• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开启对话:一项评估基于夫妇的干预措施以减少年轻成年乳腺癌和妇科癌症幸存者夫妇生殖和性困扰的 III 期试验方案。

Opening the Conversation: study protocol for a Phase III trial to evaluate a couple-based intervention to reduce reproductive and sexual distress among young adult breast and gynecologic cancer survivor couples.

机构信息

College of Public Health & Human Sciences, School of Social & Behavioral Health Sciences, Oregon State University, 2250 SW Jefferson Way, Corvallis, OR, 97330, USA.

Connell School of Nursing, Boston College, 140 Commonwealth Ave, Chestnut Hill, MA, 02467, USA.

出版信息

Trials. 2022 Sep 2;23(1):730. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06665-3.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-022-06665-3
PMID:36056413
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9438271/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Reproductive and sexual health (RSH) concerns are common and distressing for young adults diagnosed with breast and gynecologic cancer and their partners. This study evaluates the efficacy of a virtual couple-based intervention called Opening the Conversation (OC). The OC intervention is grounded in theory and evidence-based practice and was adapted to improve coping and communication specifically in relation to RSH concerns after cancer.

METHODS

This Phase III trial is conducted in a fully remote setting and enrolls young adult couples (current age 18-44 years) with a history of breast or gynecologic cancer (stage 1-4, diagnosed under age 40) within the past 6 months to 5 years. Eligible dyads are recruited from across the USA. The target sample size is 100 couples. Dyads are randomly assigned to receive either the 5-session OC intervention or a 4-session active control intervention (Side by Side). The primary outcomes are change in reproductive distress and sexual distress. Secondary outcomes include communication about reproductive concerns, communication about sexual concerns, depressive symptoms, sexual function, relationship quality, relationship intimacy, sexual satisfaction, self-efficacy to communicate about sex and intimacy, and quality of life. An exploratory aim examines whether dyadic coping and communication quality mediate intervention effects on survivors' and partners' reproductive distress or sexual distress. Self-report outcome measures are assessed for both groups at baseline (T1), 2 weeks post-treatment (T2), and 3 months post-treatment (T3).

DISCUSSION

Despite the importance of RSH for quality of life for young adult cancer survivors and their partners, evidence-based interventions that help couples navigate RSH concerns are lacking. This randomized controlled trial will determine the efficacy of a novel couple-based intervention to reduce distress related to RSH concerns for younger couples after breast or gynecologic cancer, in comparison to an active control intervention.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04806724. Registered on Mar 19, 2021.

摘要

背景

生殖和性健康(RSH)问题在被诊断患有乳腺和妇科癌症的年轻患者及其伴侣中很常见,且令人困扰。本研究评估了一种名为“开启对话”(OC)的虚拟基于伴侣的干预措施的有效性。OC 干预措施基于理论和循证实践,并进行了调整,以专门改善与癌症后 RSH 相关的应对和沟通。

方法

这项 III 期试验是在完全远程环境中进行的,招募了过去 6 个月至 5 年内患有乳腺或妇科癌症(1-4 期,40 岁以下诊断)的年轻成年夫妇(当前年龄 18-44 岁)。符合条件的伴侣是从美国各地招募的。目标样本量为 100 对。伴侣被随机分配接受 5 节 OC 干预或 4 节积极对照干预(并肩)。主要结果是生殖困扰和性困扰的变化。次要结果包括生殖问题沟通、性问题沟通、抑郁症状、性功能、关系质量、关系亲密、性满意度、沟通性和亲密感的自我效能、生活质量。一个探索性目标是检查伴侣应对和沟通质量是否调节干预对幸存者和伴侣生殖困扰或性困扰的影响。两组在基线(T1)、治疗后 2 周(T2)和治疗后 3 个月(T3)时都要评估自我报告的结果。

