Suppr超能文献

后交叉韧带-股骨后皮质角:一种可靠、准确的 MRI 方法,用于定量测量 ACL 缺失膝关节中 PCL 的“交锁”现象。

The posterior cruciate ligament-posterior femoral cortex angle: a reliable and accurate MRI method to quantify the buckling phenomenon of the PCL in ACL-deficient knees.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Luxembourg-Clinique d'Eich, 78 Rue d'Eich, 1460, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Reims Teaching Hospital, Hôpital Maison Blanche, 45 Rue Cognacq-Jay, 51092, Reims, France.

出版信息

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Jan;31(1):332-339. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-07145-6. Epub 2022 Sep 3.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim was to validate a new MRI method to measure the buckling phenomenon of the PCL, representative of anterior tibial translation, by comparing its reliability and accuracy to identify anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient knees with existing methods.

METHODS

Patients were selected retrospectively and separated into a group of primary ACL injuries and ACL-intact knees. Exclusion criteria were: skeletal immaturity, PCL or a concomitant collateral ligament injury, signs of osteoarthritis (> 1 Kellgren and Lawrence score), tibial plateau fracture, previous ACL reconstruction or displaced meniscal bucket handle tear. The assessment of the curvature of the anterolateral bundle of the PCL was performed on T2 sagittal MRI slices according to 3 methods: (1) the PCL angle (PCLA), (2) the PCL inclination angle (PCLIA) and (3) a new method: the PCL-posterior cortex angle (PCL-PCA), representing the angle between the vertical part of the PCL-ALB and the posterior diaphyseal cortex of the femur. For each method, the inter- and intra-observer reliability was measured. The ability to discriminate both ACL-deficient and ACL-intact knees was evaluated using ROC curves.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients were included in each group. Intra-observer reliability was excellent for all 3 methods (ICCs > 0.90). Inter-observer reliability was excellent for the PCL-PCA (ICC > 0.90) and good for the PCLA and the PCLIA (ICCs between 0.75 and 0.90). The PCL-PCA had the highest precision (lowest standard error of measurement: 2.7°). It yielded an excellent discrimination between the ACL and CTL groups (AUC 0.80 [0.67-0.93]) with the highest sensitivity (71% [52.8-89.2]) and specificity (88% [75-100]) for a positive threshold when the angle was ≤ 22.7°. The PCLA and PCLIA methods led to acceptable discrimination and lower sensitivities and specificities (PCLA: AUC 0.71, sensitivity 63%, specificity 79%, threshold ≤ 117.9°; PCLIA: AUC 0.62, sensitivity 50%, specificity 83%, threshold ≤ 21.4°).

CONCLUSION

In comparison with previously described methods, the PCL-PCA was the most reliable and accurate method to measure the PCL buckling phenomenon on MRI in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient knees. It offers an easy and objective method for the follow-up of ACL-injured patients and can therefore be recommended for routine use.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

摘要

目的

通过比较新的 MRI 方法与现有方法在测量前交叉韧带(ACL)缺失膝关节前胫骨平移的后交叉韧带(PCL)卷曲现象的可靠性和准确性,验证一种新的 MRI 方法来测量 PCL 卷曲现象。

方法

回顾性选择患者,并分为原发性 ACL 损伤组和 ACL 正常组。排除标准为:骨骼未成熟、PCL 或其他伴发侧副韧带损伤、骨关节炎征象(>1 个 Kellgren 和 Lawrence 评分)、胫骨平台骨折、既往 ACL 重建或半月板桶柄状撕裂。根据 3 种方法(1)PCL 角(PCLA)、(2)PCL 倾斜角(PCLIA)和(3)新方法:PCL-后皮质角(PCL-PCA),评估前外侧束 PCL 的曲率,PCL-PCA 代表 PCL-ALB 的垂直部分与股骨骨干后皮质之间的角度。每种方法均测量了观察者内和观察者间的可靠性。使用 ROC 曲线评估区分 ACL 缺失和 ACL 正常膝关节的能力。

结果

每组纳入 24 例患者。所有 3 种方法的观察者内可靠性均为优(ICC>0.90)。PCL-PCA 的观察者间可靠性为优(ICC>0.90),PCLA 和 PCLIA 的观察者间可靠性为良(ICC 为 0.75-0.90)。PCL-PCA 的精度最高(测量标准误差最低:2.7°)。它在 ACL 和 CTL 组之间具有最佳的区分能力(AUC 为 0.80 [0.67-0.93]),阳性阈值时的最高灵敏度(71% [52.8-89.2])和特异性(88% [75-100])为(PCL-PCA 角≤22.7°)。PCLA 和 PCLIA 方法的区分能力可接受,灵敏度和特异性较低(PCLA:AUC 为 0.71,灵敏度 63%,特异性 79%,阈值≤117.9°;PCLIA:AUC 为 0.62,灵敏度 50%,特异性 83%,阈值≤21.4°)。

结论

与先前描述的方法相比,PCL-PCA 是在 ACL 缺失膝关节上测量 PCL 卷曲现象的最可靠和最准确的 MRI 方法。它为 ACL 损伤患者的随访提供了一种简单、客观的方法,因此可以推荐常规使用。

证据水平

IV。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验