• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乌司奴单抗治疗克罗恩病的长期疗效与抗肿瘤坏死因子药物相当。

Long-term effectiveness of ustekinumab comparable to antitumor necrosis factor agents in patients with Crohn's disease.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.

Department of Health Administration and Policy, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.

出版信息

J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Nov;37(11):2105-2112. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15992. Epub 2022 Sep 16.

DOI:10.1111/jgh.15992
PMID:36059265
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9826487/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ustekinumab (UST), an antibody against the p40 subunit of interleukin-12/23, has been proven to be effective in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). However, large, long-term comparative studies of UST against anti--tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents are lacking. We compared the effectiveness of anti-TNF agents and UST in CD patients without prior use of biologics.

METHODS

We used a large nationwide anonymized Japanese database containing administrative medical claims data and various related patient data. In a propensity score-matched cohort with similar clinical characteristics, 2-year effectiveness was compared between patients treated with infliximab or adalimumab (anti-TNF group) and those treated with UST (UST group). Primary outcomes were cumulative rates of hospitalization, surgery, and persistence.

RESULTS

Among 53 540 CD patients, 7047 were extracted for eligibility, of which 5665 were treated with an anti-TNF agent and 1382 with UST. After propensity score matching, the cumulative hospitalization rates were comparable between anti-TNF and UST groups (P = 0.85; 25.3% vs 26.5% at 1 year, 33.8% vs 39.8% at 2 years). The cumulative surgery rates were also comparable between these groups (P = 0.46; 5.5% vs 5.1% at 1 year, 8.3% vs 8.4% at 2 years). The persistence rate at 1 year was higher in UST group (90.8% vs 92.5%), and that at 2 years was higher in anti-TNF group (81.2% and 74.6%); however, there was no significant difference in the cumulative persistence rate (P = 0.55).

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-TNF agents and UST appear to have comparable effectiveness for CD patients without prior use of biologics.

摘要

背景

乌司奴单抗(UST)是一种针对白细胞介素-12/23 的 p40 亚单位的抗体,已被证明对克罗恩病(CD)患者有效。然而,缺乏针对 CD 患者在使用生物制剂前使用 UST 与抗肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)药物的大型长期对比研究。我们比较了无生物制剂使用史的 CD 患者中抗 TNF 药物和 UST 的有效性。

方法

我们使用了一个包含管理医疗索赔数据和各种相关患者数据的大型全国性匿名日本数据库。在具有相似临床特征的倾向评分匹配队列中,比较了接受英夫利昔单抗或阿达木单抗(抗 TNF 组)和 UST(UST 组)治疗的患者的 2 年疗效。主要结局是住院、手术和持续治疗的累积率。

结果

在 53540 例 CD 患者中,有 7047 例符合入选条件,其中 5665 例接受抗 TNF 药物治疗,1382 例接受 UST 治疗。经过倾向评分匹配后,抗 TNF 组和 UST 组的累积住院率无差异(P=0.85;1 年时为 25.3%比 26.5%,2 年时为 33.8%比 39.8%)。两组的累积手术率也无差异(P=0.46;1 年时为 5.5%比 5.1%,2 年时为 8.3%比 8.4%)。1 年时 UST 组的持续治疗率较高(90.8%比 92.5%),2 年时抗 TNF 组的持续治疗率较高(81.2%和 74.6%);然而,累积持续治疗率无显著差异(P=0.55)。

