Department of Medical Education, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Division of Hospital Medicine, Children's Hospital and Medical Center Omaha, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2022 Dec;57(12):2971-2980. doi: 10.1002/ppul.26118. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy is widely used for children with bronchiolitis, but its optimal role remains uncertain. Our institution created and later revised a clinical pathway guiding HFNC initiation and weaning.
A retrospective review of 1690 bronchiolitis encounters was conducted. Trends in the duration of HFNC and hours spent weaning HFNC as proportions of the monthly hospital length of stay (LOS) for bronchiolitis, hospital LOS, and escalation of care were compared using interrupted time series (ITS) models across three study periods: Baseline (HFNC managed at provider discretion), Intervention 1 (pathway with initiation at 0.5 L/kg/min and escalation up to 2 L/kg/min), and Intervention 2 (revised pathway, initiation at the maximum rate of 2 L/kg/min). Both pathway iterations provided titration and weaning guidance. Maximum respiratory scores were used to adjust for case severity.
After adjustment for severity and time, both HFNC duration and HFNC weaning time (as a proportion of monthly LOS) decreased at the start of Intervention 1, but subsequently increased. During Intervention 2, both these measures trended downward, returning to baseline. Total LOS did not change in the baseline or intervention periods. Escalation of care did not differ from baseline to the end of Intervention 2.
Initiating HFNC at higher flow rates with weaning guidance for children hospitalized with bronchiolitis was associated with a reduction in HFNC duration without differences in LOS or escalation of care. These findings suggest that standardization through clinical pathways can limit HFNC duration in bronchiolitis.
高流量鼻导管(HFNC)疗法广泛应用于毛细支气管炎患儿,但最佳应用方法仍不明确。本机构制定了 HFNC 启动和撤机的临床路径,并对其进行了修订。
对 1690 例毛细支气管炎患儿进行回顾性分析。采用中断时间序列(ITS)模型,比较了三个研究阶段(基线期:HFNC 由医生自行管理;干预 1 期:根据路径以 0.5 L/kg/min 的起始流速并逐渐增加至 2 L/kg/min 进行管理;干预 2 期:修订后的路径,以 2 L/kg/min 的最大流速起始)中 HFNC 持续时间和 HFNC 撤机时间(占毛细支气管炎月住院总时长的比例)的变化趋势,同时比较了住院总时长和治疗升级的变化趋势。两种路径方案均提供了滴定和撤机指导。采用最大呼吸评分调整病例严重程度。
校正严重程度和时间后,干预 1 期开始时 HFNC 持续时间和 HFNC 撤机时间(占月住院总时长的比例)均缩短,但随后增加。干预 2 期时,这两个指标均呈下降趋势,恢复至基线水平。基线期和干预期住院总时长均无变化。治疗升级与基线期相比无差异。
对于毛细支气管炎住院患儿,以较高流速启动 HFNC 并提供撤机指导,可缩短 HFNC 持续时间,同时不影响住院总时长或治疗升级。这些发现表明,通过临床路径实现标准化可以限制毛细支气管炎中 HFNC 的使用时长。