Suppr超能文献

Le Fort I 骨切开术治疗 III 类牙颌面畸形的外科优先策略;是否有利?

Surgery-first approach for correction of class III dentofacial deformity with Le Fort I osteotomy; is it advantageous?

机构信息

Orthodontics, Glasgow University Dental Hospital and School, 378 Sauchiehall Street, Glasgow, UK.

Orthodontics, Glasgow University Dental Hospital and School, 378 Sauchiehall Street, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Nov;60(9):1234-1239. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2022.07.005. Epub 2022 Jul 22.

Abstract

The surgery-first approach (SFA) to orthognathic treatment aims to reduce its duration without compromising the outcome. However, the objective assessment of the achieved occlusion has been limited. This study was designed to assess the treatment duration, outpatient appointment number, and quality of occlusal outcomes for two groups of patients; one treated with the SFA and the other with an orthodontics-first approach (OFA). We carried our a retrospective cohort study of case records for twenty consecutive SFA, and 23 consecutive OFA, cases with class III malocclusions, treated with Le Fort I maxillary osteotomy only. Pre-and post-treatment study models were assessed using the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR). Significant differences (p<0.001) were found between the median active treatment durations (10.2 months for the SFA and 32.5 months for the OFA) and appointment numbers (14 for SFA and 24 for OFA). Median absolute PAR reductions were 40 for the SFA and 39 for the OFA. There was no significant difference between the groups regarding quality of occlusal correction. Treatment durations for the SFA group were significantly shorter than for the OFA group, with fewer outpatient appointments. The quality of occlusal outcome for both SFA and OFA groups were satisfactory and comparable.

摘要

手术优先(SFA)正颌治疗方法旨在缩短治疗时间而不影响治疗效果。然而,对获得的咬合的客观评估一直受到限制。本研究旨在评估两组患者的治疗持续时间、门诊预约次数和咬合结果的质量;一组采用 SFA,另一组采用正畸优先(OFA)方法。我们对 20 例连续 SFA 和 23 例连续 OFA 类错畸形患者的病例记录进行了回顾性队列研究,这些患者均仅接受了 Le Fort I 上颌骨截骨术。使用同伴评估等级(PAR)评估治疗前后的研究模型。SFA 的中位主动治疗持续时间(10.2 个月)和门诊预约次数(14 次)明显短于 OFA(32.5 个月和 24 次)(p<0.001)。SFA 的中位绝对 PAR 减少为 40,OFA 为 39。两组患者的咬合矫正质量无显著差异。SFA 组的治疗时间明显短于 OFA 组,门诊预约次数也更少。SFA 和 OFA 组的咬合结果质量均令人满意且相当。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验