have emerged in Spain in the last few years as a useful therapy for patients with advanced heart failure. As in other international registries, the current trend is to use continuous-flow intracorporeal left ventricular devices, which are associated with better results. Adverse events continue to be frequent and severe.
本报告介绍了2007年至2020年期间在西班牙接受长期机械循环支持装置植入的所有连续患者的临床特征、结局和并发症。
对西班牙耐用心室辅助装置注册中心(REGALAD)进行分析,该中心的数据来自西班牙开展机械循环支持项目的中心。
在研究期间,22家医院共植入了263个心室辅助装置。植入的装置中,182例患者(69%)为单独的连续流左心室辅助装置,79例(30%)为搏动流装置(58例单独左心室和21例双心室),2例患者(1%)为全人工心脏。植入策略方面,78例患者(30%)为心脏移植过渡,110例(42%)为候选资格过渡,3例(1%)为恢复过渡,72例患者(27%)为目标治疗。6个月、12个月和24个月的总体生存率分别为79%、74%和69%,连续流左心室辅助装置的生存率更高(84%、80%和75%)。与该治疗相关的主要不良事件包括感染(37%的患者)、出血(35%)、神经功能障碍(29%)和装置故障(17%)。
在过去几年中,耐用心室辅助装置在西班牙已成为晚期心力衰竭患者的一种有效治疗方法。与其他国际注册中心一样,目前的趋势是使用连续流体内左心室装置,其效果更好。不良事件仍然频繁且严重。