Cho Sung Hoon, Lim Kyoung Hoon
Trauma Center, Kyungpook National University Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea.
Trauma Center, Kyungpook National University Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea.
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2022 Sep;98:107572. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2022.107572. Epub 2022 Aug 31.
Venous pseudoaneurysm is uncommon in blunt trauma patients, and renal venous pseudoaneurysm is especially rare, even though renal trauma occurs in approximately 8-10 % of abdominal trauma cases. There is controversy regarding the modality of treatment between surgery, conservative care, and radiologic intervention to manage renal venous pseudoaneurysms. We would like to share our experience treating blunt trauma patients having renal venous pseudoaneurysm with conservative care.
A 53-year-old female patient was transferred to our trauma center following a pedestrian accident. Contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography (CT) showed right renal injury (grade II) with partial infarction (approximately 30-40 %) and peri-renal hematoma confined to Gerota's fascia without extravasation, a 3 cm sized right renal venous pseudoaneurysm, and a liver laceration (grade III) with a small amount of perihepatic hemoperitoneum. Since her vital signs were stable, with no decrease in the hemoglobin level in the short-term follow-up laboratory test, we decided to treat the patient conservatively in the trauma intensive care unit without angioembolization or surgery. The patient was discharged on the 14th day after OR/IF surgery for a right distal tibiofibular fracture. On a CT scan performed 1 month after discharge, a peri-renal hematoma was no longer observed, and the renal venous pseudoaneurysm had nearly improved.
Patients with renal arterial injury with unstable vital signs require surgery or angioembolization. Even if vital signs are stable, arterial pseudoaneurysms are more likely to rupture; therefore, surgery or angioembolization is required. In contrast, venous pseudoaneurysms can be managed conservatively compared to intervention or surgery in vitally stable patients because they have a lower possibility of rupture due to relatively low pressure.
Renal venous pseudoaneurysms are very rare. Surgery, conservative care, and radiologic intervention should be considered depending on the patient's condition. Because venous blood flow is slower than arterial blood flow, renal venous pseudoaneurysm can be treated with conservative care if there are no injuries requiring further management and if the patient's vital signs are stable.
静脉假性动脉瘤在钝性创伤患者中并不常见,肾静脉假性动脉瘤尤为罕见,尽管在约8%-10%的腹部创伤病例中会发生肾创伤。对于肾静脉假性动脉瘤的治疗方式,在手术、保守治疗和放射介入之间存在争议。我们想分享我们对钝性创伤所致肾静脉假性动脉瘤患者进行保守治疗的经验。
一名53岁女性患者在行人事故后被转至我们的创伤中心。腹部增强计算机断层扫描(CT)显示右肾损伤(Ⅱ级)伴部分梗死(约30%-40%),肾周血肿局限于肾周筋膜内且无外渗,一个3厘米大小的右肾静脉假性动脉瘤,以及肝裂伤(Ⅲ级)伴少量肝周腹腔积血。由于她的生命体征稳定,短期随访实验室检查中血红蛋白水平未下降,我们决定在创伤重症监护病房对患者进行保守治疗,不进行血管栓塞或手术。患者在接受右胫腓骨远端骨折切开复位/内固定手术后第14天出院。出院后1个月进行的CT扫描显示,肾周血肿不再存在,肾静脉假性动脉瘤几乎已好转。
生命体征不稳定的肾动脉损伤患者需要手术或血管栓塞治疗。即使生命体征稳定,动脉假性动脉瘤也更易破裂;因此,需要进行手术或血管栓塞治疗。相比之下,对于生命体征稳定的患者,静脉假性动脉瘤与介入治疗或手术相比可采用保守治疗,因为其压力相对较低,破裂可能性较小。
肾静脉假性动脉瘤非常罕见。应根据患者情况考虑手术、保守治疗和放射介入治疗。由于静脉血流比动脉血流慢,如果没有需要进一步处理的损伤且患者生命体征稳定,肾静脉假性动脉瘤可以采用保守治疗。