结论

对于无生物制剂使用史的 CD 患者,抗 TNF 药物和 UST 的疗效似乎相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbc1/9826487/ef0b98bfabfa/JGH-37-2105-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbc1/9826487/25051e16c750/JGH-37-2105-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbc1/9826487/13eddf4e5d5b/JGH-37-2105-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbc1/9826487/0dc33b131a43/JGH-37-2105-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbc1/9826487/5bf73b0c6e7a/JGH-37-2105-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbc1/9826487/1c25d2fb4b81/JGH-37-2105-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbc1/9826487/ef0b98bfabfa/JGH-37-2105-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbc1/9826487/25051e16c750/JGH-37-2105-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbc1/9826487/13eddf4e5d5b/JGH-37-2105-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbc1/9826487/0dc33b131a43/JGH-37-2105-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbc1/9826487/5bf73b0c6e7a/JGH-37-2105-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbc1/9826487/1c25d2fb4b81/JGH-37-2105-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbc1/9826487/ef0b98bfabfa/JGH-37-2105-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Long-term effectiveness of ustekinumab comparable to antitumor necrosis factor agents in patients with Crohn's disease.乌司奴单抗治疗克罗恩病的长期疗效与抗肿瘤坏死因子药物相当。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Nov;37(11):2105-2112. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15992. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
2
Comparative real-world outcomes between ustekinumab, infliximab, and adalimumab in bio-naïve and bio-experienced Crohn's disease patients: a retrospective multicenter study.在生物初治和生物经验丰富的克罗恩病患者中,乌司奴单抗、英夫利昔单抗和阿达木单抗的真实世界疗效比较:一项回顾性多中心研究。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2024 Sep 11;24(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s12876-024-03403-8.
3
Comparative Effectiveness of Ustekinumab and Anti-TNF Agent as First-Line Biological Therapy in Luminal Crohn's Disease: A Retrospective Study From 2 Referral Centers.乌司奴单抗与抗 TNF 制剂作为肠病性克罗恩病一线生物治疗药物的疗效比较:来自 2 家转诊中心的回顾性研究。
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2023 Jun 1;29(6):923-931. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izac167.
4
Utility of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring for Tumor Necrosis Factor Antagonists and Ustekinumab in Postoperative Crohn's Disease.治疗药物监测在术后克罗恩病中对肿瘤坏死因子拮抗剂和优特克单抗的应用价值
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2022 Dec 1;28(12):1865-1871. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izac030.
5
Endoscopic Postoperative Recurrence in Crohn's Disease After Curative Ileocecal Resection with Early Prophylaxis by Anti-TNF, Vedolizumab or Ustekinumab: A Real-World Multicentre European Study.抗 TNF、Vedolizumab 或 Ustekinumab 早期预防治疗后克罗恩病患者行回肠末端切除术的内镜术后复发:一项真实世界的多中心欧洲研究。
J Crohns Colitis. 2022 Dec 5;16(12):1882-1892. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjac100.
6
Real-world Comparative Effectiveness of Ustekinumab vs Anti-TNF in Crohn's Disease With Propensity Score Adjustment: Induction Phase Results From the Prospective, Observational RUN-CD Study.基于倾向评分调整的乌司奴单抗与抗 TNF 在克罗恩病中真实世界疗效比较:前瞻性、观察性 RUN-CD 研究诱导期结果。
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2023 Nov 2;29(11):1741-1750. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izac271.
7
Ustekinumab Versus Anti-tumour Necrosis Factor Alpha Agents as Second-Line Biologics in Crohn's Disease.乌司奴单抗与抗肿瘤坏死因子 α 制剂二线治疗克罗恩病的比较。
Dig Dis Sci. 2023 Jul;68(7):3119-3128. doi: 10.1007/s10620-023-07897-2. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
8
Superior treatment persistence with ustekinumab in Crohn's disease and vedolizumab in ulcerative colitis compared with anti-TNF biological agents: real-world registry data from the Persistence Australian National IBD Cohort (PANIC) study.与抗 TNF 生物制剂相比,乌司奴单抗治疗克罗恩病和维得利珠单抗治疗溃疡性结肠炎的持续治疗效果更好:来自真实世界的澳大利亚国家 IBD 队列(PANIC)研究的持久性注册数据。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Aug;54(3):292-301. doi: 10.1111/apt.16436. Epub 2021 Jun 20.
9
Biological Agents in the Treatment of Crohn's Disease: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis From the Prospective Persistence Australian National IBD Cohort (PANIC3) Study.生物制剂治疗克罗恩病:前瞻性持久性澳大利亚国家 IBD 队列(PANIC3)研究的倾向评分匹配分析。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2024 Aug 1;119(8):1536-1544. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002679. Epub 2024 Jan 26.
10
Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Agents in Biologic-Naive Patients With Crohn's Disease.抗肿瘤坏死因子药物在初治克罗恩病患者中的疗效及安全性比较
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Aug;14(8):1120-1129.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.03.038. Epub 2016 Apr 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Anti-IL-12/23p40 antibodies for induction of remission in Crohn's disease.用于诱导克罗恩病缓解的抗白细胞介素-12/23 p40抗体。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 May 13;5(5):CD007572. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007572.pub4.
2
Comparative real-world outcomes between ustekinumab, infliximab, and adalimumab in bio-naïve and bio-experienced Crohn's disease patients: a retrospective multicenter study.在生物初治和生物经验丰富的克罗恩病患者中,乌司奴单抗、英夫利昔单抗和阿达木单抗的真实世界疗效比较:一项回顾性多中心研究。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2024 Sep 11;24(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s12876-024-03403-8.
3
Comparative Effectiveness of Tacrolimus and Infliximab in Hospitalized Patients With Ulcerative Colitis.