讨论

尽管 RSH 对年轻癌症幸存者及其伴侣的生活质量很重要,但缺乏帮助伴侣应对 RSH 问题的循证干预措施。这项随机对照试验将确定一种新的基于伴侣的干预措施对减少年轻夫妇乳腺或妇科癌症后与 RSH 相关的困扰的疗效,与积极对照干预相比。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04806724。注册于 2021 年 3 月 19 日。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99e1/9438271/464e9c168087/13063_2022_6665_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99e1/9438271/f0c61d99101f/13063_2022_6665_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99e1/9438271/464e9c168087/13063_2022_6665_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99e1/9438271/f0c61d99101f/13063_2022_6665_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99e1/9438271/464e9c168087/13063_2022_6665_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Opening the Conversation: study protocol for a Phase III trial to evaluate a couple-based intervention to reduce reproductive and sexual distress among young adult breast and gynecologic cancer survivor couples.开启对话:一项评估基于夫妇的干预措施以减少年轻成年乳腺癌和妇科癌症幸存者夫妇生殖和性困扰的 III 期试验方案。
Trials. 2022 Sep 2;23(1):730. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06665-3.
2
Evaluating a couple-based intervention addressing sexual concerns for breast cancer survivors: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.评估一种针对乳腺癌幸存者性问题的夫妻为基础的干预措施:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Feb 12;21(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3975-2.
3
Adapting a Theory-Informed Intervention to Help Young Adult Couples Cope With Reproductive and Sexual Concerns After Cancer.采用基于理论的干预措施帮助年轻成年夫妻应对癌症后的生殖和性方面的担忧。
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 4;13:813548. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.813548. eCollection 2022.
4
TrueNTH sexual recovery study protocol: a multi-institutional collaborative approach to developing and testing a web-based intervention for couples coping with the side-effects of prostate cancer treatment in a randomized controlled trial.真实男性性康复研究方案:一种多机构合作的方法,旨在开发和测试一种基于网络的干预措施,以帮助应对前列腺癌治疗副作用的夫妇,这是一项随机对照试验。
BMC Cancer. 2017 Oct 2;17(1):664. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3652-3.
5
Sexual Health Outcomes of Adolescent and Young Adult Colorectal Cancer Survivors and Their Partners: Protocol of a Dyadic Mixed Methods Study.青少年及青年结直肠癌幸存者及其伴侣的性健康结局:一项二元混合方法研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Mar 23;12:e41831. doi: 10.2196/41831.
6
A randomized pilot trial of a telephone-based couples intervention for physical intimacy and sexual concerns in colorectal cancer.一项针对结直肠癌患者身体亲密关系和性方面问题的基于电话的夫妻干预随机试点试验。
Psychooncology. 2014 Sep;23(9):1005-13. doi: 10.1002/pon.3508. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
7
A randomized pilot trial of a couple-based intervention addressing sexual concerns for breast cancer survivors.一项针对乳腺癌幸存者性问题的基于夫妇的干预措施的随机试点试验。
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2019 Mar-Apr;37(2):242-263. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2018.1510869. Epub 2018 Dec 22.
8
A randomized comparison of group mindfulness and group cognitive behavioral therapy vs control for couples after prostate cancer with sexual dysfunction.一项针对前列腺癌后性功能障碍的夫妇的随机比较研究,比较了团体正念和团体认知行为疗法与对照组的效果。
J Sex Med. 2023 Feb 27;20(3):346-366. doi: 10.1093/jsxmed/qdac038.
9
Factorial Trial to Optimize an Internet-Delivered Intervention for Sexual Health After Breast Cancer: Protocol for the WF-2202 Sexual Health and Intimacy Enhancement (SHINE) Trial.多因素试验优化互联网干预乳腺癌后性健康的研究:WF-2202 性健康和亲密关系增强(SHINE)试验方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Aug 19;13:e57781. doi: 10.2196/57781.
10
Testing the efficacy of a couple-focused, tailored eHealth intervention for symptom self-management among men with prostate cancer and their partners: the study protocol.测试一种针对夫妻的、定制的电子健康干预措施对前列腺癌患者及其伴侣的症状自我管理的疗效:研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Jan 4;23(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05948-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Hematology and Oncology Fellow Education About Sexual and Reproductive Health: A Survey of Program Directors in the United States.血液学和肿瘤学研究员性与生殖健康教育培训:对美国项目主任的调查。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2024 Jun;20(6):852-860. doi: 10.1200/OP.23.00499. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
2
Clinical Practice Strategies to Address Sexual Health in Female Cancer Survivors.临床实践策略解决女性癌症幸存者的性健康问题。
J Clin Oncol. 2023 Nov 1;41(31):4927-4936. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.00523. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
3
Inequities Among Cancer Caregivers with Diverse Identities: A Review of the Literature and Future Directions.

本文引用的文献

1
Adapting a Theory-Informed Intervention to Help Young Adult Couples Cope With Reproductive and Sexual Concerns After Cancer.采用基于理论的干预措施帮助年轻成年夫妻应对癌症后的生殖和性方面的担忧。
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 4;13:813548. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.813548. eCollection 2022.
2
Talking but not always understanding: couple communication about infertility concerns after cancer.交谈却并非总能理解:癌症后夫妻关于不孕问题的沟通
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jan 19;21(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10188-y.
3
The impact of cancer-related fertility concerns on current and future couple relationships: People with cancer and partner perspectives.
癌症照顾者身份多样性的不公平现象:文献综述及未来方向。
Curr Oncol Rep. 2023 Jul;25(7):803-812. doi: 10.1007/s11912-023-01415-3. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
癌症相关生育问题对当前及未来伴侣关系的影响:癌症患者及其伴侣的观点。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2021 Jan;30(1):e13348. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13348. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
4
Cancer statistics for adolescents and young adults, 2020.青少年和青年癌症统计数据,2020 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Nov;70(6):443-459. doi: 10.3322/caac.21637. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
5
Rapid deployment of virtual mind-body interventions during the COVID-19 outbreak: feasibility, acceptability, and implications for future care.在 COVID-19 疫情期间快速部署虚拟身心干预措施:可行性、可接受性及其对未来护理的影响。
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Feb;29(2):543-546. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05740-2. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
6
Patient-Centered Communication to Address Young Adult Breast Cancer Survivors' Reproductive and Sexual Health Concerns.以患者为中心的沟通方式,解决年轻成年乳腺癌幸存者的生殖和性健康问题。
Health Commun. 2021 Nov;36(13):1743-1758. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2020.1794550. Epub 2020 Jul 23.
7
Access to Care: Using eHealth to Limit Location-Based Barriers for Patients With Cancer.就医机会:利用电子健康技术克服癌症患者的地理位置障碍。
Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2020 Jun 1;24(3):16-23. doi: 10.1188/20.CJON.S1.16-23.
8
Navigating sexual health in cancer survivorship: a dyadic perspective.癌症幸存者的性健康导航:二元视角
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Nov;28(11):5429-5439. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05396-y. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
9
Communication between Advanced Cancer Patients and Their Family Caregivers: Relationship with Caregiver Burden and Preparedness for Caregiving.晚期癌症患者及其家庭照顾者之间的沟通:与照顾者负担和照顾准备的关系。
Health Commun. 2021 May;36(6):714-721. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2020.1712039. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
10
A systematic review and meta-analysis of couple-based intervention on sexuality and the quality of life of cancer patients and their partners.基于伴侣的干预对癌症患者及其伴侣的性生活和生活质量的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Apr;28(4):1607-1630. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-05215-z. Epub 2019 Dec 24.