Suppr超能文献

利诺孕素和依托孕烯避孕埋植剂在利匹韦林或达芦那韦为基础的抗逆转录病毒治疗中 48 周的药代动力学。

Pharmacokinetics of levonorgestrel and etonogestrel contraceptive implants over 48 weeks with rilpivirine- or darunavir-based antiretroviral therapy.

机构信息

Infectious Diseases Institute, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 2022 Oct 28;77(11):3144-3152. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkac296.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pharmacokinetic data are lacking for progestin-releasing subdermal contraceptive implants when used with either rilpivirine- or darunavir/ritonavir-based ART.

OBJECTIVES

To characterize the pharmacokinetics of etonogestrel or levonorgestrel implants when administered with these ART regimens over 48 weeks.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two separate, parallel, three-group, non-randomized, pharmacokinetic studies evaluated either etonogestrel or levonorgestrel in women receiving rilpivirine- or darunavir-based ART compared with women without HIV (control group). Participants on ART were switched to rilpivirine-based ART with a run-in period of 6 weeks or darunavir-based ART with a run-in of 2 weeks prior to implant insertion. Plasma was collected on Day 0, and 1, 4, 12, 24, 36 and 48 weeks post-insertion. Plasma progestin concentrations were compared between ART and control groups by geometric mean ratio (GMR) and 90% CI.

RESULTS

At the primary endpoint of Week 24, progestin concentrations were similar between the rilpivirine and control groups [etonogestrel: 1.18 (0.99-1.37); levonorgestrel: 1.16 (0.97-1.33)]. At Week 24, progestin exposure was higher in the darunavir groups compared with the control group [etonogestrel: 2.56 (1.69-3.28); levonorgestrel: 1.89 (1.38-2.29)]. Results remained consistent through to Week 48. No differences in etonogestrel-related adverse events were observed, but both ART groups experienced more menstrual abnormalities versus the control group with levonorgestrel.

CONCLUSIONS

Etonogestrel and levonorgestrel concentrations were not altered by rilpivirine-based ART. Although progestin concentrations were higher in the ART groups containing ritonavir-boosted darunavir, no implant-related serious adverse events were observed. Both progestin-releasing implants are an appropriate contraceptive option with either rilpivirine- or darunavir/ritonavir-based ART.

摘要

背景

当与利匹韦林或达芦那韦/利托那韦为基础的抗逆转录病毒疗法联合使用时,孕激素释放皮下埋植避孕剂的药代动力学数据缺乏。

目的

在 48 周内,评估当与这些 ART 方案联合使用时,依托孕烯或左炔诺孕酮埋植剂的药代动力学特征。

患者和方法

两项独立的、平行的、三分组、非随机、药代动力学研究评估了接受利匹韦林或达芦那韦为基础的 ART 的女性与未感染 HIV 的女性(对照组)使用依托孕烯或左炔诺孕酮埋植剂的情况。接受 ART 的患者在植入前先进行 6 周的利匹韦林为基础的 ART 或 2 周的达芦那韦为基础的 ART 的导入期。在植入后第 0、1、4、12、24、36 和 48 周时采集血浆。通过几何均数比(GMR)和 90%置信区间(CI)比较 ART 组和对照组的血浆孕激素浓度。

结果

在主要终点第 24 周时,利匹韦林组和对照组之间的孕激素浓度相似[依托孕烯:1.18(0.99-1.37);左炔诺孕酮:1.16(0.97-1.33)]。在第 24 周时,与对照组相比,达芦那韦组的孕激素暴露量更高[依托孕烯:2.56(1.69-3.28);左炔诺孕酮:1.89(1.38-2.29)]。这些结果一直持续到第 48 周。与依托孕烯相关的不良事件无差异,但与对照组相比,左炔诺孕酮在两组 ART 组中都出现更多的月经异常。

结论

利匹韦林为基础的 ART 并未改变依托孕烯或左炔诺孕酮的浓度。尽管含利托那韦增强的达芦那韦的 ART 组中孕激素浓度更高,但未观察到与埋植剂相关的严重不良事件。孕激素释放皮下埋植避孕剂是利匹韦林或达芦那韦/利托那韦为基础的 ART 的一种合适的避孕选择。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

9
HIV and maternal mortality.艾滋病毒与孕产妇死亡率。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014 Nov;127(2):213-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.05.024. Epub 2014 Jul 17.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验