Biswas Jyotirmoy, Dhali Arkadeep, Panja Sumana, Karpha Kankana, Nath Siddhartha, Dhali Gopal Krishna
Department of Physiology, College of Medicine and Sagor Dutta Hospital, Kolkata, IND.
Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, School of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, IND.
Cureus. 2022 Jul 29;14(7):e27458. doi: 10.7759/cureus.27458. eCollection 2022 Jul.
Background Most of the government-sponsored medical teaching institutions in India do not provide safety lancets, and hence, the students are compelled to use hypodermic needles. These needles are widely unpopular among students due to the potential hazards (pain, fear, anxiety) associated with them. This study aims to compare any difference in fear and anxiety associated with finger pricking with a hypodermic needle and a safety lancet. Methods This is a prospective cohort study. The current study included data from first-year undergraduate medical students for academic sessions 2021-22. Results A total of 121 students participated in the study. Eighty-two (67.8%) participants were male. 41/82 male participants and 20/39 female participants were allocated to the intervention cohort. 111 (91.7%) pricked their fingers by themselves. The sight of others pricking during the experiment (17 versus 5, p=0.004) and the thought of pain while pricking (36 versus 16, p<0.001) was significantly associated more with the use of a hypodermic needle compared to a safety lancet. There was no significant difference in students perceiving the smell of the hematology laboratory (4 versus 1, p=0.165) and the sight of blood (9 versus 3, p=0.064) as a factor influencing their fear and anxiety in both cohorts. There was no gender difference in the perception of these factors. Symptoms were significantly lower in the intervention cohort compared to the control cohort (8 versus 20, odds ratio 0.302, p=0.008). The most common symptom experienced was excessive sweating (n=22, 18.18%), followed by drying of the mouth (n=12, 9.91%). There was a significant difference in pain scores between the intervention and the control cohorts. There was no significant difference in pain scores among male and female subjects. Conclusion A considerable difference between the two cohorts was found. The use of lancets can be proposed to medical teaching institutions for psychological advantage, pain reduction, and overall better quality of the process.
印度大多数政府资助的医学教学机构不提供安全采血针,因此,学生们不得不使用皮下注射针头。由于这些针头存在潜在危害(疼痛、恐惧、焦虑),在学生中普遍不受欢迎。本研究旨在比较使用皮下注射针头和安全采血针对手指采血相关的恐惧和焦虑的差异。
这是一项前瞻性队列研究。本研究纳入了2021 - 22学年本科一年级医学生的数据。
共有121名学生参与了研究。82名(67.8%)参与者为男性。41/82名男性参与者和20/39名女性参与者被分配到干预队列。111名(91.7%)学生自行刺破手指。与安全采血针相比,在实验过程中看到他人采血(17例对5例,p = 0.004)以及采血时想到疼痛(36例对16例,p < 0.001)与使用皮下注射针头的关联更为显著。在两个队列中,学生将血液学实验室的气味(4例对1例,p = 0.165)和看到血液(9例对3例,p = 0.064)视为影响其恐惧和焦虑的因素方面没有显著差异。在对这些因素的认知上没有性别差异。干预队列中的症状明显低于对照组(8例对20例,优势比0.302,p = 0.008)。最常见的症状是出汗过多(n = 22,18.18%),其次是口干(n = 12,9.91%)。干预组和对照组之间的疼痛评分存在显著差异。男性和女性受试者的疼痛评分没有显著差异。
发现两个队列之间存在相当大的差异。可以向医学教学机构建议使用采血针,以获得心理优势、减轻疼痛并提高整个过程的质量。