Zhou Xinwei, Shi Xianghui, Ren Yanxia, Yan Tingting, Ye Qiao
Department of Vascular Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, China.
Department of Rheumatology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, China.
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Aug 19;13:912906. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.912906. eCollection 2022.
Anti-tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) agents are often used for Behçet's disease (BD) in clinical practice, but they have not been validated by a high level of evidence. We systematically reviewed published controlled trials to investigate the efficacy and safety of anti-TNF-α therapy and summarize the efficacy of anti-TNF-α therapy relative to the available therapeutic options. A systematic database search was conducted (PubMed, Embase and Cochrane) using specific search terms. All controlled studies of anti-TNF-α treatment of BD patients prior to December 2021 were included. Single-arm studies were excluded. The decision of whether to incorporate data into the meta-analysis or summarize the data by qualitative synthesis was based on the results of the literature screening. Of 4389 screened studies, 13 (total 778 patients) were included in accordance with our retrieval strategy, comprising 1 randomized controlled trial, 1 prospective study, 10 retrospective studies, and 1 multicentre open-label study. Ten studies (76.9%) involved Behçet's uveitis (BU), 1 involved intestinal BD, and the other studies had undefined subtypes. Subgroup reviews were conducted according to the control drug. Four studies involving 167 participants reported relapse rates. Meta-analysis of three of these studies demonstrated that, compared with traditional immunosuppressant (TIS) therapy, anti-TNF-α therapy reduced the relapse rates in patients with BU. In targeted drug comparison studies, the efficacy appeared to be similar between the anti-TNF-α agent and interferon in BU patients. The rates of adverse events were comparable between a variety of different therapeutic controls. Serious adverse events were not observed in 53.8% (7/13) of the studies. Compared with TIS therapy, anti-TNF-a therapy reduces the relapse of uveitis in patients with BD. However, the evidence regarding anti-TNF-α therapy is very limited for the full spectrum of BD subtypes, which calls for caution.
抗肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)药物在临床实践中常用于白塞病(BD),但尚未得到高水平证据的验证。我们系统回顾已发表的对照试验,以研究抗TNF-α治疗的疗效和安全性,并总结抗TNF-α治疗相对于现有治疗选择的疗效。使用特定检索词对数据库进行了系统检索(PubMed、Embase和Cochrane)。纳入了2021年12月之前所有关于抗TNF-α治疗BD患者的对照研究。排除单臂研究。根据文献筛选结果决定是将数据纳入荟萃分析还是通过定性综合总结数据。在4389项筛选研究中,有13项(共778例患者)符合我们的检索策略被纳入,包括1项随机对照试验、1项前瞻性研究、10项回顾性研究和1项多中心开放标签研究。10项研究(76.9%)涉及白塞氏葡萄膜炎(BU),1项涉及肠道BD,其他研究的亚型未明确。根据对照药物进行亚组分析。四项涉及167名参与者的研究报告了复发率。其中三项研究的荟萃分析表明,与传统免疫抑制剂(TIS)治疗相比,抗TNF-α治疗降低了BU患者的复发率。在靶向药物比较研究中,抗TNF-α药物与干扰素在BU患者中的疗效似乎相似。各种不同治疗对照的不良事件发生率相当。53.8%(7/13)的研究未观察到严重不良事件。与TIS治疗相比,抗TNF-α治疗可降低BD患者葡萄膜炎的复发率。然而,关于抗TNF-α治疗在BD全谱亚型方面的证据非常有限,需要谨慎使用。