本文引用的文献

1
Ustekinumab versus adalimumab for induction and maintenance therapy in biologic-naive patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, phase 3b trial.乌司奴单抗与阿达木单抗用于生物初治中重度活动型克罗恩病患者诱导缓解和维持治疗的比较:一项多中心、随机、双盲、平行分组、3b 期临床试验。
Lancet. 2022 Jun 11;399(10342):2200-2211. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00688-2.
2
Comparative efficacy and safety of biologic therapies for moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.比较生物疗法治疗中重度克罗恩病的疗效和安全性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Dec;6(12):1002-1014. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00312-5. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
3
他克莫司与英夫利昔单抗在溃疡性结肠炎住院患者中的疗效比较
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2024 Jan 1;15(1):e00642. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000642.
4
The Impact of Concomitant Ulcerative Colitis on the Clinical Course in Patients with Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis: An Investigation Using a Nationwide Database in Japan.原发性硬化性胆管炎患者合并溃疡性结肠炎对临床病程的影响:一项基于日本全国数据库的调查
Inflamm Intest Dis. 2023 Feb 1;7(3-4):147-154. doi: 10.1159/000529338. eCollection 2023 Mar.
Ustekinuma b for Crohn's Disease: Two-Year Results of the Initiative on Crohn and Colitis (ICC) Registry, a Nationwide Prospective Observational Cohort Study.乌司奴单抗治疗克罗恩病:炎症性肠病(ICC)注册研究的两年结果,一项全国性前瞻性观察队列研究。
J Crohns Colitis. 2021 Nov 8;15(11):1920-1930. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjab081.
4
Comparative Efficacy and Rapidity of Action for Infliximab vs Ustekinumab in Biologic Naïve Crohn's Disease.生物制剂初治克罗恩病中英夫利昔单抗与乌司奴单抗的疗效和起效速度比较。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Jul;20(7):1579-1587.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.04.006. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
5
Five-Year Efficacy and Safety of Ustekinumab Treatment in Crohn's Disease: The IM-UNITI Trial.乌司奴单抗治疗克罗恩病的 5 年疗效和安全性:IM-UNITI 试验。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Mar;20(3):578-590.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.02.025. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
6
Efficacy of urgent colonoscopy for colonic diverticular bleeding: A propensity score-matched analysis using a nationwide database in Japan.急診結腸鏡檢查治療結腸憩室出血的療效:基於日本全國數據庫的傾向評分匹配分析。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Jun;36(6):1598-1604. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15316. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
7
Comparative effectiveness of ustekinumab or vedolizumab after one year in 130 patients with anti-TNF-refractory Crohn's disease.130 例抗 TNF 治疗失败的克罗恩病患者中乌司奴单抗或维得利珠单抗治疗 1 年后的疗效比较。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Oct;52(8):1341-1352. doi: 10.1111/apt.16057. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
8
Trends in Corticosteroid Prescriptions for Ulcerative Colitis and Factors Associated with Long-Term Corticosteroid Use: Analysis Using Japanese Claims Data from 2006 to 2016.2006 年至 2016 年日本医保索赔数据分析:溃疡性结肠炎皮质类固醇处方趋势及与长期皮质类固醇使用相关的因素。
J Crohns Colitis. 2021 Mar 5;15(3):358-366. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjaa172.
9
Identification of the Most Effective Position for Ustekinumab in Treatment Algorithms for Crohn's Disease.识别乌司奴单抗在克罗恩病治疗方案中的最有效位置。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Oct;19(10):2082-2092.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.08.021. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
10
Real-world long-term effectiveness of ustekinumab in Crohn's disease: results from the ENEIDA registry.真实世界中乌司奴单抗治疗克罗恩病的长期疗效:来自 ENEIDA 注册研究的数据。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Sep;52(6):1017-1030. doi: 10.1111/apt.15958. Epub 2020 Aug 8.