Hu Xingjiang, Zhang Qiao, Zheng Yunliang, Zhai You, Xu Nana, Zhao Qingwei, Liu Jian, Wan Longyan, Luo Jindan
Research Center for Clinical Pharmacy, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory for Drug Evaluation and Clinical Research, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Shanghai Livzon Pharmacy Co., Ltd, Shanghai, Zhejiang, China.
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Aug 19;13:946505. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.946505. eCollection 2022.
Leuprolide acetate microspheres developed by Shanghai Livzon Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (T) have been marketed in China for more than 10 years, benefiting a large number of patients, and will continue to play an important role in China. However, as a generic drug, it is unclear whether there is a difference in efficacy between T and the original product Enantone (R). This study compared the differences in efficacy and safety of two 1-month depot formulations in 48 healthy Chinese male subjects by comparing multiple pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) parameters. The main research indicators were the PK parameters of leuprolide (C, AUC, AUC, and AUC) and the PD parameters of testosterone (E, AUEC, AUEC, and AUEC) after 42 days of administration. The C, AUC, AUC and AUC of leuprolide were slightly higher in the T group than in the R group with 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of 94.43-118.53%, 109.13-141.88%, 109.53-139.54%, and 105.17-145.74%, respectively. No significant differences in the PD parameters (E, AUEC, AUEC, and AUEC) existed between the T and R groups, and 90% CIs were 62.80-93.57%, 88.17-110.55, 95.72%-118.50%, and 79.77-105.63, respectively. At 672 h (D28), the castration rate of T was 91.30% (21/23) and that of R was 60.87% (14/23). The PK characteristics were consistent and the inhibitory effects on testosterone levels were similar in both T and R groups; further, clinical safety was observed for both T and R formulations, suggesting that these two products can replace each other in clinical practice. http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn/clinicaltrials.searchlistdetail.dhtml, identifier CTR20200641.
上海丽珠药业有限公司研发的醋酸亮丙瑞林微球(T)已在中国上市10多年,使大量患者受益,并将继续在中国发挥重要作用。然而,作为一种仿制药,T与原研产品抑那通(R)在疗效上是否存在差异尚不清楚。本研究通过比较多个药代动力学(PK)和药效学(PD)参数,比较了两种1个月长效制剂在48名健康中国男性受试者中的疗效和安全性差异。主要研究指标为给药42天后亮丙瑞林的PK参数(C、AUC、AUC和AUC)和睾酮的PD参数(E、AUEC、AUEC和AUEC)。T组亮丙瑞林的C、AUC、AUC和AUC略高于R组,90%置信区间(CI)分别为94.43-118.53%、109.13-141.88%、109.53-139.54%和105.17-145.74%。T组和R组的PD参数(E、AUEC、AUEC和AUEC)无显著差异,90%CI分别为62.80-93.57%、88.17-110.55、95.72%-118.50%和79.77-105.63。在672小时(D28)时,T组的去势率为91.30%(21/23),R组为60.87%(14/23)。两组的PK特征一致,对睾酮水平的抑制作用相似;此外,T组和R组制剂均观察到临床安全性,表明这两种产品在临床实践中可以相互替代。 http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn/clinicaltrials.searchlistdetail.dhtml,标识符CTR20200641