Sakkab Ramez, MacRae Tyler M, Morgan Craig, Longobardi James
Podiatric Surgical Resident, Scripps Mercy Hospital, San Diego, CA.
Podiatric Surgical Resident, Scripps Mercy Hospital, San Diego, CA.
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2023 Mar-Apr;62(2):267-271. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2022.07.005. Epub 2022 Jul 29.
Complications remain despite conventional methods aimed at improving survivorship of lower extremity amputations. High rates of wound dehiscence, readmission, and revision surgery warrant the development of innovative methods to improve amputation survivorship. One such method employs the use of indocyanine green dye (ICG); an inert chemical injected intraoperatively which can be used to visualize dermal blood flow in real time. There is little objective data available to help guide the use of indocyanine green in limb salvage procedures. The present study compares a group of 31 patients undergoing minor lower extremity amputation with the use of indocyanine green with a control group of 62 patients in which traditional methods were used. Minimum follow-up of 9 months was obtained, leaving 93 patients in total for analysis. Success was defined as a healed amputation within 60 days of follow-up. Uneventful amputation healing occurred in 35.5% and 33.9% of indocyanine green and control patients, respectively. Overall, there was no significant difference in outcomes between groups (p = .965), or success versus failure (p = 1.0). Patient undergoing minor lower extremity amputation with the use of ICG fluorescence angiography did not have statistically inferior outcomes to patients who underwent amputations at the same level with traditional assessments of perfusion. Further research involving the use of this technique is warranted.
尽管有旨在提高下肢截肢患者生存率的传统方法,但并发症仍然存在。伤口裂开、再次入院和翻修手术的高发生率促使人们开发创新方法来提高截肢患者的生存率。一种这样的方法是使用吲哚菁绿染料(ICG);术中注射的一种惰性化学物质,可用于实时可视化真皮血流。目前几乎没有客观数据可用于指导吲哚菁绿在肢体挽救手术中的使用。本研究将31例使用吲哚菁绿进行下肢小截肢的患者与62例使用传统方法的对照组患者进行了比较。获得了至少9个月的随访,共有93例患者可供分析。成功定义为随访60天内截肢伤口愈合。吲哚菁绿组和对照组患者截肢伤口顺利愈合的比例分别为35.5%和33.9%。总体而言,两组之间的结果没有显著差异(p = 0.965),成功与失败之间也没有显著差异(p = 1.0)。使用ICG荧光血管造影进行下肢小截肢的患者与采用传统灌注评估方法在同一水平进行截肢的患者相比,在统计学上并没有较差的结果。有必要对该技术的应用进行进一步研究。